...@bezeqint.net
socra...@bezeqint.net wrote:
From 1905 the SRT doesn’t give sleep.
1.
One postulate of SRT takes vacuum as reference frame.
Another postulate of SRT takes inertial reference frame (s).
No, none of the postulates take the vacuum as a reference frame
why a rest frame of the vacuum is needed,
or
whether there could be any way to experimentally test this idea.
Jesse
===.
#
The problem of the exact description of vacuum, in my opinion,
is the basic problem now before physics. Really, if you can’t
correctly
describe the vacuum, how it is
Einstein’s SRT: what is it about?
1.
One of Einstein’s postulate says that particle – quantum of light-
moves in a straight line with constant speed c=1 in the vacuum.
So, in SRT we have one reference frame and it is vacuum.
But because Einstein took time as an constant length
(1 sec=
.
Jesse
===
On Apr 23, 12:03 am, Jesse Mazer laserma...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 10:40 AM, socra...@bezeqint.net
socra...@bezeqint.net wrote:
From 1905 the SRT doesn’t give sleep.
1.
One postulate of SRT takes vacuum as reference frame.
Another postulate
the SRT doesn’t give sleep.
1.
One postulate of SRT takes vacuum as reference frame.
Another postulate of SRT takes inertial reference frame (s).
No, none of the postulates take the vacuum as a reference frame, which
doesn't make sense since a vacuum doesn't have a measurable rest
* - constant.
Socratus
Yes, that's exactly what I said.
Jesse
===
On Apr 23, 12:03 am, Jesse Mazer laserma...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 10:40 AM, socra...@bezeqint.net
socra...@bezeqint.net wrote:
From 1905 the SRT doesn’t give sleep.
1
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 10:40 AM, socra...@bezeqint.net
socra...@bezeqint.net wrote:
From 1905 the SRT doesn’t give sleep.
1.
One postulate of SRT takes vacuum as reference frame.
Another postulate of SRT takes inertial reference frame (s).
No, none of the postulates take the vacuum
the speed of quantum of light in vacuum from
different inertial frames the result will be the *same* - constant.
Socratus
===
On Apr 23, 12:03 am, Jesse Mazer laserma...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 10:40 AM, socra...@bezeqint.net
socra...@bezeqint.net wrote:
From 1905 the SRT
#
If we measure the speed of quantum of light in vacuum from
different inertial frames the result will be the *same* - constant.
Why?
Because all different inertial frames ( stars and planets of billion
s and billions galaxies ) exist in infinite motionless, stationary,
fixed (rest) reference
From 1905 the SRT doesn’t give sleep.
1.
One postulate of SRT takes vacuum as reference frame.
Another postulate of SRT takes inertial reference frame (s).
Can we say what these two (2) reference frames are equal ?
No, they aren’t equal.
Why ?
Because all inertial reference frames are relative
INTRODUCTION
Modified 01-10-11
Hans J. Zweig, With a PhD from Stanford, a masters degree
from Brown and a B.A. from University of Rochester:
#
Newtonian physics is not the ultimate truth about the universe,
but neither is Einstein's Relativity. Newton did not know, or
anticipate,
an upper bound
11 matches
Mail list logo
