Bruno wrote: of Whom? Conscious applies to person and they all have some
I, even if they cannot be sure what it is, and perceive it in many ways.
Here I am again in the dichotomy with Brent about 'alive' and 'life':
'conscious' and 'consciousness'! I arrived at the latter as response to
relations
On 23 Sep 2013, at 21:44, John Mikes wrote:
Bruno wrote: of Whom? Conscious applies to person and they all have
some I, even if they cannot be sure what it is, and perceive it in
many ways.
Here I am again in the dichotomy with Brent about 'alive' and 'life':
'conscious' and
On 21 Sep 2013, at 22:59, meekerdb wrote:
On 9/21/2013 7:37 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
The content might be, There is a flying pink elephant in my
room. which is both dubitable and almost certainly false. And
if the thought is, I had a conscious thought. that too is
dubitable.
We
The most interesting and less known work of Popper is the foundation of
evolutionary epistemology
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/epistemology-evolutionary/
which is much more ambitious that falsacionism and mere demarcation and is
far far more interesting.
2013/9/20 Bruno Marchal
On 21 September 2013 12:15, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 9/20/2013 3:53 PM, LizR wrote:
On 21 September 2013 05:48, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 9/20/2013 9:53 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Note also that Truth, by definition cannot be Popperian: it is not
falsifiable,
On 20 Sep 2013, at 19:48, meekerdb wrote:
On 9/20/2013 9:53 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Note also that Truth, by definition cannot be Popperian: it is not
falsifiable, of course. That's a common point with consciousness
here-and-now, which is not falsifiable nor doubtable, yet true
(except
On 9/21/2013 7:37 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
The content might be, There is a flying pink elephant in my room. which is both
dubitable and almost certainly false. And if the thought is, I had a conscious
thought. that too is dubitable.
We agree on this. The indubitable thought is not I was
On 9/20/2013 9:53 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Note also that Truth, by definition cannot be Popperian: it is not falsifiable, of
course. That's a common point with consciousness here-and-now, which is not
falsifiable nor doubtable, yet true (except for the zombies of course). OK?
I think that
On 21 September 2013 05:48, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 9/20/2013 9:53 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Note also that Truth, by definition cannot be Popperian: it is not
falsifiable, of course. That's a common point with consciousness
here-and-now, which is not falsifiable nor
On 9/20/2013 3:53 PM, LizR wrote:
On 21 September 2013 05:48, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net
mailto:meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 9/20/2013 9:53 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Note also that Truth, by definition cannot be Popperian: it is not
falsifiable, of
course. That's a common
10 matches
Mail list logo
