The Emergence of Consciousness in the Quantum Universe

2011-03-10 Thread ronaldheld
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/1103/1103.1651v1.pdf
Here we go again.
 Ronald

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Everything List group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.



Re: The Emergence of Consciousness in the Quantum Universe

2011-03-10 Thread Stephen Paul King



-Original Message- 
From: ronaldheld

Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 7:18 AM
To: Everything List
Subject: The Emergence of Consciousness in the Quantum Universe


http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/1103/1103.1651v1.pdf
Here we go again.
Ronald


***

Hi Ronald!

   My first impression of this paper is that it is yet another attempt to 
reify the doctrine of dialectical materialism, then I wondered if the paper 
was the output of a science-word-salad-izer

but reading further I saw some gems:

Another implication of the current proposal is that there can be no 
self-aware mecha-
nized artificial intelligence no matter how advanced the technology becomes, 
since biological
intelligence is evolved as part of inter-connected universal evolution. A 
mechanical com-
puter’s CPU will never acquire free will, since it will never be able to 
establish the infinite
multitude of connections with the rest of the universe environment, as 
manifested in the
entanglement of the phases of the wave-functions (the Aharonov-Bohm effect). 
However,
entities formed through semi-biological pathways such as cloning are 
possible because they
tap into nature’s established pathways to establish these infinite 
connections.


   As my kids would say: OMG! LOL! /facepalm

   I would like to agree in principle with Zhang but I am not sure that 
s/he is not a Chinese Room!


Onward!

Stephen

PS, thanks for posting this reference


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Everything List group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.



Re: The Emergence of Consciousness in the Quantum Universe

2011-03-10 Thread Russell Standish
Thanks Stephen, for the warning. I guess the onus is on the author to
not sound like a crank! 

By the way, all the ligatures in your quote below displayed as a space
in my email reader, so it doubled the effect :(.

Cheers

On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 08:27:04AM -0500, Stephen Paul King wrote:
 Hi Ronald!
 
My first impression of this paper is that it is yet another
 attempt to reify the doctrine of dialectical materialism, then I
 wondered if the paper was the output of a science-word-salad-izer
 but reading further I saw some gems:
 
 Another implication of the current proposal is that there can be no
 self-aware mecha-
 nized artificial intelligence no matter how advanced the technology
 becomes, since biological
 intelligence is evolved as part of inter-connected universal
 evolution. A mechanical com-
 puter’s CPU will never acquire free will, since it will never be
 able to establish the infinite
 multitude of connections with the rest of the universe environment,
 as manifested in the
 entanglement of the phases of the wave-functions (the Aharonov-Bohm
 effect). However,
 entities formed through semi-biological pathways such as cloning are
 possible because they
 tap into nature’s established pathways to establish these infinite
 connections.
 
As my kids would say: OMG! LOL! /facepalm
 
I would like to agree in principle with Zhang but I am not sure
 that s/he is not a Chinese Room!
 
 Onward!
 
 Stephen
 
 PS, thanks for posting this reference
 
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Everything List group.
 To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
 everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at 
 http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.

-- 


Prof Russell Standish  Phone 0425 253119 (mobile)
Mathematics  
UNSW SYDNEY 2052 hpco...@hpcoders.com.au
Australiahttp://www.hpcoders.com.au


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Everything List group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.



Re: CONSCIOUSNESS AND THE,QUANTUM

2011-03-01 Thread ronaldheld
I see you beat me to posting this.
Ronald

On Mar 1, 12:55 am, Brent Meeker meeke...@dslextreme.com wrote:
 http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/1102/1102.5339v1.pdf

 CONSCIOUSNESS AND THE
 QUANTUM  
 Don N. Page
 Theoretical Physics Institute
 Department of Physics, University of Alberta
 Room 238 CEB, 11322 89 Avenue
 Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2G7
 (2011 Feb. 25)
 Abstract
 Sensible Quantum Mechanics or Mindless Sensationalism is a framework
 for relating consciousness to a quantum universe. It states that each con-
 scious perception has a measure that is given by the expectation value of a
 corresponding quantum awareness operator in a fixed quantum state of the
 universe. The measures can be interpreted as frequency-type probabilities
 for a large set of perceptions that all actually exist with varying
 degrees of
 reality, so detailed theories within this framework are testable. The
 measures
 are not propensities for potentialities to be actualized, so there is
 nothing
 indeterministic in this framework, and no free will in the incompatibilistic
 sense. As conscious perceptions are determined by the awareness operators
 and the quantum state, they are epiphenomena. No fundamental relation is
 postulated between different perceptions (each being the entirety of a
 single
 conscious experience and thus not in direct contact with any other), so
 SQMor
 MS, a variant of Everett s many-worlds framework, is a many-perceptions
 framework but not a many-minds framework.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Everything List group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.



Re: CONSCIOUSNESS AND THE,QUANTUM

2011-03-01 Thread Russell Standish
I look forward to taking a look. I read his previous attempt at this,
about 3 years ago, and it looked like an interesting approach, albeit
embryonic (there were bits that didn't sound right, for instance).

Cheers

On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 04:28:57AM -0800, ronaldheld wrote:
 I see you beat me to posting this.
 Ronald
 
 On Mar 1, 12:55 am, Brent Meeker meeke...@dslextreme.com wrote:
  http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/1102/1102.5339v1.pdf
 
  CONSCIOUSNESS AND THE
  QUANTUM  
  Don N. Page
  Theoretical Physics Institute
  Department of Physics, University of Alberta
  Room 238 CEB, 11322 89 Avenue
  Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2G7
  (2011 Feb. 25)
  Abstract
  Sensible Quantum Mechanics or Mindless Sensationalism is a framework
  for relating consciousness to a quantum universe. It states that each con-
  scious perception has a measure that is given by the expectation value of a
  corresponding quantum awareness operator in a fixed quantum state of the
  universe. The measures can be interpreted as frequency-type probabilities
  for a large set of perceptions that all actually exist with varying
  degrees of
  reality, so detailed theories within this framework are testable. The
  measures
  are not propensities for potentialities to be actualized, so there is
  nothing
  indeterministic in this framework, and no free will in the incompatibilistic
  sense. As conscious perceptions are determined by the awareness operators
  and the quantum state, they are epiphenomena. No fundamental relation is
  postulated between different perceptions (each being the entirety of a
  single
  conscious experience and thus not in direct contact with any other), so
  SQMor
  MS, a variant of Everett s many-worlds framework, is a many-perceptions
  framework but not a many-minds framework.
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Everything List group.
 To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
 everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at 
 http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.

-- 


Prof Russell Standish  Phone 0425 253119 (mobile)
Mathematics  
UNSW SYDNEY 2052 hpco...@hpcoders.com.au
Australiahttp://www.hpcoders.com.au


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Everything List group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.



CONSCIOUSNESS AND THE,QUANTUM

2011-02-28 Thread Brent Meeker

http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/1102/1102.5339v1.pdf

CONSCIOUSNESS AND THE
QUANTUM  
Don N. Page †

Theoretical Physics Institute
Department of Physics, University of Alberta
Room 238 CEB, 11322 – 89 Avenue
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2G7
(2011 Feb. 25)
Abstract
Sensible Quantum Mechanics or Mindless Sensationalism is a framework
for relating consciousness to a quantum universe. It states that each con-
scious perception has a measure that is given by the expectation value of a
corresponding quantum “awareness operator” in a fixed quantum state of the
universe. The measures can be interpreted as frequency-type probabilities
for a large set of perceptions that all actually exist with varying 
degrees of
reality, so detailed theories within this framework are testable. The 
measures
are not propensities for potentialities to be actualized, so there is 
nothing

indeterministic in this framework, and no free will in the incompatibilistic
sense. As conscious perceptions are determined by the awareness operators
and the quantum state, they are epiphenomena. No fundamental relation is
postulated between different perceptions (each being the entirety of a 
single
conscious experience and thus not in direct contact with any other), so 
SQMor

MS, a variant of Everett’s “many-worlds” framework, is a “many-perceptions”
framework but not a “many-minds” framework.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Everything List group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.