Setting aside relativity for the nonce, the workability of transversable wormholes is getting more, better! https://journals.aps.org/prd/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevD.106.104024 Which, for some reason makes me ponder, if there is a Singularity, it may not simply be computational, but based on space travel.Like a species that (if possible) achieves wormhole travel, discovers other habitats that are more appealing for them? My expectations as a possible Trump voting-primate,* are for tonight, get food, get out of the cold. Anyway, this seems to be an interesting paper and as with Einstein or ERP, a bullet train through the cosmos, gives me a moment for pause.
*I still like Ron D. better, but I am but a serf in an environment of globalist, autocratic, doyens. -----Original Message----- From: John Clark <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Tue, Nov 15, 2022 8:18 am Subject: Re: Is Special Relativity valid for accelerating frames of reference? TY. On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 6:38 AM Alan Grayson <[email protected]> wrote: > IHA = ? I Hate Acronyms. John K Clark See what's on my new list at Extropolis 8gfk -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAJPayv2zQ6%2Bt4%2BsmV9JPtRV_12w1nBFiZLHhaV7OPyYqzkqEsQ%40mail.gmail.com. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/785699322.724137.1668644737441%40mail.yahoo.com.
