On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 11:20 PM, Russell Standish
li...@hpcoders.com.au wrote:
I'd only ever seen numerical simulations of it, but consulting the
ever-handy Wikipedia, it looks like the percolation threshold is given
by the inverse of the average node degree for Erdos-Renyi random
graphs.
On 22 Oct 2013, at 19:01, meekerdb wrote:
On 10/22/2013 5:48 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 21 Oct 2013, at 20:07, meekerdb wrote:
On 10/20/2013 11:12 PM, Russell Standish wrote:
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 08:09:59PM -0700, meekerdb wrote:
Consistency is []p ~[]~p. I was saying []p ~p, ie
On 22 Oct 2013, at 19:07, meekerdb wrote:
On 10/22/2013 6:19 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
[]p - p is correctness. It is trivially true for the machine I
consider, because they are correct by definition/choice.
Consistency is correctness on the f: []f - f. It is a very
particular case of
On 22 Oct 2013, at 22:50, Russell Standish wrote:
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 03:09:03PM +0200, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 21 Oct 2013, at 23:03, Russell Standish wrote:
In fact p- []p characterizes sigma_1 completeness (by a result
by
Albert Visser), and that is why to get the proba on the
We all dreams in the mind of God, even, paradoxically, God himself?
On Oct 22, 2013, at 9:52 PM, Samiya Illias samiyaill...@gmail.com wrote:
No, not criticizing!
This poem seems to express the question more comprehensibly, and I just
wanted to see what others think of it?
The idea that
A deterministic system cannot grant free will, and a system with free will
cannot choose to become deterministic; however, each is capable of an
arbitrarily convincing simulation of the other.
So how would you know where it began?
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 8:09 AM, Craig Weinberg
Your soulmate is the one on the opposite side of the Möbius strip.
Of course, if that's true, then there's probably an even bigger Möbius
strip inside an even bigger Möbius strip etc...
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group.
To
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dialetheism
Dialetheism is the view that some statements can be both true and false
simultaneously. More precisely, it is the belief that there can be a true
statement whose negation is also true. Such statements are called true
contradictions, or dialetheia.
Bruno, Are you saying that 1) negates digital physics? If so can you
explain how for dummies?
Richard
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 8:44 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 23 Oct 2013, at 02:15, Chris de Morsella wrote:
** **
** **
*From:* everything-list@googlegroups.com [
On Wednesday, October 23, 2013 9:39:31 AM UTC-4, Stephen Lin wrote:
A deterministic system cannot grant free will, and a system with free
will cannot choose to become deterministic; however, each is capable of an
arbitrarily convincing simulation of the other.
A system with free will can
On 22 Oct 2013, at 20:56, Quentin Anciaux wrote to John Clark
(I comment both)
2013/10/22 John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 6:03 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net
wrote:
On 10/21/2013 9:16 AM, John Clark wrote:
Let me put it in this way: accepting that P(W)
On 23 Oct 2013, at 17:39, Craig Weinberg wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dialetheism
Dialetheism is the view that some statements can be both true and
false simultaneously. More precisely, it is the belief that there
can be a true statement whose negation is also true. Such statements
Gien all of that, can you explain red/green vision? Then what happens to
yelow??
(Did hear someone way loops?)
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 11:07 AM, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.comwrote:
On Wednesday, October 23, 2013 12:34:05 PM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 23 Oct 2013, at 17:39,
Wait I accideally replied to all! EVERYONE FORGET I METNIONED THAT NAME
MING.
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 1:27 PM, Stephen Lin sw...@post.harvard.edu wrote:
Ming? Was that you???
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 11:07 AM, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.comwrote:
On Wednesday, October 23, 2013
http://medicalxpress.com/news/2013-10-neural-brain-harder-disrupt-aware.html
We consciously perceive just a small part of the information processed in
the brain – but which information in the brain remains unconscious and
which reaches our consciousness remains a mystery. However,
I will be reading this as soon as I get the time, I mean the emergent
phenomenon...but thought in the meantime you guys might be interested :-)
https://medium.com/the-physics-arxiv-blog/d5d3dc850933
I may have comments once I've had a chance to read it!
--
You received this message because
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 03:02:55PM +0200, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 22 Oct 2013, at 22:50, Russell Standish wrote:
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 03:09:03PM +0200, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 21 Oct 2013, at 23:03, Russell Standish wrote:
In fact p- []p characterizes sigma_1 completeness (by a
color blindness? not sure what the connection is.
On Wednesday, October 23, 2013 4:25:48 PM UTC-4, Stephen Lin wrote:
Gien all of that, can you explain red/green vision? Then what happens to
yelow??
(Did hear someone way loops?)
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 11:07 AM, Craig Weinberg
you do now!
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 1:52 PM, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.comwrote:
color blindness? not sure what the connection is.
On Wednesday, October 23, 2013 4:25:48 PM UTC-4, Stephen Lin wrote:
Gien all of that, can you explain red/green vision? Then what happens to
There, I just did it again. Baby BAby I just idd i t again.
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Stephen Lin sw...@post.harvard.edu wrote:
Wait I accideally replied to all! EVERYONE FORGET I METNIONED THAT NAME
MING.
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 1:27 PM, Stephen Lin sw...@post.harvard.eduwrote:
Ooops, I did it again, I played with your heart.
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 8:39 AM, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.comwrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dialetheism
Dialetheism is the view that some statements can be both true and false
simultaneously. More precisely, it is the belief that
Ming, stop confusing my taste buds, we're trying to have a serious
conversation here..
Same with you, Lusi, Sherry, Mark, and Schonmei
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 1:27 PM, Stephen Lin sw...@post.harvard.edu wrote:
Ming? Was that you???
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 11:07 AM, Craig Weinberg
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to
Go meet Roger
Please stop the spamming.
2013/10/23 Stephen Lin sw...@post.harvard.edu
Ooops, I did it again, I played with your heart.
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 8:39 AM, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.comwrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dialetheism
Dialetheism is the view that
Nice, but there is no need for the quote marks in the title. (It is a
metaphor and not a simile, if that's your problem.)
By the way I'm not sure if you can nest Mobius strips. Can you?
On 24 October 2013 02:42, Stephen Lin sw...@post.harvard.edu wrote:
Your soulmate is the one on the
Well, as a bit of a Platonist myself (especially on days with no 'R' in
them), I'm glad to know that's been settled after 2000-odd years of debate.
(Coming soon, how the shape of my coffee cup demonstrates dialectical
materialism.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
On 10/23/2013 5:53 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 22 Oct 2013, at 19:01, meekerdb wrote:
On 10/22/2013 5:48 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 21 Oct 2013, at 20:07, meekerdb wrote:
On 10/20/2013 11:12 PM, Russell Standish wrote:
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 08:09:59PM -0700, meekerdb wrote:
Sounds like comp with added poetry (not that comp needs added poetry).
On 24 October 2013 02:37, Stephen Lin stephenw...@gmail.com wrote:
We all dreams in the mind of God, even, paradoxically, God himself?
On Oct 22, 2013, at 9:52 PM, Samiya Illias samiyaill...@gmail.com wrote:
No, not
Time emerges from entanglement, at the end the paper indicates time
emerging from photons. I wonder if the paper is having fun with us, via
spooky action at a distance? No entanglement, no time and no photons,
no time? So if one is in an underground mine, switch the lights off,
and then time
On 10/23/2013 6:42 AM, Stephen Lin wrote:
Your soulmate is the one on the opposite side of the Möbius strip.
Of course, if that's true, then there's probably an even bigger Möbius strip inside an
even bigger Möbius strip etc...
Which side is the inside?
Brent
--
You received this message
Both.
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 2:52 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 10/23/2013 6:42 AM, Stephen Lin wrote:
Your soulmate is the one on the opposite side of the Möbius strip.
Of course, if that's true, then there's probably an even bigger Möbius
strip inside an even bigger
I've read the precis but not the paper itself, so I can't comment on that
(assuming I will be able to when i HAVE read it...!)
But if time emerges from entanglement, that doesn't just involve photons,
everything can be entangled with everything else - this is the basis of the
MWI, I believe (for
On 10/23/2013 9:34 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 23 Oct 2013, at 17:39, Craig Weinberg wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dialetheism
Dialetheism is the view that some statements can be both true and false simultaneously.
More precisely, it is the belief that there can be a true statement
Stephen Lin - I may be forced to create a filter to automatically delete
your messages if you don't have anything sensible to say. Do you?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails
Yes the article mentioned the W-D equation, that's what the idea is based
on.
On 24 October 2013 11:14, Jason Resch jasonre...@gmail.com wrote:
Here is a video on the same topic:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ogiQ2E6n0U
According to the video the result has been implied since 1967, with
Yes I did.
Tomorrow this will be harder but today this is the easiest thing in the
world. Bill Murray? Andie MacDowell? Yes I said yes I will Yes.
Stream of consciousness? Yes, already, after the ghosts in the shells it's
not that easy to be a turtle who's green? Red/green color vision.
Cogito
If anyone is still in doubt that Mr Lin is trolling, try googling Tomorrow
this will be harder but today this is the easiest thing in the world. Bill
Murray? Andie MacDowell? Yes I said yes I will Yes. (including the quote
marks).
As you will see, the most sensible response to this is Oh, cr*p -
On 10/23/2013 3:13 PM, LizR wrote:
On 24 October 2013 04:39, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.com
mailto:whatsons...@gmail.com wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dialetheism
Dialetheism is the view that some statements can be both true and false
simultaneously. More
Wisdom is the art of coming up with believable excuses for one's ignorance.
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 4:25 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 10/23/2013 3:13 PM, LizR wrote:
On 24 October 2013 04:39, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 4:25 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 10/23/2013 3:13 PM, LizR wrote:
On 24 October 2013 04:39, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.com wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dialetheism
Dialetheism is the view that some statements can be both true and false
Whereever you go, there you are!
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 4:17 PM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
If anyone is still in doubt that Mr Lin is trolling, try googling
Tomorrow this will be harder but today this is the easiest thing in the
world. Bill Murray? Andie MacDowell? Yes I said yes I will
Always take the weather with you. I feel a spam filter coming on.
On 24 October 2013 12:29, Stephen Lin sw...@post.harvard.edu wrote:
Whereever you go, there you are!
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 4:17 PM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
If anyone is still in doubt that Mr Lin is trolling, try
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Bruno Marchal
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 5:45 AM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: String theory and superconductors and classical liquids...
On 23 Oct 2013, at 02:15,
Are you the famous basketball player from Harvard, then the Knicks and now
elsewhere.?
Sorry I lost track of you.
Richard
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Stephen Lin sw...@post.harvard.edu wrote:
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List
This is better:
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?shva=1#label/everything-list/141e79c24d12e062http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?t=634170
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 4:31 PM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
Always take the weather with you. I feel a spam filter coming on.
On 24
I have the perfect James Joyce!
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Stephen Lin sw...@post.harvard.edu wrote:
This is better:
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?shva=1#label/everything-list/141e79c24d12e062http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?t=634170
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at
This is better:
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?shva=1#label/everything-list/141e79c24d12e062http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?t=634170
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 4:31 PM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
Always take the weather with you. I feel a spam filter coming on.
On 24
And neither
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Stephen Lin
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 3:10 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: A metaphor for true love:
Both.
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 2:52 PM, meekerdb
The answer is that you do not have a soulmate
in agreement with Theosophy and all religions.
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 8:23 PM, Chris de Morsella cdemorse...@yahoo.comwrote:
And neither
** **
*From:* everything-list@googlegroups.com [mailto:
everything-list@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf
Agreed based on Theosophy and Judaism.
Not sure about other religions.
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 8:53 PM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
Or possibly you are your soulmate.
On 24 October 2013 13:34, Richard Ruquist yann...@gmail.com wrote:
The answer is that you do not have a soulmate
in
I was thinking of The Egg.
On 24 October 2013 14:15, Richard Ruquist yann...@gmail.com wrote:
Agreed based on Theosophy and Judaism.
Not sure about other religions.
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 8:53 PM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
Or possibly you are your soulmate.
On 24 October 2013
Stephen Lin.
A new bike?
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 19:43:32 -0400
Subject: Re: What's my name and what do you think I need to help me along my
journey?
From: yann...@gmail.com
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Are you the famous basketball player from Harvard, then the Knicks and now
Anyone who's been banned from the Straight Dope forum probably needs a
dose of reality to help them on their way.
On 24 October 2013 15:42, chris peck chris_peck...@hotmail.com wrote:
Stephen Lin.
A new bike?
--
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 19:43:32 -0400
Subject:
Two apparently distinct ontological distinctions:
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/species/#SpeInd vs
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/species/#SpeSet
After the development of set theory, however, a distinction of the
scholastics between intension, of sets that were circumscribed by
On Wednesday, October 23, 2013 6:13:33 PM UTC-4, Liz R wrote:
On 24 October 2013 04:39, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com javascript:
wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dialetheism
Dialetheism is the view that some statements can be both true and false
simultaneously. More precisely,
Emergence, entanglement, and time make more sense as divergence,
disentanglement, and nested frequency ranges of experience, IMO.
On Wednesday, October 23, 2013 5:53:20 PM UTC-4, spudb...@aol.com wrote:
Time emerges from entanglement, at the end the paper indicates time
emerging from
Ontological status is always within some model we have created. So one can created models
in which species are defined extenstionally and create different models in which they are
defined intensionally. So what? They are both our creations to help understand the
world. Does one work better?
It seems biologists (and philosophers of biology) think that Kitcher's
motivation for asserting that species are sets is to allow spatiotemporally
unrestricted groups of organisms to form species. That motivation, however,
is not substantiated by biological theory or practice. Species as sets
(see
Do not bother with the physics blog.
It contains many errors.
Go to arVix.com for the original paper
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 11:59 PM, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.comwrote:
Emergence, entanglement, and time make more sense as divergence,
disentanglement, and nested frequency ranges of
59 matches
Mail list logo
