On Tuesday, June 5, 2018 at 1:18:29 AM UTC, Bruce wrote:
>
> From: >
>
>
> Remember that the analysis I have given above is schematic, representing
> the general progression of unitary evolution. It is not specific to any
> particular case, or any particular number of possible outcomes for the
From: mailto:agrayson2...@gmail.com>>
On Tuesday, June 5, 2018 at 7:03:28 AM UTC, Bruce wrote:
From:
On Tuesday, June 5, 2018 at 1:18:29 AM UTC, Bruce wrote:
From:
Remember that the analysis I have given above is schematic,
representing the general
> Il 5 giugno 2018 alle 5.05 Bruce Kellett ha
> scritto:
>
> From: mailto:agrayson2...@gmail.com >
>
> > >
> > On Tuesday, June 5, 2018 at 1:18:29 AM UTC, Bruce wrote:
> >
> > > > > From:
> > >
> > > > > > >
> > > >
From: mailto:agrayson2...@gmail.com>>
On Tuesday, June 5, 2018 at 1:18:29 AM UTC, Bruce wrote:
From:
Remember that the analysis I have given above is schematic,
representing the general progression of unitary evolution. It is
not specific to any particular case, or any
On Tuesday, June 5, 2018 at 7:03:28 AM UTC, Bruce wrote:
>
> From: >
>
>
> On Tuesday, June 5, 2018 at 1:18:29 AM UTC, Bruce wrote:
>>
>> From:
>>
>>
>> Remember that the analysis I have given above is schematic, representing
>> the general progression of unitary evolution. It is not specific
On Tuesday, June 5, 2018 at 9:05:13 AM UTC, Bruce wrote:
>
> From: >
>
>
> On Tuesday, June 5, 2018 at 7:03:28 AM UTC, Bruce wrote:
>>
>> From:
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday, June 5, 2018 at 1:18:29 AM UTC, Bruce wrote:
>>>
>>> From:
>>>
>>>
>>> Remember that the analysis I have given above is
On 4 June 2018 at 23:48, Brent Meeker wrote:
>
>
> On 6/4/2018 7:13 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
>
> I am very grateful for mother medicine, but
> we should not pretend that its operative assumptions solve the
> fundamental questions.
>
> What fundamental question do you refer to? How to detect
On 4 June 2018 at 17:11, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>> On 3 Jun 2018, at 20:40, Telmo Menezes wrote:
>>
>> On 2 June 2018 at 17:10, John Clark wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 3:15 AM, Telmo Menezes
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I'd like to see Bruno actually quote some well known philosophers or
On 4 June 2018 at 20:30, Brent Meeker wrote:
>
>
> On 6/4/2018 3:13 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
>>
>> Most scientists and scientifically-literate people I know assume that
>> consciousness emerges from brain activity without ever really thinking
>> about the ramifications of this hypothesis. I have
On 6/5/2018 2:05 AM, Bruce Kellett wrote:
From: mailto:agrayson2...@gmail.com>>
On Tuesday, June 5, 2018 at 7:03:28 AM UTC, Bruce wrote:
From:
On Tuesday, June 5, 2018 at 1:18:29 AM UTC, Bruce wrote:
From:
Remember that the analysis I have given above is
On 6/5/2018 2:48 AM, agrayson2...@gmail.com wrote:
*One objective was to convince myself whether the wf you have written
for decoherence makes any sense. Originally I thought one needed
mutual interference of all components for it to be viable. I doubted
whether each component interferes
On 6/5/2018 7:58 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
If I understand correctly, you define free-will as the ability to act
independently from other people, biological instincts and so on. My
problem is that free-will must be free from something. I can accept it
as a relative concept -- my free-will in
On 6/5/2018 8:12 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
On 4 June 2018 at 20:30, Brent Meeker wrote:
On 6/4/2018 3:13 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
Most scientists and scientifically-literate people I know assume that
consciousness emerges from brain activity without ever really thinking
about the
On 6/5/2018 7:42 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
On 4 June 2018 at 23:48, Brent Meeker wrote:
On 6/4/2018 7:13 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
I am very grateful for mother medicine, but
we should not pretend that its operative assumptions solve the
fundamental questions.
What fundamental question do
On Tuesday, June 5, 2018 at 7:02:11 PM UTC, Brent wrote:
>
>
>
> On 6/5/2018 2:48 AM, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> *One objective was to convince myself whether the wf you have written for
> decoherence makes any sense. Originally I thought one needed mutual
> interference of all components
From: mailto:agrayson2...@gmail.com>>
On Tuesday, June 5, 2018 at 7:02:11 PM UTC, Brent wrote:
On 6/5/2018 2:48 AM, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
*One objective was to convince myself whether the wf you have
written for decoherence makes any sense. Originally I thought one
On 6/5/2018 5:05 PM, Bruce Kellett wrote:
From: mailto:agrayson2...@gmail.com>>
On Tuesday, June 5, 2018 at 7:02:11 PM UTC, Brent wrote:
On 6/5/2018 2:48 AM, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
*One objective was to convince myself whether the wf you have
written for decoherence makes
17 matches
Mail list logo
