Re: Molecular Motion and Heat, was ON THE THEORY OF EVERYTHING was Another TOE short paper

2011-03-11 Thread 1Z
On Mar 10, 8:57 pm, John Mikes jami...@gmail.com wrote: To Evgeniy's train of thought I would attach another question (what you, savants of Q-science may answer easily): if the universe expands (does it, indeed?) do the interstitial spaces in an atom expand similarly, or they are exempt and

Re: Molecular Motion and Heat, was ON THE THEORY OF EVERYTHING was Another TOE short paper

2011-03-11 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
John, I am probably not that far from agnosticism but the question is how to make it useful for practitioners like me who have to earn money. I mean that it is still necessary to take decisions and then the question would be how. Although this could be just illusion somehow made by numbers

Re: Molecular Motion and Heat, was ON THE THEORY OF EVERYTHING was Another TOE short paper

2011-03-10 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
On 10.03.2011 01:29 1Z said the following: On Mar 9, 7:22 pm, Evgenii Rudnyiuse...@rudnyi.ru wrote: When you compare heat and molecular motion, first it would be good to define what molecular motion is. At the beginning, the molecules and atoms were considered as hard spheres. At this

Re: Molecular Motion and Heat, was ON THE THEORY OF EVERYTHING was Another TOE short paper

2011-03-10 Thread John Mikes
Thanks, David, for a reasonable post. I admire Evgeniy for his boldness of a frontal attack against conventional physicality's terms. I would go a step further (is it a surprise?) like: ontology is rather a description of a stagnant knowledge (state? even if dynamic) of *a phase*considered in

Re: Molecular Motion and Heat, was ON THE THEORY OF EVERYTHING was Another TOE short paper

2011-03-09 Thread Evgenii Rudnyi
When you compare heat and molecular motion, first it would be good to define what molecular motion is. At the beginning, the molecules and atoms were considered as hard spheres. At this state, there was the problem as follows. We bring a glass of hot water in the room and leave it there.

Re: Molecular Motion and Heat, was ON THE THEORY OF EVERYTHING was Another TOE short paper

2011-03-09 Thread David Nyman
On 9 March 2011 19:22, Evgenii Rudnyi use...@rudnyi.ru wrote: So I personally not that sure that molecular motion has more meaning *ontologically* than heat. Actually, I agree with you. Of course whatever we can speak or theorise about is, strictly, entirely epistemological and consequently

Re: Molecular Motion and Heat, was ON THE THEORY OF EVERYTHING was Another TOE short paper

2011-03-09 Thread 1Z
On Mar 9, 7:22 pm, Evgenii Rudnyi use...@rudnyi.ru wrote: When you compare heat and molecular motion, first it would be good to define what molecular motion is. At the beginning, the molecules and atoms were considered as hard spheres. At this state, there was the problem as follows. We