See? Here is a report from the University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands,
indicating the production of Hawking Radiation in the lab. This is a step in
unifying the quantum with GR. Minor, but significant.
Acceleration at the speed of (G)ravity is a bit unconfirmed, though widely,
accepted by the physics community to be the same as that of photons through an
absolute vacuum. Meanwhile, we can also address through relativity this
question: What is the aggregate speed of T = time? At a cosmological
Coordinate time variables dt = cosh(gs)ds and dx= sinh(gs)ds are such that
dt^2 - dx^2 = (cosh^2(gs) - sinh^2(gs))ds^2 = ds^2, and defines a flat
space metric for special relativity. These coordinates define an
accelerated frame with acceleration g.
LC
On Wednesday, November 16, 2022 at
Setting aside relativity for the nonce, the workability of transversable
wormholes is getting more, better!
https://journals.aps.org/prd/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevD.106.104024
Which, for some reason makes me ponder, if there is a Singularity, it may not
simply be computational, but based on space
Can Ref Frames be addressed with General Relativity, also? Travel very fast,
time slows down. Travel to a supermassive location, time slows down. The thing
then is time, which Julian Barbour says it doesn't exist-which I understand.
What exists is motion. Even motion at a quantum scale, like
You cannot take anything t'Rump says as real. Even words like "and" and
"the" are lies.
LC
On Wednesday, November 16, 2022 at 4:55:15 AM UTC-6 johnk...@gmail.com
wrote:
> Check out this article from The New York Times. Because I'm a subscriber,
> you can read it through this gift link
Accelerated frames can be addressed with special relativity.
LC
On Monday, November 14, 2022 at 2:14:46 PM UTC-6 agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
> EOM.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop
On 11/16/2022 8:20 AM, John Clark wrote:
On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 9:50 PM Alan Grayson
wrote:
/> Please answer the question defining this thread./
The answer is yes, provided that the acceleration is produced by a
force, such as you'd get with a rocket. In General Relativity gravity
On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 11:21 AM John Clark wrote:
>
>
> I don't understand the question, if they're both accelerating at the same
> rate then they're in the same reference frame.
>
There is no single canonical way to define an accelerating object's
non-inertial "reference frame" in relativity
On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 9:50 PM Alan Grayson wrote:
*> Please answer the question defining this thread.*
The answer is yes, provided that the acceleration is produced by a force,
such as you'd get with a rocket. In General Relativity gravity is not
considered a force, it's just the way things
Check out this article from The New York Times. Because I'm a subscriber,
you can read it through this gift link without a subscription.
We Fact-Checked Trump’s Speech
Former President Donald J. Trump made a number of claims about his policies
and President Biden’s record. We checked them for
And when I used the word "true", I just meant that no observations exist
which contradict the predictions of SR. AG
On Tuesday, November 15, 2022 at 11:09:25 PM UTC-7 Alan Grayson wrote:
>
> I just mean, if both frames are accelerating at the same rate, will the v
> in the LT, be the
12 matches
Mail list logo
