On 28 Feb 2010, at 18:43, David Nyman wrote:
On 28 February 2010 15:45, Bruno Marchal wrote:
UDA shows that the wave equation (not just the collapse) has to
emerge from
a relative state measure on all computational histories.
The schroedinger equation has to be itself the result of the
a
On 01 Mar 2010, at 05:40, Rex Allen wrote:
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 10:59 AM, Bruno Marchal
wrote:
On 28 Feb 2010, at 07:33, Rex Allen wrote:
What would the causal mechanism for natural selection be? A
"selection field"? "Selection particles"? Spooky "selection at a
distance"???
No
On 1 March 2010 08:26, Bruno Marchal wrote:
> Everett uses comp, in the usual intuitive way, because he characterizes the
> observer by its crisp memory, and he derives the phenomenology of the wave
> packet reduction, by showing it to appears through "physical interaction" in
> the memory/diary
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 4:07 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
> On 01 Mar 2010, at 05:40, Rex Allen wrote:
>> At most (!) one of those levels is
>> what really exists - the other levels are just ways that we think
>> about what really exists or ways that things *seem* to us.
>
> The point is that such a s
On Feb 26, 10:34 am, Brent Meeker wrote:
>
> But isn't the EPR experiment a way of avoiding a past constraint. The
> past constraint is just that the net angular momentum is zero, so there
> is no constraint on the polarization of either photon. When one is
> measured it can be thought of as sen
5 matches
Mail list logo
