Re: bruno list

2011-07-28 Thread Bruno Marchal
On 27 Jul 2011, at 20:48, Craig Weinberg wrote: On Jul 26, 4:48 pm, Bruno Marchal wrote: All known biology is Turing emulable. The carbon atom is Turing emulable. Since our biology is the only biology that we can know from the inside, why would we assume that what we can emulate the interi

Re: bruno list

2011-07-28 Thread Craig Weinberg
On Jul 28, 12:02 am, Jason Resch wrote: > Say we made a youtube program that could be interviewed for years by your > friends and family, people on this list, and so forth, and it could generate > responses similar enough to what you would do and say in the same > circumstance that no one could t

Re: bruno list

2011-07-28 Thread Stathis Papaioannou
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 5:04 AM, Craig Weinberg wrote: > On Jul 27, 7:37 am, Stathis Papaioannou wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 11:29 PM, Craig Weinberg >> wrote: > >> But you must believe that your vision is normal, because the parts of >> your brain responsible for formulating beliefs and

Re: bruno list

2011-07-28 Thread Jason Resch
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 8:31 AM, Craig Weinberg wrote: > On Jul 28, 12:02 am, Jason Resch wrote: > > > Say we made a youtube program that could be interviewed for years by your > > friends and family, people on this list, and so forth, and it could > generate > > responses similar enough to what

Re: bruno list

2011-07-28 Thread Craig Weinberg
On Jul 28, 4:29 am, Bruno Marchal wrote: > We do have abandoned vitalism in biology, and we don't have any reason > to assume there is anything special in biology which would prevent > other materials to have any similar role. We can assume that the heart > is a biological pump, and nobody doubt

Re: bruno list

2011-07-28 Thread Jason Resch
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:41 AM, Craig Weinberg wrote: > On Jul 28, 4:29 am, Bruno Marchal wrote: > > > We have made the big discovery of the universal digital machine, and > > we do have good reason to find highly plausible that a brain is a > > biological universal machine. > > I agree, but th

Re: bruno list

2011-07-28 Thread Stephen P. King
On 7/28/2011 12:27 PM, Jason Resch wrote: On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:41 AM, Craig Weinberg mailto:whatsons...@gmail.com>> wrote: On Jul 28, 4:29 am, Bruno Marchal mailto:marc...@ulb.ac.be>> wrote: > We have made the big discovery of the universal digital machine, and > we do hav

Re: bruno list

2011-07-28 Thread Craig Weinberg
On Jul 28, 11:23 am, Jason Resch wrote: > On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 8:31 AM, Craig Weinberg wrote: > > No, not at all. It's like saying that a copy machine would have to > > understand Chinese to be able to copy all of the pages in all of the > > books of a library in China. > > No it would not. C

Re: bruno list

2011-07-28 Thread Jason Resch
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Stephen P. King wrote: > On 7/28/2011 12:27 PM, Jason Resch wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:41 AM, Craig Weinberg wrote: > >> On Jul 28, 4:29 am, Bruno Marchal wrote: >> >> > We have made the big discovery of the universal digital machine, and >> > we d

Re: bruno list

2011-07-28 Thread Craig Weinberg
On Jul 28, 12:27 pm, Jason Resch wrote: > Materials don't have experiences, minds have experiences.   Minds are the experiences of neurological material. They aren't freefloating mentalness. I think you have > taken reductionism to an extreme, and are trying to explain perceptions and > thought

Re: bruno list

2011-07-28 Thread Craig Weinberg
On Jul 28, 3:53 pm, Jason Resch wrote: >One of Craig's main ideas is that things made of carbon can feel certain >ways Mais non! Being made of carbon isn't important in theory, it's having the experience of a living organism with a nervous system that dictates whether it can feel certain ways. If

Re: bruno list

2011-07-28 Thread Stephen P. King
Hi Jason, Might I point out that making copies only applies when one has a different position in space to put the copy, which presupposes space. What if you don't have any space? Onward! Stephen On 7/28/2011 3:44 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote: On Jul 28, 11:23 am, Jason Resch wrote: On Th

Re: bruno list

2011-07-28 Thread Jason Resch
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote: > On Jul 28, 12:27 pm, Jason Resch wrote: > > > Materials don't have experiences, minds have experiences. > > Minds are the experiences of neurological material. They aren't > freefloating mentalness. > > I think you have > > taken reductioni

Re: bruno list

2011-07-28 Thread Jason Resch
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote: > On Jul 28, 3:53 pm, Jason Resch wrote: > >One of Craig's main ideas is that things made of carbon can feel certain > >ways > > Mais non! Being made of carbon isn't important in theory, it's having > the experience of a living organism with

Re: bruno list

2011-07-28 Thread Craig Weinberg
On Jul 28, 10:55 pm, Jason Resch wrote: > On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote: > > It's only you who is aware that they are questions. Your copy machine > > is no different from any copy machine except that it generates a > > recording of a different page than the one fed into i

Re: bruno list

2011-07-28 Thread Craig Weinberg
On Jul 28, 11:16 pm, Jason Resch wrote: > On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote: > > We are the living example of how material is important to perceptions. > > A few hundred micrograms of LSD proves that that is the case. > > Are you suggesting that the LSD itself is what is havin

Re: bruno list

2011-07-28 Thread Craig Weinberg
On Jul 28, 11:23 pm, Jason Resch wrote: > What differences does the history of a life have to do with what you are > experiencing now?  If aliens created a human being from scratch just like > you, and swapped you out while you were asleep, why would this physically > identical copy of you behav