On 3/29/2012 10:23 PM, Stephen P. King wrote:
Take my favorite thought experiment. Suppose I design two Mars Rovers and I want them
to coordinate their movements in order to round up Martian sheep. I can easily
distribute the artificial intelligence between the two of them, using data links
On 29 Mar 2012, at 21:47, meekerdb wrote:
On 3/29/2012 12:02 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 29 Mar 2012, at 20:08, meekerdb wrote:
On 3/29/2012 10:14 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
And YOU HAVE BEEN DUPLICATED.
I will ask you to do the hairsplitting about that YOU, that
you are using here, so
David,
Selection was even earlier proposed by Leibniz in his Monadology philosophy
along with many other principles about half of which have been confirmed by
scientific theory and experimentation.
http://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/philosophy/works/ge/leibniz.htm
Richard David Ruquist
On
On 3/30/2012 3:08 AM, meekerdb wrote:
On 3/29/2012 10:23 PM, Stephen P. King wrote:
Take my favorite thought experiment. Suppose I design two Mars
Rovers and I want them to coordinate their movements in order to
round up Martian sheep. I can easily distribute the artificial
intelligence
On 30 March 2012 03:14, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
My reading of Kent is that he rejects MWI. I don't think he believes there
is a single conscious copy and the rest are zombies; he believes there's
just one world and it is 'selected' probabilistically.
Yes, I understand that. My
On 30 March 2012 10:11, Richard Ruquist yann...@gmail.com wrote:
David,
Selection was even earlier proposed by Leibniz in his Monadology philosophy
along with many other principles about half of which have been confirmed by
scientific theory and experimentation.
On 3/30/2012 4:08 AM, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 3/30/2012 3:08 AM, meekerdb wrote:
On 3/29/2012 10:23 PM, Stephen P. King wrote:
Take my favorite thought experiment. Suppose I design two Mars Rovers and I want
them to coordinate their movements in order to round up Martian sheep. I can
On 3/30/2012 4:38 AM, David Nyman wrote:
The problem with all this (as Kent makes explicit) is that there is
nothing in the mathematics of the game physics that corresponds to
this kind of momentary selection of subjective localisation.
Unfortunately, his own proposal doesn't really solve the
On 3/30/2012 2:48 PM, meekerdb wrote:
On 3/30/2012 4:08 AM, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 3/30/2012 3:08 AM, meekerdb wrote:
On 3/29/2012 10:23 PM, Stephen P. King wrote:
Take my favorite thought experiment. Suppose I design two Mars
Rovers and I want them to coordinate their movements in
On 3/30/2012 2:29 PM, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 3/30/2012 2:48 PM, meekerdb wrote:
On 3/30/2012 4:08 AM, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 3/30/2012 3:08 AM, meekerdb wrote:
On 3/29/2012 10:23 PM, Stephen P. King wrote:
Take my favorite thought experiment. Suppose I design two Mars Rovers and I
On 30 March 2012 19:54, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
The problem with all this (as Kent makes explicit) is that there is
nothing in the mathematics of the game physics that corresponds to
this kind of momentary selection of subjective localisation.
Unfortunately, his own proposal
On 3/30/2012 4:23 PM, David Nyman wrote:
On 30 March 2012 19:54, meekerdbmeeke...@verizon.net wrote:
The problem with all this (as Kent makes explicit) is that there is
nothing in the mathematics of the game physics that corresponds to
this kind of momentary selection of subjective
12 matches
Mail list logo
