Stathis,
If you answer better your own question than me, I will lose my job
here :-)
You put your finger on the very reason why "primary matter" is
incompatible with computationalism.
Concreteness can make histories singular only by adding actual
infinities into it. Then from inside we have t
Le 29-janv.-07, à 21:33, 1Z a écrit :
>
>
>
> On 24 Jan, 11:42, Bruno Marchal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Le 23-janv.-07, à 15:59, 1Z a écrit :
>>
>>
>>
>>> Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>
Also, nobody has proved the existence of a primitive physical
universe.
>>
>>> Or of a PlatoniaCall it
Le 29-janv.-07, à 18:19, Brent Meeker a écrit :
>
> Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>
>> Le 28-janv.-07, à 20:21, Brent Meeker a écrit :
>>
>>
>>
>>> OK, but that means "observer moments" are not fundamental and the
>>> "illusion" of their continuity may be provided by the continuity of
>>> their underpin
Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
> Le 29-janv.-07, à 18:19, Brent Meeker a écrit :
>
>> Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>> Le 28-janv.-07, à 20:21, Brent Meeker a écrit :
>>>
>>>
>>>
OK, but that means "observer moments" are not fundamental and the
"illusion" of their continuity may be provided by the con
Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
> Le 29-janv.-07, à 21:33, 1Z a écrit :
>
>>
>>
>> On 24 Jan, 11:42, Bruno Marchal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Le 23-janv.-07, à 15:59, 1Z a écrit :
>>>
>>>
>>>
Bruno Marchal wrote:
> Also, nobody has proved the existence of a primitive physical
> universe.
On Thursday 01 February 2007 19:28:07 Brent Meeker wrote:
> Bruno Marchal wrote:
> > Le 29-janv.-07, à 21:33, 1Z a écrit :
> >> On 24 Jan, 11:42, Bruno Marchal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> Le 23-janv.-07, à 15:59, 1Z a écrit :
> Bruno Marchal wrote:
> > Also, nobody has proved the exi
Brent Meeker wrote:
> Bruno Marchal wrote:
> > Where is the universe?
>
> Here.
>
And here (in this machine) too, of course.
I thought I would just pop in and also say that I very much appreciated
your recent post, Brent, where you made some very good points including
the one about amoebas ha
Quentin Anciaux wrote:
> On Thursday 01 February 2007 19:28:07 Brent Meeker wrote:
>> Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>> Le 29-janv.-07, à 21:33, 1Z a écrit :
On 24 Jan, 11:42, Bruno Marchal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Le 23-janv.-07, à 15:59, 1Z a écrit :
>> Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>> Also,
On Thursday 01 February 2007 19:34:41 Brent Meeker wrote:
> Quentin Anciaux wrote:
> > On Thursday 01 February 2007 19:28:07 Brent Meeker wrote:
> >> Bruno Marchal wrote:
> >>> Le 29-janv.-07, à 21:33, 1Z a écrit :
> On 24 Jan, 11:42, Bruno Marchal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Le 23-jan
Quentin Anciaux wrote:
> On Thursday 01 February 2007 19:34:41 Brent Meeker wrote:
>> Quentin Anciaux wrote:
>>> On Thursday 01 February 2007 19:28:07 Brent Meeker wrote:
Bruno Marchal wrote:
> Le 29-janv.-07, à 21:33, 1Z a écrit :
>> On 24 Jan, 11:42, Bruno Marchal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thursday 01 February 2007 19:34:41 Brent Meeker wrote:
> Quentin Anciaux wrote:
> > On Thursday 01 February 2007 19:28:07 Brent Meeker wrote:
> >> Bruno Marchal wrote:
> >>> Le 29-janv.-07, à 21:33, 1Z a écrit :
> On 24 Jan, 11:42, Bruno Marchal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Le 23-jan
On Feb 1, 11:46 am, Brent Meeker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
> > Le 29-janv.-07, à 18:19, Brent Meeker a écrit :
>
> >> Bruno Marchal wrote:
> >>> Le 28-janv.-07, à 20:21, Brent Meeker a écrit :
>
> OK, but that means "observer moments" are not fundamental and the
> >>
Brent Meeker writes:
> Bruno Marchal wrote:
> >
> > Le 29-janv.-07, à 18:19, Brent Meeker a écrit :
> >
> >> Bruno Marchal wrote:
> >>> Le 28-janv.-07, à 20:21, Brent Meeker a écrit :
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> OK, but that means "observer moments" are not fundamental and the
> "illusion" o
13 matches
Mail list logo