no God, we'd have to invent him so everything
could function.
- Receiving the following content -
From: Stephen P. King
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2012-08-22, 11:24:16
Subject: Re: Leibniz's theodicy: a nonlocal and hopefully best mereology
What exactly determines the 10^500
could function.
- Receiving the following content -
From: Richard Ruquist
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2012-08-22, 12:34:59
Subject: Re: Leibniz's theodicy: a nonlocal and hopefully best mereology
Stephan,
According to Shing-Tung Yau http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shing-Tung_Yau
: everything-list
Time: 2012-08-22, 13:16:14
Subject: Re: Leibniz's theodicy: a nonlocal and hopefully best mereology
Thank God- just an expression.
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 12:54 PM, Stephen P. King stephe...@charter.net wrote:
Hi Richard,
I am familiar with those idea and several others
everything
could function.
- Receiving the following content -
From: meekerdb
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2012-08-22, 21:35:56
Subject: Re: Leibniz's theodicy: a nonlocal and hopefully best mereology
On 8/22/2012 6:21 PM, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 8/22/2012 7:43 PM, meekerdb wrote
, If there's no God, we'd have to invent him so everything
could function.
- Receiving the following content -
From: Stephen P. King
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2012-08-23, 08:18:36
Subject: Re: Leibniz's theodicy: a nonlocal and hopefully best mereology
Hi Roger,
OK, we agree
function.
- Receiving the following content -
From: Stephen P. King
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2012-08-21, 15:25:31
Subject: Re: Leibniz's theodicy: a nonlocal and hopefully best mereology
On 8/21/2012 12:19 PM, meekerdb wrote:
On 8/21/2012 4:10 AM, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi guys
.
- Receiving the following content -
From: Richard Ruquist
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2012-08-21, 15:39:37
Subject: Re: Leibniz's theodicy: a nonlocal and hopefully best mereology
String theory predicts the viscosity of the quark-gluon plasma?
already found at the LHC and several other
@googlegroups.com
*Time:* 2012-08-21, 15:25:31
*Subject:* Re: Leibniz's theodicy: a nonlocal and hopefully best mereology
On 8/21/2012 12:19 PM, meekerdb wrote:
On 8/21/2012 4:10 AM, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi guys,
Neither CYM's nor strings physically exist-- instead, they represent
things
: everything-list
Time: 2012-08-21, 15:25:31
Subject: Re: Leibniz's theodicy: a nonlocal and hopefully best mereology
On 8/21/2012 12:19 PM, meekerdb wrote:
On 8/21/2012 4:10 AM, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi guys,
?
Neither CYM's nor strings physically exist--?nstead, they represent things that
exist
-08-21, 21:26:58
Subject: Re: Leibniz's theodicy: a nonlocal and hopefully best mereology
Stephan,
I solved the landscape problem by assuming that each monad was distinct
consistent with the astronomical observations that the hyperfine constant?
varied monotonically across the universe.
Richard
stephe...@charter.net
*Receiver:* everything-list everything-list@googlegroups.com
*Time:* 2012-08-21, 15:25:31
*Subject:* Re: Leibniz's theodicy: a nonlocal and hopefully best
mereology
On 8/21/2012 12:19 PM, meekerdb wrote:
On 8/21/2012 4:10 AM, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi guys,
�
Neither
*Subject:* Re: Leibniz's theodicy: a nonlocal and hopefully best mereology
Stephan,
I solved the landscape problem by assuming that each monad was distinct
consistent with the astronomical observations that the hyperfine constant�
varied monotonically across the universe.
Richard
On Tue, Aug
everything could function.
- Receiving the following content -
*From:* Richard Ruquist yann...@gmail.com
*Receiver:* everything-list everything-list@googlegroups.com
*Time:* 2012-08-22, 09:17:38
*Subject:* Re: Re: Re: Leibniz's theodicy: a nonlocal and hopefully best
mereology
: a nonlocal and hopefully best mereology
Stephan,
Well I agree the CYMs are a form of substance. But there are string theories
where the background spacetime is flexible, to use a common term. So that is
not a theory limitation.
The frozen block approximation allows for certain solutions
14 matches
Mail list logo