peterdjones wrote:
[...]
(To put it another way: the point is to explain
experience. Physicalism explains non-experience
of HP universes by saying they don't exist. MM appeals
to ad-hoc hypotheses about non-interaction. All explanations
have to end somewhere. The question is how many
Georges Quénot wrote:
peterdjones wrote:
[...]
(To put it another way: the point is to explain
experience. Physicalism explains non-experience
of HP universes by saying they don't exist. MM appeals
to ad-hoc hypotheses about non-interaction. All explanations
have to end somewhere.
peterdjones wrote:
Georges Quénot wrote:
peterdjones wrote:
[...]
(To put it another way: the point is to explain
experience. Physicalism explains non-experience
of HP universes by saying they don't exist. MM appeals
to ad-hoc hypotheses about non-interaction. All explanations
have to
Johnathan Corgan wrote:
Still, there is a certain appeal to shifting the question from Why are
we conscious? to Consciousness doesn't exist, so why do we so firmly
believe that it does?
It is possible to imagine a machine that doubts (or perhaps I should say
doubts, i.e. we should not assume
Georges Quénot wrote:
peterdjones wrote:
Georges Quénot wrote:
peterdjones wrote:
[...]
(To put it another way: the point is to explain
experience. Physicalism explains non-experience
of HP universes by saying they don't exist. MM appeals
to ad-hoc hypotheses about
Hal Finney wrote:
Johnathan Corgan wrote:
Still, there is a certain appeal to shifting the question from Why are
we conscious? to Consciousness doesn't exist, so why do we so firmly
believe that it does?
It is possible to imagine a machine that doubts (or perhaps I should say
doubts,
Bruno Marchal wrote:
<>
Le 25-mars-06, 00:51, George Levy a crit :
Smullyan's white knigth had the mission to teach me about the logic of
G
and G*. Sorry, he failed.
All right, but this is just because he miss Church Thesis and Comp. His
purpose actually is just to introduce you to
1Z wrote:
Georges Quénot wrote:
peterdjones wrote:
Georges Quénot wrote:
peterdjones wrote:
[...]
(To put it another way: the point is to explain
experience. Physicalism explains non-experience
of HP universes by saying they don't exist. MM appeals
to ad-hoc hypotheses about
8 matches
Mail list logo