On Oct 25, 7:00 pm, Nick Prince nickmag.pri...@googlemail.com wrote:
QTI, Cul de sacs and differentiation
By the end of the first evolution due to Msg, the infinite
bundle of universes has partitioned into two bundles i.e. one bundle
of universes that have a Z spin up electron moving upwards
On 25 Oct 2011, at 22:40, Russell Standish wrote:
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 04:08:38PM +0200, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 23 Oct 2011, at 04:41, Russell Standish wrote:
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 02:14:48PM +0200, Bruno Marchal wrote:
So the histories, we're agreed, are uncountable in number, but
[NP]
QTI, Cul de sacs and differentiation
By the end of the first evolution due to Msg, the infinite
bundle of universes has partitioned into two bundles i.e. one bundle
of universes that have a Z spin up electron moving upwards with a
neutral detector reading and an alive cat, and another bundle
On 26 Oct 2011, at 05:34, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 10/25/2011 4:40 PM, Russell Standish wrote:
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 04:08:38PM +0200, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 23 Oct 2011, at 04:41, Russell Standish wrote:
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 02:14:48PM +0200, Bruno Marchal wrote:
So the histories,
Craig: a redface reply
I made it in reverse, when I wrote (and your answer was correct TO THAT):
* *(JM: I like such distinction. Problem is: I see only how to
realizethe OBJECTIVE existence? we can THINK about it.
* *
*CW: It may be problematic to put subjectivity in objective
compscicrackpot wrote:
Consciousness is the heuristic of the universal search algorithm.
To say that nature is the blind watchmaker is to forget that
watchmakers are nature too, evolution has feelings, technological
evolution is the conscious phase of evolution which is in acceleration
Dear Colin,
I hope the Singularity Conference was a singular success and by now the
material is - sort of - sorted. Is there a URL where I can get the main
points to? (you may know that I push 90 -am semi paraplegic and a heart
patient, no chance to travel.
IMO singularity (as I learned in the
On Oct 26, 3:14 pm, John Mikes jami...@gmail.com wrote:
Craig: a redface reply
I made it in reverse, when I wrote (and your answer was correct TO THAT):
I DO *NOT* see, how to realize OBJECTIVE existence, because all we can
perceive is
our subjective absorption, even that adjusted for
On Oct 26, 11:29 am, Nick Prince nickmag.pri...@googlemail.com
wrote:
[NP]
QTI, Cul de sacs and differentiation
By the end of the first evolution due to Msg, the infinite
bundle of universes has partitioned into two bundles i.e. one bundle
of universes that have a Z spin up electron moving
On 10/26/2011 12:44 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 26 Oct 2011, at 05:34, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 10/25/2011 4:40 PM, Russell Standish wrote:
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 04:08:38PM +0200, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 23 Oct 2011, at 04:41, Russell Standish wrote:
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 02:14:48PM
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 6:00 PM, Nick Prince
nickmag.pri...@googlemail.comwrote:
QTI, Cul de sacs and differentiation
I’m trying to get a picture of how David Deutsch’s idea of
differentiation works – especially in relation to QTI. With a
standard treatment it looks as if there might be
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 04:00:56PM -0700, Nick Prince wrote:
QTI, Cul de sacs and differentiation
I’m trying to get a picture of how David Deutsch’s idea of
differentiation works – especially in relation to QTI. With a
standard treatment it looks as if there might be cul de sacs for a
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 06:58:15PM -0500, Jason Resch wrote:
Nick,
I think such cul de sacs exist only from third person perspectives. E.g.,
the experimenter's view of what happens to the cat. When considering the
perspective from the first person (cat) perspective, there are no cul de
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 7:14 PM, Russell Standish li...@hpcoders.com.auwrote:
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 06:58:15PM -0500, Jason Resch wrote:
Nick,
I think such cul de sacs exist only from third person perspectives.
E.g.,
the experimenter's view of what happens to the cat. When
On 10/26/2011 5:10 PM, Russell Standish wrote:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 04:00:56PM -0700, Nick Prince wrote:
QTI, Cul de sacs and differentiation
I’m trying to get a picture of how David Deutsch’s idea of
differentiation works – especially in relation to QTI. With a
standard treatment it
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 08:02:02PM -0500, Jason Resch wrote:
I don't think it is possible to define personal discontinuation (death) in
terms of a local event or configuration that is setup in some corner of a
universe.
For instance, if the universe is infinitely big, one could recur
16 matches
Mail list logo
