[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OO O O
Othen lim i-inf e(i) = inf.
O
O This will not give you a uniform
O distribution on infinitely many things.
O O
O O yes. i agree.
O O
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 31 18:14:55 2001
From: Karl Stiefvater [EMAIL PROTECTED]
O
O Maybe you'd like to write down formally
OO what you mean.
O O
O O sure. i suspect we're talking past each other.
O O
oops. my last message didn't make it to the
full list.
O
O Maybe you'd like to write down formally
OO what you mean.
O O
O O sure. i suspect we're talking past each other.
O O ??? - There is no way of assigning equal
OO O O O nonvanishing probability to infinitely
O O O O many mathematical structures, each being
O O O represented by a finite set of axioms.
OO O O O
O okay - strictly
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Even if He completely ignores runtime, He still cannot assign high
probability to irregular universes with long minimal descriptions.
Lee Smolin wrote about some Darwinian super-selection rule, among
trees of universes. Do you think there is a possible connection?
He
From: Karl Stiefvater [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 28 May 2001 00:11:33 -0500
O OO OO Max Tegmark suggests that .. all mathematical
O O structures are a priori given equal statistical
OOOO O weight and Jurgen Schmidhuber counters that
O O OOO there
6 matches
Mail list logo
