Re: Re: Why religious truth is the highest truth

2012-11-05 Thread Roger Clough
Hi Stephen P. King  

Depending on the existence of others is fine but incomplete. 
A flood does not depend on the existence of others,
it's just contingent on too much rain. And not enough time
passed by for the flood to drain down. Come back in a
month and the flood's gone. So time is important,
as well as immediate context.

Note that this follows Kant's definitions of existence:
consisting of two joined factors: time for when an event
occurs, and space (context) for what happens. By
themselves neither one is a substance.

Roger Clough, rclo...@verizon.net 
11/5/2012  
Forever is a long time, especially near the end. -Woody Allen 


- Receiving the following content -  
From: Stephen P. King  
Receiver: everything-list  
Time: 2012-11-04, 12:24:05 
Subject: Re: Why religious truth is the highest truth 


On 11/4/2012 8:10 AM, Roger Clough wrote: 

Hi Stephen P. King  

Necessary truths can't be contingent, because contingent  
truths by definition are contingent on circumstances  
and so may not always be true. Scientific truth, or 
any truth of this world, is such.  


Dear Roger, 

By contingent I mean dependent on the co-existence of others. Existence 
cannot be dependent on anything at all, thus is must be taken in our 
explanations to be ontologically fundamental. 



Pierce taught that consensus or pragmatic truth is  
supreme. What people believe in their hearts,  
what they believe subjectively. What they experience now.  


I love Peirce's cryptic sense of irony. ;--)  



Why is pragmatic truth supreme ? Even higher than 
a necessary truth? 1 + 1 = 2, a statement,  
is a necessary truith, but the higher truth is to  
know that 1 +1 =2, to personally accept and believe that.  
If many agree, that is even better.  


Can we reason outside of our explanations? Can we discuss the content of 
our discussions? Can we escape from the implications of regress? 



If many, such as the Christian church, accept  
a truth such as God created the world, you 
might want to consider it. But it is only true 
if you pragmatically accept it as true. Lutherans 
call that acceptance faith. 


So what about what the Hyperboreans call that acceptance? And what of the 
Ponies or the Mormons or the Blue People? Does it matter who it is? 



There are many forms of truth-- necessary and contingent 
truths, subjective and objective truths, truths by 
correspondence, or through coherency, pragmatic 
truth, eye witness truth, and so forth. In the end, one accepts 
the truth he has the most faith in. So faith 
again rules.  


Of course, because what is faith but the expectation of a future truth? 



Roger Clough, rclo...@verizon.net  
11/4/2012  
Forever is a long time, especially near the end. -Woody Allen  


- Receiving the following content -  
From: Stephen P. King  
Receiver: everything-list  
Time: 2012-11-03, 13:31:14  
Subject: Re: Emergence of Properties  


On 11/3/2012 8:57 AM, Roger Clough wrote:  

The properties of spacetime things are what can be measured (ie facts).  
The properties of beyond spacetime things are propositions that can't be 
contradicted (necessary truths).  

Hi Roger,  

I do not assume that the can't be contradicted is an a priori fixed 
apartheid on truths. I define necessary truths to be contingent on many minds 
in agreement.  





--  
Onward! 

Stephen

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Everything List group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.



Re: Why religious truth is the highest truth

2012-11-05 Thread Stephen P. King

On 11/5/2012 9:00 AM, Roger Clough wrote:

Hi Stephen P. King

Depending on the existence of others is fine but incomplete.
A flood does not depend on the existence of others,
it's just contingent on too much rain.


And the in/ability of the boundary to contain the addition of water...


  And not enough time
passed by for the flood to drain down. Come back in a
month and the flood's gone. So time is important,
as well as immediate context.


Of course!


Note that this follows Kant's definitions of existence:
consisting of two joined factors: time for when an event
occurs, and space (context) for what happens. By
themselves neither one is a substance.


I agree, but these definition ignore plurality and mutual 
exclusivity of points of view.




Roger Clough,rclo...@verizon.net  
11/5/2012

Forever is a long time, especially near the end. -Woody Allen



--
Onward!

Stephen


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Everything List group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.



Why religious truth is the highest truth

2012-11-04 Thread Roger Clough
Hi Stephen P. King 

Necessary truths can't be contingent, because contingent 
truths by definition are contingent on circumstances 
and so may not always be true. Scientific truth, or
any truth of this world, is such. 

Pierce taught that consensus or pragmatic truth is 
supreme. What people believe in their hearts, 
what they believe subjectively. What they experience now. 

Why is pragmatic truth supreme ? Even higher than
a necessary truth? 1 + 1 = 2, a statement, 
is a necessary truith, but the higher truth is to 
know that 1 +1 =2, to personally accept and believe that. 
If many agree, that is even better. 

If many, such as the Christian church, accept 
a truth such as God created the world, you
might want to consider it. But it is only true
if you pragmatically accept it as true. Lutherans
call that acceptance faith.

There are many forms of truth-- necessary and contingent
truths, subjective and objective truths, truths by
correspondence, or through coherency, pragmatic
truth, eye witness truth, and so forth. In the end, one accepts
the truth he has the most faith in. So faith
again rules. 

Roger Clough, rclo...@verizon.net 
11/4/2012 
Forever is a long time, especially near the end. -Woody Allen 


- Receiving the following content - 
From: Stephen P. King 
Receiver: everything-list 
Time: 2012-11-03, 13:31:14 
Subject: Re: Emergence of Properties 


On 11/3/2012 8:57 AM, Roger Clough wrote: 

The properties of spacetime things are what can be measured (ie facts). 
The properties of beyond spacetime things are propositions that can't be 
contradicted (necessary truths). 

Hi Roger, 

I do not assume that the can't be contradicted is an a priori fixed 
apartheid on truths. I define necessary truths to be contingent on many minds 
in agreement. 


-- 
Onward! 

Stephen

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Everything List group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.



Re: Why religious truth is the highest truth

2012-11-04 Thread Stephen P. King

On 11/4/2012 8:10 AM, Roger Clough wrote:

Hi Stephen P. King

Necessary truths can't be contingent, because contingent
truths by definition are contingent on circumstances
and so may not always be true. Scientific truth, or
any truth of this world, is such.


Dear Roger,

By contingent I mean dependent on the co-existence of others. 
Existence cannot be dependent on anything at all, thus is must be taken 
in our explanations to be ontologically fundamental.




Pierce taught that consensus or pragmatic truth is
supreme. What people believe in their hearts,
what they believe subjectively. What they experience now.


I love Peirce's cryptic sense of irony. ;--)



Why is pragmatic truth supreme ? Even higher than
a necessary truth? 1 + 1 = 2, a statement,
is a necessary truith, but the higher truth is to
know that 1 +1 =2, to personally accept and believe that.
If many agree, that is even better.


Can we reason outside of our explanations? Can we discuss the 
content of our discussions? Can we escape from the implications of regress?




If many, such as the Christian church, accept
a truth such as God created the world, you
might want to consider it. But it is only true
if you pragmatically accept it as true. Lutherans
call that acceptance faith.


So what about what the Hyperboreans call that acceptance? And what 
of the Ponies or the Mormons or the Blue People? Does it matter who it is?




There are many forms of truth-- necessary and contingent
truths, subjective and objective truths, truths by
correspondence, or through coherency, pragmatic
truth, eye witness truth, and so forth. In the end, one accepts
the truth he has the most faith in. So faith
again rules.


Of course, because what is faith but the expectation of a future truth?



Roger Clough, rclo...@verizon.net mailto:%20rclo...@verizon.net
11/4/2012
Forever is a long time, especially near the end. -Woody Allen


- Receiving the following content -
From: Stephen P. King
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2012-11-03, 13:31:14
Subject: Re: Emergence of Properties


On 11/3/2012 8:57 AM, Roger Clough wrote:

The properties of spacetime things are what can be measured (ie facts).
The properties of beyond spacetime things are propositions that can't 
be contradicted (necessary truths).


Hi Roger,

I do not assume that the can't be contradicted is an a priori 
fixed apartheid on truths. I define necessary truths to be contingent 
on many minds in agreement.





--
Onward!

Stephen

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Everything List group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.



Re: Why religious truth is the highest truth

2012-11-04 Thread John Clark
Rodger, why do you believe that religious truth is truth at all, much
less the highest truth? It's because most small children are genetically
hard wired to unquestionably believe most of what adults tell them and to
carry that belief until the day they die; that's why religious belief has a
very very strong geographical pattern. Infants in the Americas were told
Christian Bullshit before they were able to reason properly and so they
believed it, and when they become adults they taught the same Bullshit to
their children; Middle Eastern infants were taught Islamic Bullshit and
Indian children were taught Hindu Bullshit. And this self reinforcing cycle
of idiocy that has cursed the Human Race for so many centuries causes most
people in the Americas to believe in Christianity mythology, most in the
Middle East to to believe in Islamic mythology and most in India to believe
in Hindu mythology.

  John K Clark




 Hi Stephen P. King

 Necessary truths can't be contingent, because contingent
 truths by definition are contingent on circumstances
 and so may not always be true. Scientific truth, or
 any truth of this world, is such.

 Pierce taught that consensus or pragmatic truth is
 supreme. What people believe in their hearts,
 what they believe subjectively. What they experience now.

 Why is pragmatic truth supreme ? Even higher than
 a necessary truth? 1 + 1 = 2, a statement,
 is a necessary truith, but the higher truth is to
 know that 1 +1 =2, to personally accept and believe that.
 If many agree, that is even better.

 If many, such as the Christian church, accept
 a truth such as God created the world, you
 might want to consider it. But it is only true
 if you pragmatically accept it as true. Lutherans
 call that acceptance faith.

 There are many forms of truth-- necessary and contingent
 truths, subjective and objective truths, truths by
 correspondence, or through coherency, pragmatic
 truth, eye witness truth, and so forth. In the end, one accepts
 the truth he has the most faith in. So faith
 again rules.

 Roger Clough, rclo...@verizon.net +rclo...@verizon.net
 11/4/2012
 Forever is a long time, especially near the end. -Woody Allen


 - Receiving the following content -
 From: Stephen P. King
 Receiver: everything-list
 Time: 2012-11-03, 13:31:14
 Subject: Re: Emergence of Properties


 On 11/3/2012 8:57 AM, Roger Clough wrote:

 The properties of spacetime things are what can be measured (ie facts).
 The properties of beyond spacetime things are propositions that can't be
 contradicted (necessary truths).

 Hi Roger,

 I do not assume that the can't be contradicted is an a priori fixed
 apartheid on truths. I define necessary truths to be contingent on many
 minds in agreement.


 --
 Onward!

 Stephen

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Everything List group.
 To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Everything List group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.