On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 11:21 AM John Clark <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
> I don't understand the question, if they're both accelerating at the same
> rate then they're in the same reference frame.
>


There is no single canonical way to define an accelerating object's
non-inertial "reference frame" in relativity so this isn't necessarily
true, for example the Rindler coordinate system discussed at
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rindler_coordinates involves a family of
clocks with different proper accelerations (and hence different coordinate
accelerations as seen in inertial frames), but in the Rindler frame they
are all at rest.





>
>
> John K Clark    See what's on my new list at  Extropolis
> <https://groups.google.com/g/extropolis>
>
> I1Il
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAJPayv1b26uhBxX_9PD57iM6YXmhxk%3DDhaEZNnoAYX6fUGnV3w%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAJPayv1b26uhBxX_9PD57iM6YXmhxk%3DDhaEZNnoAYX6fUGnV3w%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAPCWU3K_TLZN9omOPA5U5HYuMTQuEKeT1hzVifFO1c_uJvkm1A%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to