Re: Re: Leibniz's theodicy: a nonlocal and hopefully best mereology

2012-08-23 Thread Roger Clough
no God, we'd have to invent him so everything could function. - Receiving the following content - From: Stephen P. King Receiver: everything-list Time: 2012-08-22, 11:24:16 Subject: Re: Leibniz's theodicy: a nonlocal and hopefully best mereology What exactly determines the 10^500

Re: Re: Leibniz's theodicy: a nonlocal and hopefully best mereology

2012-08-23 Thread Roger Clough
could function. - Receiving the following content - From: Richard Ruquist Receiver: everything-list Time: 2012-08-22, 12:34:59 Subject: Re: Leibniz's theodicy: a nonlocal and hopefully best mereology Stephan, According to Shing-Tung Yau http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shing-Tung_Yau

Re: Re: Leibniz's theodicy: a nonlocal and hopefully best mereology

2012-08-23 Thread Roger Clough
: everything-list Time: 2012-08-22, 13:16:14 Subject: Re: Leibniz's theodicy: a nonlocal and hopefully best mereology Thank God- just an expression. On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 12:54 PM, Stephen P. King stephe...@charter.net wrote: Hi Richard, I am familiar with those idea and several others

Re: Re: Leibniz's theodicy: a nonlocal and hopefully best mereology

2012-08-23 Thread Roger Clough
everything could function. - Receiving the following content - From: meekerdb Receiver: everything-list Time: 2012-08-22, 21:35:56 Subject: Re: Leibniz's theodicy: a nonlocal and hopefully best mereology On 8/22/2012 6:21 PM, Stephen P. King wrote: On 8/22/2012 7:43 PM, meekerdb wrote

Re: Re: Leibniz's theodicy: a nonlocal and hopefully best mereology

2012-08-23 Thread Roger Clough
, If there's no God, we'd have to invent him so everything could function. - Receiving the following content - From: Stephen P. King Receiver: everything-list Time: 2012-08-23, 08:18:36 Subject: Re: Leibniz's theodicy: a nonlocal and hopefully best mereology Hi Roger, OK, we agree

Re: Re: Leibniz's theodicy: a nonlocal and hopefully best mereology

2012-08-22 Thread Roger Clough
function. - Receiving the following content - From: Stephen P. King Receiver: everything-list Time: 2012-08-21, 15:25:31 Subject: Re: Leibniz's theodicy: a nonlocal and hopefully best mereology On 8/21/2012 12:19 PM, meekerdb wrote: On 8/21/2012 4:10 AM, Roger Clough wrote: Hi guys

Re: Re: Leibniz's theodicy: a nonlocal and hopefully best mereology

2012-08-22 Thread Roger Clough
. - Receiving the following content - From: Richard Ruquist Receiver: everything-list Time: 2012-08-21, 15:39:37 Subject: Re: Leibniz's theodicy: a nonlocal and hopefully best mereology String theory predicts the viscosity of the quark-gluon plasma? already found at the LHC and several other

Re: Re: Leibniz's theodicy: a nonlocal and hopefully best mereology

2012-08-22 Thread Richard Ruquist
@googlegroups.com *Time:* 2012-08-21, 15:25:31 *Subject:* Re: Leibniz's theodicy: a nonlocal and hopefully best mereology On 8/21/2012 12:19 PM, meekerdb wrote: On 8/21/2012 4:10 AM, Roger Clough wrote: Hi guys, Neither CYM's nor strings physically exist-- instead, they represent things

Re: Re: Re: Leibniz's theodicy: a nonlocal and hopefully best mereology

2012-08-22 Thread Roger Clough
: everything-list Time: 2012-08-21, 15:25:31 Subject: Re: Leibniz's theodicy: a nonlocal and hopefully best mereology On 8/21/2012 12:19 PM, meekerdb wrote: On 8/21/2012 4:10 AM, Roger Clough wrote: Hi guys, ? Neither CYM's nor strings physically exist--?nstead, they represent things that exist

Re: Re: Leibniz's theodicy: a nonlocal and hopefully best mereology

2012-08-22 Thread Roger Clough
-08-21, 21:26:58 Subject: Re: Leibniz's theodicy: a nonlocal and hopefully best mereology Stephan, I solved the landscape problem by assuming that each monad was distinct consistent with the astronomical observations that the hyperfine constant? varied monotonically across the universe. Richard

Re: Re: Re: Leibniz's theodicy: a nonlocal and hopefully best mereology

2012-08-22 Thread Richard Ruquist
stephe...@charter.net *Receiver:* everything-list everything-list@googlegroups.com *Time:* 2012-08-21, 15:25:31 *Subject:* Re: Leibniz's theodicy: a nonlocal and hopefully best mereology On 8/21/2012 12:19 PM, meekerdb wrote: On 8/21/2012 4:10 AM, Roger Clough wrote: Hi guys, � Neither

Re: Re: Leibniz's theodicy: a nonlocal and hopefully best mereology

2012-08-22 Thread Richard Ruquist
*Subject:* Re: Leibniz's theodicy: a nonlocal and hopefully best mereology Stephan, I solved the landscape problem by assuming that each monad was distinct consistent with the astronomical observations that the hyperfine constant� varied monotonically across the universe. Richard On Tue, Aug

Re: Re: Re: Re: Leibniz's theodicy: a nonlocal and hopefully best mereology

2012-08-22 Thread Richard Ruquist
everything could function. - Receiving the following content - *From:* Richard Ruquist yann...@gmail.com *Receiver:* everything-list everything-list@googlegroups.com *Time:* 2012-08-22, 09:17:38 *Subject:* Re: Re: Re: Leibniz's theodicy: a nonlocal and hopefully best mereology

Re: Re: Leibniz's theodicy: a nonlocal and hopefully best mereology

2012-08-21 Thread Roger Clough
: a nonlocal and hopefully best mereology Stephan, Well I agree the CYMs are a form of substance. But there are string theories where the background spacetime is flexible, to use a common term. So that is not a theory limitation. The frozen block approximation allows for certain solutions