Ronald,
On 21 Dec 2008, at 15:40, Bruno Marchal wrote:
How is there any mathematics with nothing to
conceive of it?
Let me try a straightest answer from math, with an example. Take the
digital or discrete line. You can map it on the integers. It is the
symmetrical extension of the
Bruno and Kim,
enjoyable discours by two math.-ly impaired minds (excuse me Kim!) - I met
several youngsters (up to 70 y.o.) who simply had no 'pitch' to math - yet
were good smart artists, even business(wo)men, parents and technicians (not
so with politicians, they are not what I call 'smart').
Hi Kim,
On 20 Dec 2008, at 06:06, Kim Jones wrote:
Hmmm... My diagnostic is that you are suffering from an acute form
of math-anxiety. I can cure that!
Looks like I have to say Yes, Doctor again!
Good!
Tell me first if you have been once mentally or physically raped
or
...@googlegroups.com
Sent: Saturday, December 20, 2008 7:25 PM
Subject: Re: KIM 2.1
On 21/12/2008, at 6:12 AM, John Mikes wrote:
Kim,
although I try to keep my common sense, I do enjoy sometimes the
follies in the transport and zombie etc. abominations.
To bring in, however, why a 'machine' should
Hi Ronald,
On 19 Dec 2008, at 14:31, ronaldheld wrote:
Bruno:
I may have missed something in the last two days.
I still do not understand. You say this starts with the real world,
which to me is the physical universe/Multiverse, but it actually
starts with arithmetic.
Your remark
Kim,
although I try to keep my common sense, I do enjoy sometimes the follies in
the transport and zombie etc. abominations.
To bring in, however, why a 'machine' should be in English a lady, is too
much for me.
In 'my' language there are NO genders at all, almost as in Swedish (utrum
= human
On 21/12/2008, at 6:12 AM, John Mikes wrote:
Kim,
although I try to keep my common sense, I do enjoy sometimes the
follies in the transport and zombie etc. abominations.
To bring in, however, why a 'machine' should be in English a lady,
is too much for me.
In 'my' language there are NO
Bruno:
I may have missed something in the last two days.
I still do not understand. You say this starts with the real world,
which to me is the physical universe/Multiverse, but it actually
starts with arithmetic. How is there any mathematics with nothing to
conceive of it? What are the
On 19/12/2008, at 5:52 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
you think it's impolite to think of a machine as a sexless it (as
in
Anglais) -- yet you quite arbitrarily assign a feminine gender to the
word!!! What's so feminine about a machine anyway? What if the
machine
is gay? It might fit
Gay
On 18 Dec 2008, at 03:29, Kim Jones wrote:
On 16/12/2008, at 5:11 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
...
I assume very short scanning-annihilation times and short receipting-
reconstitution times. Hypotheses like that, or like the fact that
your
generalized brain is in your skull, will be
On 17 Dec 2008, at 12:31, Kim Jones wrote:
On 16/12/2008, at 5:11 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Hi Kim,
You have accepted the artificial digital brain.
They got the colour wrong but that's OK - it would only have been
worth it if I'd gone for the transparent cranium option as well
Ah ah!
On 16/12/2008, at 5:11 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Hi Kim,
You have accepted the artificial digital brain.
They got the colour wrong but that's OK - it would only have been
worth it if I'd gone for the transparent cranium option as well
This means that you
say yes to the doctor who
On 18/12/2008, at 5:51 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Gosh, Kim, don't tell me that you will enjoy the full UDA, because
this would, not doubt, trig in me a strong motivation for explaining
to you the arithmetical version of the UDA; that is; how to explain
the UDA to the universal machine,
13 matches
Mail list logo
