Yes. But building a neutrino shield would be difficult.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 4:43 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: everything-list@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: ROSS MODEL OF THE UNIVERSE - The Simplest Yet Theory of
Howdy!
I friend of mine has worked on a related idea that might help this
inverstigation. Please see:
http://davidwoolsey.com/physics/ideas/neutrinoscope/index.html
Kindest regards,
Stephen
- Original Message -
From: "John Ross" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Thanks for the paper relating to detection of "low energy" neutrinos.
However, according to my model, neutrinos are very, very high energy
photons (off everybody's chart, except mine).
Therefore, if my model is correct, then low energy neutrinos would
merely be the photons we are familiar with and
This means that beta decay proves your model wrong.
- Original Message -
From: "John Ross" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Stephen Paul King'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Saturday, October 08, 2005 12:35 AM
Subject: RE: Neutrino shield idea
> Thanks for the paper relating to detection of "low
Neutrinos are fermions with spin 1/2. Photons are bosons with spin
0. This is about as chalk and cheese as you can get. The difference is
not energy.
Cheers
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 03:35:03PM -0700, John Ross wrote:
> Thanks for the paper relating to detection of "low energy" neutrinos.
> However
Dear Russell,
I hope you meant to write that photons are bosons with spin1. Otherwise
we would have a hard time explaining Maxwell's Field equations. ;-) About
the differences between neutrinos and photons, we could also point out that
photons have a null extension in the time direction and
Hi Russell and Friends,
I just ran across the following post and
thought that you might find it interesting. Any comments?
Onward!
Stephen
On Thu, 11 Aug 2005 10:32:00 + (UTC), in
sci.physics.research [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The "Minkowski" or "inertial" vacuum state seen
John Ross wrote:
Thanks for the paper relating to detection of "low energy" neutrinos.
However, according to my model, neutrinos are very, very high energy
photons (off everybody's chart, except mine).
Therefore, if my model is correct, then low energy neutrinos would
merely be the photons we
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 09:02:17PM -0400, Stephen Paul King wrote:
> Dear Russell,
>
>I hope you meant to write that photons are bosons with spin1. Otherwise
Yes, you are right. Mea culpa! Put it down to the couple of decades
since I studied this stuff...
> we would have a hard time explain
Hello, list. I occasionally posted here, years ago; lately I've
lurked. Russell, your book is high on my 'to read' list!
On Oct 7, 2005, at 6:04 PM, Stephen Paul King wrote:
Hi Russell and Friends,
I just ran across the following post and thought that you might
find it interesting. A
10 matches
Mail list logo
