I don't know why I got millions reduced to thousands and billions to
millions. I looked up the mass of M87 BH and I find 2.5 billion solar
masses.
LC
On Wednesday, April 10, 2019 at 7:12:13 PM UTC-5, John Clark wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 7:46 PM Lawrence Crowell > wrote:
>
>
On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 5:40 AM Lawrence Crowell <
goldenfieldquaterni...@gmail.com> wrote:
*> I looked up the mass of M87 BH and I find 2.5 billion solar masses.*
>
I believe that figure was from an old measurement, M87's Black Hole is now
thought to be 6.6*10^9 solar masses +- 0.4.
THE BLACK
On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 09:34:54AM -0700, Philip Thrift wrote:
>
[...]
> (About the foot note, not the black hole.)
>
>
> Unix indeed has the Buddha nature.
>
> Microsoft has made available Windows Subsystem for Linux (WSL).
> - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_Subsystem_for_Linux
>
>
On Thursday, April 11, 2019 at 7:12:17 PM UTC-6, Brent wrote:
>
>
>
> On 4/11/2019 4:53 PM, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thursday, April 11, 2019 at 4:37:39 PM UTC-6, Brent wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 4/11/2019 1:58 PM, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>
>>> He might have been referring
On 4/11/2019 9:33 PM, agrayson2...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday, April 11, 2019 at 7:12:17 PM UTC-6, Brent wrote:
On 4/11/2019 4:53 PM, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday, April 11, 2019 at 4:37:39 PM UTC-6, Brent wrote:
On 4/11/2019 1:58 PM, agrays...@gmail.com
On Wednesday, April 10, 2019 at 6:55:55 PM UTC-5, Tomasz Rola wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 09:32:32AM -0400, John Clark wrote:
> > https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/10/science/black-hole-picture.html
> >
>
> Also, here:
>
> https://www.eso.org/public/news/eso1907/
>
> --
> Regards,
>
On Tuesday, April 9, 2019 at 11:09:36 PM UTC-6, Brent wrote:
>
>
>
> On 4/9/2019 6:52 PM, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, April 9, 2019 at 6:41:52 PM UTC-6, Brent wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 4/9/2019 5:20 PM, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday, April 9, 2019 at 2:40:16
On 4/11/2019 1:58 PM, agrayson2...@gmail.com wrote:
He might have been referring to a transformation to a tangent
space where the metric tensor is diagonalized and its derivative
at that point in spacetime is zero. Does this make any sense?
Sort of.
Yeah, that's what
On Thursday, April 11, 2019 at 4:37:39 PM UTC-6, Brent wrote:
>
>
>
> On 4/11/2019 1:58 PM, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
>>>
>> He might have been referring to a transformation to a tangent space where
>> the metric tensor is diagonalized and its derivative at that point in
>> spacetime is
On 4/11/2019 4:53 PM, agrayson2...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday, April 11, 2019 at 4:37:39 PM UTC-6, Brent wrote:
On 4/11/2019 1:58 PM, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
He might have been referring to a transformation to a
tangent space where the metric tensor is
10 matches
Mail list logo