On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 8:41 PM, Richard Ruquist wrote:
> Likewise the self-driving cars on earth
Yes.
> and consciousness on the brain.
Maybe :)
>
> On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 9:26 AM, Telmo Menezes
> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Richard Ruquist wrote:
>> > The Mars Rover is cont
Likewise the self-driving cars on earth
and consciousness on the brain.
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 9:26 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Richard Ruquist wrote:
> > The Mars Rover is controlled from Earth.
> > That's hardly a bottom-up control
> > See George Ellis http://ar
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Richard Ruquist wrote:
> The Mars Rover is controlled from Earth.
> That's hardly a bottom-up control
> See George Ellis http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1212/1212.2275.pdf
Hi Richard,
Roger's claim was that "Materialistic science and programming has no
such feat
The Mars Rover is controlled from Earth.
That's hardly a bottom-up control
See George Ellis http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1212/1212.2275.pdf
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 9:13 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 3:05 PM, Roger Clough wrote:
> > A Leibnizian view on why bottom up prog
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 3:05 PM, Roger Clough wrote:
> A Leibnizian view on why bottom up programing cannot work for the brain
>
> 1. In order for the brain to control or govern
> there must be a single governor
Why?
> 2. The single governor must be the single most dominant element in the
> s
A Leibnizian view on why bottom up programing cannot work for the brain
1. In order for the brain to control or govern
there must be a single governor
2. The single governor must be the single most dominant element in the system
and must control downward, not upward
3. Materialistic sc
6 matches
Mail list logo
