Re: Machines was:Kim 2.1

2008-12-30 Thread Kim Jones
On 28/12/2008, at 12:14 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: > With > Everett everything becomes clearer: nature does not collapse the wave, > and thus, does not provide any examples of a machine generating truly > random events. Randomness appears in the mind of the multiplied > observers, exactly like in

Re: Quantum Immortality - the principle of the least improbability/influencing things

2008-12-30 Thread Stathis Papaioannou
2008/12/30 kla...@bkpsecurity.com : > Lets assume, that Alice who believes in QI wants a certain probable > event to happen, for instance win 1,000,000 in a casino. Alice then > comes to a casino with a loaded gun and promises to herself, that she > will kill herself if she does not win 1,000,000

Re: KIM 2.2 and 2.3

2008-12-30 Thread Bruno Marchal
On 30 Dec 2008, at 02:22, Kim Jones wrote: > > > "I am good to go!" I suspect this is not english :) > > > > Have teleported it to my screen... You should print it and put it in your kitchen or toilet, and put a big red cross on each step you understand well, so that your partner can

Re: KIM 2.2 and 2.3

2008-12-30 Thread Kim Jones
On 31/12/2008, at 5:08 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: > > On 30 Dec 2008, at 02:22, Kim Jones wrote: > > >> >> >> "I am good to go!" > > > I suspect this is not english :) It isn't. It's American ;-) (ducks quickly, like George Bush the other day and the shoes) Military talk - if you have seen th