Dear list:
this was the last post I received (I think I am subscribed)
Have I been (or the list?) terminated?
John Mikes
- Original Message -
From: Bruno Marchal
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2006 5:27 AM
Subject: Re: Natural Order Belief
: Natural Order Belief
John,
You are right, I was wrong. Those deeds are not contingent. They
probably appears automatically when one give a name to God.
Perhaps, God could be defined by this: it is the one which is such
that once you give it a name or a definition trouble appears
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Saturday, December 16, 2006 8:19 AM
Subject: Re: Natural Order Belief
Dear John,
This is ancient history judging from the post date. Just the same - I saw a
post from you some time ago with the single word in the subject line
unsubscribe. I'm
it scientifically.
Thanks for your thought provoking reflections.
John
- Original Message -
From: Stathis Papaioannou [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2006 5:25 AM
Subject: RE: Natural Order Belief
John,
Some people
Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
John,
I apologise if you thought I was referring to you in any way: I was just
trying to
make a general point about how we come to accept some beliefs and reject
others.
Perhaps I should not have used the pejorative terms, but I think it is a fair
it scientifically.
Thanks for your thought provoking reflections.
John
- Original Message -
From: Stathis Papaioannou [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2006 5:25 AM
Subject: RE: Natural Order Belief
John,
Some people believe crazy things
for the biosphere.
Opimistically yours
John
- Original Message -
From: Stathis Papaioannou [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2006 7:20 AM
Subject: RE: Natural Order Belief
Tom Caylor writes: (skip)
SP:
The problem with religious
would like a dog with 6 feet.
John
- Original Message -
From: Stathis Papaioannou [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2006 4:41 AM
Subject: RE: Natural Order Belief
John,
I think the trap is to look for absolute certainty. Can I
I'm curious: how many people on this list are theists?
Stathis Papaioannou
I don't believe in any theistic garbage.
As a scientist the truth or otherwise of the proposition X = There is a
god and he did this sits forever perched on the verge of disproof through
lack of evidence in the most
Le 16-nov.-06, à 06:58, Stathis Papaioannou a écrit :
I'm curious: how many people on this list are theists?
CF:
A theist God (as opposed to a deist God) is one who intervenes in
the natural order, i.e. does miracles. Stenger will readily admit
that his argument does not apply to a
Bruno,
I suspect you can talk about God in this way when the subject of atheism
comes up because you live in post-Enlightenment Europe. But if you lived in
a certain large English-speaking country where a substantial proportion of
the population believe that God created Adam and Eve 6000
Le 16-nov.-06, à 13:59, Stathis Papaioannou a écrit :
Bruno,
I suspect you can talk about God in this way when the subject of
atheism
comes up because you live in post-Enlightenment Europe.
It is a difficult subject, perhaps a bit out of topics or premature,
but I do not believe so
thousand
thinking sould cannot change the fear-based mindset of 6 billion. J
- Original Message -
From: Bruno Marchal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 10:23 AM
Subject: Re: Natural Order Belief
Le 16-nov.-06, à 13:59, Stathis
Bruno Marchal wrote:
Le 16-nov.-06, à 13:59, Stathis Papaioannou a écrit :
Bruno,
I suspect you can talk about God in this way when the subject of
atheism
comes up because you live in post-Enlightenment Europe.
It is a difficult subject, perhaps a bit out of topics or premature,
I'm curious: how many people on this list are theists?
Stathis Papaioannou
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Natural Order Belief
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 22:52:22 -0800
Brent Meeker wrote:
Tom Caylor wrote:
Tom Caylor writes:
But it's not a mistake to assume a magical Daddy in the sky who'll torture
you in hell if you don't flatter him? Lewis must have enjoyed this
arrogant view of his own perception that could point to the mistakes of
strawmen he invented for the purpose.
I don't
Le 14-nov.-06, à 07:52, Tom Caylor a écrit :
Brent Meeker wrote:
Tom Caylor wrote:
Brent Meeker wrote:
An excellent essay. I agree with almost everything you wrote; and
you put it very well. Would you mind if I cross posted it to Vic
Stenger's AVOID-L mailing list. You can check out
Brent Meeker wrote:
Tom Caylor wrote:
Brent Meeker wrote:
Tom Caylor wrote:
Brent Meeker wrote:
An excellent essay. I agree with almost everything you wrote; and you
put it very well. Would you mind if I cross posted it to Vic Stenger's
AVOID-L mailing list. You can check out
Tom Caylor wrote:
Brent Meeker wrote:
Tom Caylor wrote:
Brent Meeker wrote:
An excellent essay. I agree with almost everything you wrote; and you put
it very well. Would you mind if I cross posted it to Vic Stenger's
AVOID-L mailing list. You can check out the list here:
19 matches
Mail list logo
