Le 26-janv.-10, à 22:29, Jack Mallah a écrit :
--- On Tue, 1/26/10, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 25 Jan 2010, at 23:16, Jack Mallah wrote:
Killing one man is not OK just because he has a brother.
In our context, the 'brother' has the same consciousness.
The "brother" most certainly does not h
Le 27-janv.-10, à 01:39, Mark Buda a écrit :
Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 25 Jan 2010, at 23:15, Mark Buda wrote:
On 25 Jan 2010, at 04:39, Mark Buda wrote:
Bruno Marchal wrote:
I would suggest the SANE 2004 paper:
http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/publications/SANE2004MARCHAL.htm
Are you OK w
2010/1/27 Jack Mallah :
> See above. That would be a measure-conserving process, so it would be OK.
I would be upset at the prospect of someone killing me even if they
filled the world with angelic beings by way of atonement, because it
would not feel as if any of them were me. On the other hand,
Bruno Marchal wrote:
> Le 27-janv.-10, à 01:39, Mark Buda a écrit :
>> Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>> On 25 Jan 2010, at 23:15, Mark Buda wrote:
> On 25 Jan 2010, at 04:39, Mark Buda wrote:
>> Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>> I would suggest the SANE 2004 paper:
>>>
>>> http://iridia.ulb.ac.b
Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
2010/1/27 Jack Mallah :
See above. That would be a measure-conserving process, so it would be OK.
I would be upset at the prospect of someone killing me even if they
filled the world with angelic beings by way of atonement, because it
would not feel as if an
Mark Buda wrote:
Bruno Marchal wrote:
Le 27-janv.-10, à 01:39, Mark Buda a écrit :
Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 25 Jan 2010, at 23:15, Mark Buda wrote:
On 25 Jan 2010, at 04:39, Mark Buda wrote:
Bruno Marchal wrote:
I would suggest the SANE 200
I'm replying to this bit seperately since Bruno touched on a different issue
than the others have. My reply to the main "measure again '10" thread will
follow under the original title.
--- On Wed, 1/27/10, Bruno Marchal wrote:
> I would also not say yes to a computationalist doctor, because my
On 28 January 2010 05:31, Brent Meeker wrote:
> If I understand you correctly, your discussion of "copies" really refers to
> copies that exist in different identical worlds, e.g. like different copies
> of the same AI running in identical virtual environments, so that they can
> run "in lockstep
Jack,
What you mentioned ending the existence of a suffering copy can be positive.
I am curious, would you consider ending any observer whose quality of life
was less than the average weighted (by number of copies) quality of life of
all observers everywhere? Consider this example:
http://en.wik
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 7:46 PM, Jack Mallah wrote:
> I'm replying to this bit seperately since Bruno touched on a different
> issue than the others have. My reply to the main "measure again '10" thread
> will follow under the original title.
>
> --- On Wed, 1/27/10, Bruno Marchal wrote:
> > I
Hey There,
I love reading the posts on this group, and I find a lot of the ideas
mindblowing (and more than occasionally over my head) but I was
wondering if anyone could clarify this question(s):
1) Is QI implied by UDA and comp?
2) Is QI implied by ASSA/RSSA?
More generally, what is the existe
11 matches
Mail list logo