Re: conversation with GPT-4 on black hole QM

2023-05-13 Thread Lawrence Crowell
To continue, I have input about half the paragraphs of a paper draft I am writing. It found a small error I made. It also made a couple of remarkable extrapolations of this work. Since I have been doing this the last couple of weeks I have generated a lot of text. GPT-4 is capable of

Re: conversation with GPT-4 on black hole QM

2023-05-12 Thread John Clark
On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 6:33 PM Lawrence Crowell < goldenfieldquaterni...@gmail.com> wrote: > I* have found 2 mistakes it* [GPT-4] *has made. It has caught me on a few > errors as well.* > To me that sounds like very impressive performance. If you were working with a human colleague who did the

Re: conversation with GPT-4 on black hole QM

2023-05-11 Thread Lawrence Crowell
I have found 2 mistakes it has made. It has caught me on a few errors as well. GPT-4 has a vast database it can access. It clearly can reference a fair number of theories, papers and authors. It is a very good emulator of intelligence. It also is proving to be a decent first check on my work.

Re: conversation with GPT-4 on black hole QM

2023-05-09 Thread John Clark
On Mon, May 8, 2023 at 8:10 PM Lawrence Crowell < goldenfieldquaterni...@gmail.com> wrote: > I spent some time on GPT-4 this afternoon. I wrote about a topic that was > leading to an inference I had made. Before I wrote on that inference GPT > made the same inference. Wow! Would I be correct in

Re: conversation with GPT-4 on black hole QM

2023-05-08 Thread Lawrence Crowell
I spent some time on GPT-4 this afternoon. I wrote about a topic that was leading to an inference I had made. Before I wrote on that inference GPT made the same inference. LC -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe

Re: conversation with GPT-4 on black hole QM

2023-05-08 Thread Lawrence Crowell
gt; sure, you animal-lovers! So, I am loathe to do do anything that slows us > down!! But I had to ask! > > > -Original Message- > From: Lawrence Crowell > To: Everything List > Sent: Sun, May 7, 2023 7:10 pm > Subject: Re: conversation with GPT-4 on black hole QM > > On S

Re: conversation with GPT-4 on black hole QM

2023-05-07 Thread spudboy100 via Everything List
had to ask! -Original Message- From: Lawrence Crowell To: Everything List Sent: Sun, May 7, 2023 7:10 pm Subject: Re: conversation with GPT-4 on black hole QM On Saturday, May 6, 2023 at 6:21:50 AM UTC-5 John Clark wrote: On Fri, May 5, 2023 at 8:03 PM Lawrence Crowell wrote: > I had this

Re: conversation with GPT-4 on black hole QM

2023-05-07 Thread Lawrence Crowell
On Saturday, May 6, 2023 at 6:21:50 AM UTC-5 John Clark wrote: On Fri, May 5, 2023 at 8:03 PM Lawrence Crowell wrote: *> I had this conservation with GPT-4 on aspects of black hole quantum mechanics. I kept it largely non-mathematical. This is interesting, and it suggests a level of

Re: conversation with GPT-4 on black hole QM

2023-05-06 Thread John Clark
On Fri, May 5, 2023 at 8:03 PM Lawrence Crowell < goldenfieldquaterni...@gmail.com> wrote: *> I had this conservation with GPT-4 on aspects of black hole quantum > mechanics. I kept it largely non-mathematical. This is interesting, and it > suggests a level of processing that is complex. An AI

conversation with GPT-4 on black hole QM

2023-05-05 Thread Lawrence Crowell
I had this conservation with GPT-4 on aspects of black hole quantum mechanics. I kept it largely non-mathematical. This is interesting, and it suggests a level of processing that is complex. An AI system was fed ephemeris data on the appearance of the sun, moon and planets in the sky and it