On Thursday, May 22, 2014 8:12:59 AM UTC+1, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>
> On 21 May 2014, at 22:02, spudboy100 via Everything List wrote: 
>
> > 
> > 
> > -----Original Message----- 
> > From: LizR <[email protected] <javascript:>> 
> > To: everything-list <[email protected] <javascript:>> 
> > Sent: Sun, May 18, 2014 9:26 pm 
> > Subject: Re: Is Consciousness Computable? 
> > 
> > On 19 May 2014 05:12, spudboy100 via Everything List &
> lt;[email protected] <javascript:> 
> > &gt; wrote: 
> >  So you do not have a testable, falsifiable, theory Bruno. Not in   
> > the scientific sense. 
>
>
> Could you tell me why? I have answered this to hibbsa since. What is   
> wrong with the equation which provides the propositional physics (its   
> logic of the observable) and its actual testing? 
>
 
Because you don't have one. Is anyone independent working on a prediction 
unique to your work? If they aren't, you don't have one. Doesn't mean you 
won't have one. But does mean you don't currently have a falsifiable 
theory. 
 

>
>
>
>
> > No one calls you on this.....here.....but then again.....let's face   
> > it no one answered my question either. 
>
> I did. 
>
 
You did. And you have many times before. But the question was, could anyone 
OTHER than you answer it. 
 
See that's the issue. I don't think anyone really understands whether you 
have a falsifiable prediction or not. And these things are 3p if you like. 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to