So what are Coulomb force waves?
On 24 May 2014 04:36, John Ross wrote:
> Coulomb’s Law applies to static charges. In this case the charge is not
> stationary. It is traveling in a circle at pi/2 times c. The Coulomb
> force has to be integrated around the circle. The integrated force ends
On 5/23/2014 9:45 PM, Kim Jones wrote:
I mean, it is said to be quasi-impossible for beings to cross the vast
inter-galactic distances and this is the main argument used in answer to
Fermi's Paradox, yet are we not almost certainly - to take a leaf out of
GHibbsa's manual momentarily - unconsc
Actually, the below quoted text I was responding to was by Bruno.
Kim
>
>> On 23 May 2014, at 10:00 pm, ghib...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> I've been saying that it isn't necessary to refute something that contains
>> no knowledge about something fundamental to its claim. Consciousness was
>> n
> On 23 May 2014, at 10:00 pm, ghib...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> I've been saying that it isn't necessary to refute something that contains no
> knowledge about something fundamental to its claim. Consciousness was never
> understood...and it's reasonable to think it is the more important mystery of
On 23 May 2014, at 15:52, ghib...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday, May 22, 2014 8:12:59 AM UTC+1, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 21 May 2014, at 22:02, spudboy100 via Everything List wrote:
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: LizR
> To: everything-list
> Sent: Sun, May 18, 2014 9:26 pm
> Subjec
My book is an easy read and I will send one a free one.
John R
-Original Message-
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Russell Standish
Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2014 6:35 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: TRONNIES
Thanks Brent!!!
I was actually pretty good in high school algebra. That was a long time ago.
John R
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of meekerdb
Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2014 6:04 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subjec
I will spend some time this weekend on time dilation.
John R
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of meekerdb
Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2014 5:57 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: TRONNIES
On 5/22/2014 4:53 PM, John
If time does not pass more slowly when the muons go fast why is their life
span longer?
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of LizR
Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2014 5:43 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: TRONNIES
On 2
Coulomb’s Law applies to static charges. In this case the charge is not
stationary. It is traveling in a circle at pi/2 times c. The Coulomb force
has to be integrated around the circle. The integrated force ends up with
energy/mass units.
John Ross
From: everything-list@googlegroups
On 23 May 2014, at 14:22, ghib...@gmail.com wrote:
On Friday, May 23, 2014 1:00:26 PM UTC+1, ghi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Friday, May 23, 2014 9:03:00 AM UTC+1, Kim Jones wrote:
> On 22 May 2014, at 11:57 pm, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
> Can you at least confirm that you pretend to have a refutat
On Friday, May 23, 2014 2:44:31 PM UTC+1, ghi...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
> On Thursday, May 22, 2014 9:57:25 PM UTC+1, Brent wrote:
>
> On 5/22/2014 12:59 PM, John Clark wrote:
>
>
> Why not? No physicist is going to take your theory seriously or even
> call it a theory if you can't calculate wi
On 23 May 2014, at 14:00, ghib...@gmail.com wrote:
On Friday, May 23, 2014 9:03:00 AM UTC+1, Kim Jones wrote:
> On 22 May 2014, at 11:57 pm, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
> Can you at least confirm that you pretend to have a refutation of
comp
The word 'pretend' here is a "false friend". Bruno
Kim,
On 23 May 2014, at 10:02, Kim Jones wrote:
On 22 May 2014, at 11:57 pm, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Can you at least confirm that you pretend to have a refutation of
comp
The word 'pretend' here is a "false friend". Bruno is assuming that
this word works the same in English as in French
On 23 May 2014, at 06:30, LizR wrote:
On 23 May 2014 15:55, John Clark wrote:
> I am not sure what is meant by time dilation.
GOOD GOD!!! Is anyone still unsure about John Ross being a crackpot?
Yeah, I have to admit that rather put a dent in whatever credibility
he had.
Sorry, Mr Ross,
On Thursday, May 22, 2014 8:12:59 AM UTC+1, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>
> On 21 May 2014, at 22:02, spudboy100 via Everything List wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: LizR >
> > To: everything-list >
> > Sent: Sun, May 18, 2014 9:26 pm
> > Subject: Re: Is Consciousness Co
On Thursday, May 22, 2014 9:57:25 PM UTC+1, Brent wrote:
>
> On 5/22/2014 12:59 PM, John Clark wrote:
>
>
> Why not? No physicist is going to take your theory seriously or even
> call it a theory if you can't calculate with it, if you can't get numbers
> out of it so it can be checked with o
On Friday, May 23, 2014 1:57:18 PM UTC+1, ghi...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
> On Friday, May 23, 2014 1:39:04 PM UTC+1, ghi...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Friday, May 23, 2014 1:22:34 PM UTC+1, ghi...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Friday, May 23, 2014 1:00:26 PM UTC+1, ghi...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
On Friday, May 23, 2014 1:39:04 PM UTC+1, ghi...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
> On Friday, May 23, 2014 1:22:34 PM UTC+1, ghi...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Friday, May 23, 2014 1:00:26 PM UTC+1, ghi...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Friday, May 23, 2014 9:03:00 AM UTC+1, Kim Jones wrote:
On Friday, May 23, 2014 1:22:34 PM UTC+1, ghi...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
> On Friday, May 23, 2014 1:00:26 PM UTC+1, ghi...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Friday, May 23, 2014 9:03:00 AM UTC+1, Kim Jones wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> > On 22 May 2014, at 11:57 pm, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Can you at le
On Friday, May 23, 2014 1:22:34 PM UTC+1, ghi...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
> On Friday, May 23, 2014 1:00:26 PM UTC+1, ghi...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Friday, May 23, 2014 9:03:00 AM UTC+1, Kim Jones wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> > On 22 May 2014, at 11:57 pm, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Can you at le
On Friday, May 23, 2014 1:00:26 PM UTC+1, ghi...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
> On Friday, May 23, 2014 9:03:00 AM UTC+1, Kim Jones wrote:
>>
>>
>> > On 22 May 2014, at 11:57 pm, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>> >
>> > Can you at least confirm that you pretend to have a refutation of comp
>>
>> The word 'prete
On Friday, May 23, 2014 9:03:00 AM UTC+1, Kim Jones wrote:
>
>
> > On 22 May 2014, at 11:57 pm, Bruno Marchal >
> wrote:
> >
> > Can you at least confirm that you pretend to have a refutation of comp
>
> The word 'pretend' here is a "false friend". Bruno is assuming that this
> word works the
On Friday, May 23, 2014 12:29:35 PM UTC+1, ghi...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
> On Friday, May 23, 2014 12:34:27 AM UTC+1, Liz R wrote:
>>
>> On 22 May 2014 23:48, wrote:
>>
>>> hmm..yeah you're right...ironical might not be the word.
>>>
>>
>> True, it's usually just "ironic".
>>
>
> nothing ironic a
On Friday, May 23, 2014 12:34:27 AM UTC+1, Liz R wrote:
>
> On 22 May 2014 23:48, > wrote:
>
>> hmm..yeah you're right...ironical might not be the word.
>>
>
> True, it's usually just "ironic".
>
nothing ironic about that
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google G
> On 22 May 2014, at 11:57 pm, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
> Can you at least confirm that you pretend to have a refutation of comp
The word 'pretend' here is a "false friend". Bruno is assuming that this word
works the same in English as in French. It doesn't.
He means only modestly "Can you at
26 matches
Mail list logo
