As I stuff my head with the bird menagerie, and try to see if I need to
breed a new bird, I find that EC is best thought of as a form of
combinatorics (as you thought, Bruno!).
Is there anyone out there who has any intuitions as to which bird(s) would
correspond to 'coherence' or 'symmetry breaki
Bruno Marchal wrote:
> Le 11-nov.-06, à 01:09, 1Z a écrit :
>
> > No, because there are no possible worlds where (2^32582657)-1
> > is not a prime number.
>
> This is for me a typical "arithmetical realist" statement.
Most philosophers who use the "possible
worlds" terminology do nothing PW's a
Le 11-nov.-06, à 01:09, 1Z a écrit :
> No, because there are no possible worlds where (2^32582657)-1
> is not a prime number.
This is for me a typical "arithmetical realist" statement.
> Causality , as opposed
> to material implication, requires contingency.
Yes. And grosso modo there will
Tom Caylor writes:
> Brent Meeker wrote:
> > OK. But I'd say that in fact almost no one believes something without any
> > evidence, i.e. on *blind* faith. Religious faith is usually belief based
> > on *selected* evidence; it is "faith" because it is contrary to the total
> > evidence. B
4 matches
Mail list logo
