Hi everyone,
This is my first post on the List. I find this topic fascinating and
I'm impressed with everyone's thoughts about it. I'm not sure if
you're aware of this, but it has been discussed on a few other
Everything threads.
Norman Samish posted the following to the thread Tipler Weighs In
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 03:12:31PM -0700, David Nyman wrote:
This paper presents some intriguing ideas on consciousness, computation and
the MWI, including an argument against the possibility of consciousness
supervening on any single deterministic computer program (Bruno might find
this
On 19 Sep 2011, at 08:27, nihil0 wrote:
Hi everyone,
This is my first post on the List. I find this topic fascinating and
I'm impressed with everyone's thoughts about it. I'm not sure if
you're aware of this, but it has been discussed on a few other
Everything threads.
Norman Samish posted
On Sep 19, 1:28 am, Stephen P. King stephe...@charter.net wrote:
I give number and their physical implementation an equal
ontological status, they are independent of each other in that their
behaviours are independent but co-existence the same way that we see in
the Stone duality between
Hi!
On 9/19/2011 5:24 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 19 Sep 2011, at 08:27, nihil0 wrote:
Hi everyone,
This is my first post on the List. I find this topic fascinating and
I'm impressed with everyone's thoughts about it. I'm not sure if
you're aware of this, but it has been discussed on a few
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 1:27 AM, nihil0 jonathan.wol...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everyone,
This is my first post on the List. I find this topic fascinating and
I'm impressed with everyone's thoughts about it. I'm not sure if
you're aware of this, but it has been discussed on a few other
On 9/19/2011 3:20 AM, Russell Standish wrote:
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 03:12:31PM -0700, David Nyman wrote:
This paper presents some intriguing ideas on consciousness, computation and
the MWI, including an argument against the possibility of consciousness
supervening on any single deterministic
On 9/19/2011 11:19 AM, Jason Resch wrote:
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 1:27 AM, nihil0 jonathan.wol...@gmail.com
mailto:jonathan.wol...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everyone,
This is my first post on the List. I find this topic fascinating and
I'm impressed with everyone's thoughts about it.
On Sep 19, 2011, at 12:22 PM, Stephen P. King
stephe...@charter.net wrote:
On 9/19/2011 11:19 AM, Jason Resch wrote:
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 1:27 AM, nihil0 jonathan.wol...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi everyone,
This is my first post on the List. I find this topic fascinating and
I'm
On 18 Sep 2011, at 19:24, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Sep 18, 11:55 am, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 18 Sep 2011, at 06:13, Craig Weinberg wrote:
Accounting is not explaining. Which actually sums up my entire
position on this endless thread. Consciousness explains and counts.
On 18 Sep 2011, at 19:49, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Sep 18, 12:00 pm, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 17 Sep 2011, at 19:07, Stephen P. King wrote:
You seem posit as primitive some form of number and then build a
structure upon it that serves as an explanatory model for
On Sep 19, 1:22 pm, Stephen P. King stephe...@charter.net wrote:
On 9/19/2011 11:19 AM, Jason Resch wrote:
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 1:27 AM, nihil0 jonathan.wol...@gmail.com
mailto:jonathan.wol...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everyone,
This is my first post on the List. I find this
On 9/19/2011 8:19 AM, Jason Resch wrote:
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 1:27 AM, nihil0 jonathan.wol...@gmail.com
mailto:jonathan.wol...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everyone,
This is my first post on the List. I find this topic fascinating and
I'm impressed with everyone's thoughts about it.
On 9/19/2011 2:18 PM, Jason Resch wrote:
On Sep 19, 2011, at 12:22 PM, Stephen P. King stephe...@charter.net
mailto:stephe...@charter.net wrote:
On 9/19/2011 11:19 AM, Jason Resch wrote:
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 1:27 AM, nihil0 jonathan.wol...@gmail.com
mailto:jonathan.wol...@gmail.com
On Sep 19, 2011, at 2:59 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 9/19/2011 8:19 AM, Jason Resch wrote:
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 1:27 AM, nihil0 jonathan.wol...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi everyone,
This is my first post on the List. I find this topic fascinating and
I'm impressed with
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 2:13 PM, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.com wrote:
Evolution follows from the fact that DNA replication is not 100%
accurate and if the resulting organism is successful the mutation will
be propagated. This can lead to surprising results but not magical
results.
16 matches
Mail list logo