On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 12:52 AM, Brent Meeker wrote:
> On 2/13/2011 10:13 PM, Jason Resch wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Brent Meeker wrote:
>
>> On 2/13/2011 5:21 AM, 1Z wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Feb 12, 3:18 am, Brent Meeker wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
What do you think the chances
On 2/13/2011 10:13 PM, Jason Resch wrote:
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Brent Meeker
mailto:meeke...@dslextreme.com>> wrote:
On 2/13/2011 5:21 AM, 1Z wrote:
On Feb 12, 3:18 am, Brent Meekermailto:meeke...@dslextreme.com>> wrote:
What do you think
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 7:46 PM, 1Z wrote:
>
>
> On Feb 12, 9:05 am, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
> > 2011/2/12 1Z
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > On Feb 11, 11:50 pm, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
> > > > 2011/2/11 1Z
> >
> > > > > On Feb 10, 1:24 pm, Bruno Marchal wrote:
> > > > > > On 09 Feb 2011, at 16:49,
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Brent Meeker wrote:
> On 2/13/2011 5:21 AM, 1Z wrote:
>
>>
>> On Feb 12, 3:18 am, Brent Meeker wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> What do you think the chances are that any random object in
>> Plato's heaven, or any random Turing machine will support intelligent
>> life
On 2/13/2011 3:29 PM, John Mikes wrote:
Since the Honored Listers refrain from signing their remarks, it is
hard to decipher to whom I write: Brent, Stathis, maybe others who
just barged in?
So I go topical. First: randomness in the mind.
I am functionally against the term because it would elim
Since the Honored Listers refrain from signing their remarks, it is hard to
decipher to whom I write: Brent, Stathis, maybe others who just barged in?
So I go topical. First: randomness in the mind.
I am functionally against the term because it would eliminate all
logical consequence and order wha
Hi Bruno,
-Original Message-
From: Bruno Marchal
Sent: Sunday, February 13, 2011 3:48 AM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Multisolipsism
On 13 Feb 2011, at 09:23, Stephen Paul King wrote:
I am very interested in this question as it directly relates to my
question
On 2/13/2011 5:21 AM, 1Z wrote:
On Feb 12, 3:18 am, Brent Meeker wrote:
What do you think the chances are that any random object in
Plato's heaven, or any random Turing machine will support intelligent life?
1 in 10, 1 in 1000, 1 in a billion?
Zero.
Does that allow us
On Feb 12, 3:18 am, Brent Meeker wrote:
> >>> What do you think the chances are that any random object in
> >>> Plato's heaven, or any random Turing machine will support intelligent
> >>> life?
> >>> 1 in 10, 1 in 1000, 1 in a billion?
>
> Zero.
Does that allow us to argue:
1) A universe sel
On Feb 12, 3:02 am, Charles wrote:
> > That's a bit simplistic. The nett result of EPR/Bell/Aspect is either-
> > indeterminism-or-nonlocal-hidden-variable. If NLHV's can be disproved,
> > that proves indeterminism
>
> Actually there is a third alternative, which is to take the time
> symmetry o
On 13 Feb 2011, at 09:23, Stephen Paul King wrote:
Hi Bruno,
-Original Message- From: Bruno Marchal
Sent: Sunday, February 13, 2011 3:00 AM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Multisolipsism
Hi Stephen,
On 10 Feb 2011, at 16:33, Stephen Paul King wrote:
Hi Bruno and
Hi Bruno,
-Original Message-
From: Bruno Marchal
Sent: Sunday, February 13, 2011 3:00 AM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Multisolipsism
Hi Stephen,
On 10 Feb 2011, at 16:33, Stephen Paul King wrote:
Hi Bruno and Brent,
-Original Message- From: Bruno March
Hi Stephen,
On 10 Feb 2011, at 16:33, Stephen Paul King wrote:
Hi Bruno and Brent,
-Original Message- From: Bruno Marchal
Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2011 9:35 AM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Multisolipsism
On 09 Feb 2011, at 20:51, Brent Meeker wrote:
On 2/9
13 matches
Mail list logo
