as fMRI results have
sometimes been said to suggest that freewill does not exist. Haynes'
work perhaps suggests that mental decisions may be made much earlier
they are knowingly decided. Haynes does go a lot further than Libet's
work and my experiments and theory will give us some answers finally.
uv
.
(but) 'uv' seems to speak about concepts handled in the 'physical
world' science-view
Yes, up to a point.
uv
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group.
To post to this group, send
but probably that
cannot be helped.
uv
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group.
To post to this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email
Bruno said on FOR List(Subject: Re: Quantum Immortality (was Re:
Quantum Suicide)
That necessity is implied itself by the incompleteness phenomena,
but that is technical (ask me on the everything-list if interested).
Ok I am interested. Also (separate query) - How does your
approach tie in
]
Cc: uv [EMAIL PROTECTED]; everything-list@eskimo.com
Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2005 9:39 PM
Subject: Re: Question for Bruno
Russell Standish wrote on 13/11/2005
I noticed we'd crossed in the post. But please explain why time in
gaol and hypnogic myoclonus have different 1- and 3- effects?
Actually I think that one of my posts, the relevant one, has
disappeared altogether so I enclose a attachment of it. The
Bruno wrote on November 14, 2005 2:57 PM
The Universal Dovetailer Argument (UDA) *is* the proof that physics
is reducible to computer science. The proof is informal, non
mathematical, yet complete in itself.
I got indeed sort of quantum
logics, and I take this as a confirmation (not a
, that situation
is not surprising. Ultimately we may be led to category
theory for the mappings.
- Original Message -
From: Bruno Marchal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: uv [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Everything-List List everything-list@eskimo.com
Sent: Monday, November 14, 2005 3:02 PM
Subject: Re
Bruno said
For me, all questioning is amenable to science, or put in another
way, we can kept a scientific attitude, in all fields, including
those
asking for faith.
Fair enough, as long as we all know what a 'scientific attitude' is.
Kuhn, Popper, Wittgenstein, Derrida ???
Correct
Kim Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] said
Conversations with God by Neale Donald Walsch (Hodder and
Stoughton
1995) is a bloddy good read as we like to say here in Australia
I think myself that one problem with such books is that they are very
Christian oriented. I recently heard a lecture by David
1Z [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on August 29
The version of AR that is supported by comp
only makes a commitment about mind-independent *truth*. The idea
that the mind-independent truth of mathematical propositions
entails the mind-independent *existence* of mathematical objects is
a very
11 matches
Mail list logo
