Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 25 Aug 2011, at 14:03, benjayk wrote:
Bruno Marchal wrote:
Aren't you restricting your notion of
what is explainable of what your own theory labels explainable with
its own
assumptions?
Yes, but this is due to its TOE aspect: it explains what
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 12:31 AM, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.com wrote:
Feeling doesn't come from a substance, it's the first person
experience of energy itself. Substance is the third person
presentation of energy patterns. If you turn it around so that feeling
is observed in third
On 22 Aug 2011, at 21:54, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Aug 22, 1:30 pm, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 20 Aug 2011, at 23:48, Craig Weinberg wrote:
PART I
On Aug 20, 12:16 pm, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 20 Aug 2011, at 03:14, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Aug 18,
On 22 Aug 2011, at 22:20, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Aug 22, 1:56 pm, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 21 Aug 2011, at 15:28, Craig Weinberg wrote:
My point is that, by definition of philosophical zombie, they
behave
like normal and sane human being. It is not walking coma, or
On Aug 26, 9:05 am, Stathis Papaioannou stath...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 12:31 AM, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.com
wrote:
Feeling doesn't come from a substance, it's the first person
experience of energy itself. Substance is the third person
presentation of energy
On 8/26/2011 1:14 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
That's the problem. You're interested in the wrong thing. Cells and
organsims are not billiard balls. If you treat them as predictable
mechanisms, you lose the very dimension that you are trying to
emulate.
It's not a question of treating them as
On Aug 26, 11:01 am, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 22 Aug 2011, at 22:20, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Aug 22, 1:56 pm, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 21 Aug 2011, at 15:28, Craig Weinberg wrote:
My point is that, by definition of philosophical zombie, they
On Aug 26, 4:38 pm, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 8/26/2011 1:14 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
That's the problem. You're interested in the wrong thing. Cells and
organsims are not billiard balls. If you treat them as predictable
mechanisms, you lose the very dimension that you are
On 8/26/2011 4:41 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Aug 26, 4:38 pm, meekerdbmeeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 8/26/2011 1:14 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
That's the problem. You're interested in the wrong thing. Cells and
organsims are not billiard balls. If you treat them as predictable
9 matches
Mail list logo
