Re: Are there Infinite Versions of You?

On 2/5/2020 4:09 AM, John Clark wrote: On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 6:46 AM Alan Grayson > wrote: /> Poincare Recurrence doesn't apply for a universe with uncountably many possible states./ If there are a uncountably infinite number of possible states then

Re: Are there Infinite Versions of You?

On 2/5/2020 4:42 AM, Alan Grayson wrote: On Wednesday, February 5, 2020 at 5:10:53 AM UTC-7, Lawrence Crowell wrote: On Wednesday, February 5, 2020 at 6:05:54 AM UTC-6, Alan Grayson wrote: On Wednesday, February 5, 2020 at 4:54:03 AM UTC-7, Lawrence Crowell

Re: Reality is a Quantumetric Computer

On Wednesday, February 5, 2020 at 3:40:41 PM UTC-6, Brent wrote: > > > > On 2/5/2020 4:06 AM, Philip Thrift wrote: > > > > On Tuesday, February 4, 2020 at 6:47:41 AM UTC-6, John Clark wrote: >> >> REALITY.SYS Corrupted: Re-boot universe? (Y/N/Q) >> >> John K Clark >> >> > > quantumetric

Re: Reality is a Quantumetric Computer

On Wednesday, February 5, 2020 at 9:25:26 AM UTC-6, Philip Thrift wrote: > > > > On Wednesday, February 5, 2020 at 9:19:00 AM UTC-6, Lawrence Crowell wrote: >> >> On Wednesday, February 5, 2020 at 6:06:18 AM UTC-6, Philip Thrift wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tuesday, February 4, 2020 at 6:47:41 AM

Re: Reality is a Quantumetric Computer

On 2/5/2020 4:06 AM, Philip Thrift wrote: On Tuesday, February 4, 2020 at 6:47:41 AM UTC-6, John Clark wrote: REALITY.SYS Corrupted: Re-boot universe? (Y/N/Q)  John K Clark quantumetric computer The idea basically is to combine • quantum computer • relativistic computer e.g.

Re: Reality is a Quantumetric Computer

On Wednesday, February 5, 2020 at 4:50:36 PM UTC-6, Brent wrote: > > > > On 2/5/2020 2:12 PM, Philip Thrift wrote: > > > > On Wednesday, February 5, 2020 at 4:01:26 PM UTC-6, Brent wrote: >> >> >> >> On 2/5/2020 7:25 AM, Philip Thrift wrote: >> >> >> >> On Wednesday, February 5, 2020 at 9:19:00

Re: Reality is a Quantumetric Computer

On 2/5/2020 2:12 PM, Philip Thrift wrote: On Wednesday, February 5, 2020 at 4:01:26 PM UTC-6, Brent wrote: On 2/5/2020 7:25 AM, Philip Thrift wrote: On Wednesday, February 5, 2020 at 9:19:00 AM UTC-6, Lawrence Crowell wrote: On Wednesday, February 5, 2020 at

Re: Reality is a Quantumetric Computer

On 2/5/2020 7:25 AM, Philip Thrift wrote: On Wednesday, February 5, 2020 at 9:19:00 AM UTC-6, Lawrence Crowell wrote: On Wednesday, February 5, 2020 at 6:06:18 AM UTC-6, Philip Thrift wrote: On Tuesday, February 4, 2020 at 6:47:41 AM UTC-6, John Clark wrote:

Re: Reality is a Quantumetric Computer

On Wednesday, February 5, 2020 at 4:01:26 PM UTC-6, Brent wrote: > > > > On 2/5/2020 7:25 AM, Philip Thrift wrote: > > > > On Wednesday, February 5, 2020 at 9:19:00 AM UTC-6, Lawrence Crowell > wrote: >> >> On Wednesday, February 5, 2020 at 6:06:18 AM UTC-6, Philip Thrift wrote: >>> >>> >>>

Re: Are there Infinite Versions of You?

On Monday, February 3, 2020 at 3:48:00 PM UTC-7, John Clark wrote: > > This video was just uploaded today: > > Are there Infinite Versions of You? > > > John K Clark > *The answer is NO, if at least one parameter of the universe can continuously

Re: Are there Infinite Versions of You?

On Wednesday, February 5, 2020 at 3:12:39 AM UTC-7, John Clark wrote: > > > > On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 3:29 AM Alan Grayson > wrote: > > *> The answer is NO, if at least one parameter of the universe can >> continuously vary, even along a finite interval or dimension. In this case, >> the

Re: Are there Infinite Versions of You?

On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 3:29 AM Alan Grayson wrote: *> The answer is NO, if at least one parameter of the universe can > continuously vary, even along a finite interval or dimension. In this case, > the number of possible universes is UNCOUNTABLE, and IIUC, under this > condition Poincare

Re: Are there Infinite Versions of You?

On Wednesday, February 5, 2020 at 2:29:44 AM UTC-6, Alan Grayson wrote: > > > > On Monday, February 3, 2020 at 3:48:00 PM UTC-7, John Clark wrote: >> >> This video was just uploaded today: >> >> Are there Infinite Versions of You? >> >> >> John K

Re: Are there Infinite Versions of You?

On Wednesday, February 5, 2020 at 4:54:03 AM UTC-7, Lawrence Crowell wrote: > > On Wednesday, February 5, 2020 at 2:29:44 AM UTC-6, Alan Grayson wrote: >> >> >> >> On Monday, February 3, 2020 at 3:48:00 PM UTC-7, John Clark wrote: >>> >>> This video was just uploaded today: >>> >>> Are there

Re: Reality is a Quantumetric Computer

On Tuesday, February 4, 2020 at 6:47:41 AM UTC-6, John Clark wrote: > > REALITY.SYS Corrupted: Re-boot universe? (Y/N/Q) > > John K Clark > > quantumetric computer The idea basically is to combine • quantum computer • relativistic computer e.g. https://arxiv.org/abs/1405.

Re: Are there Infinite Versions of You?

On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 6:46 AM Alan Grayson wrote: *> Poincare Recurrence doesn't apply for a universe with uncountably many > possible states.* > If there are a uncountably infinite number of possible states then there is certainly a countably infinite number of states too. And if there are a

Re: Are there Infinite Versions of You?

On Wednesday, February 5, 2020 at 6:05:54 AM UTC-6, Alan Grayson wrote: > > > > On Wednesday, February 5, 2020 at 4:54:03 AM UTC-7, Lawrence Crowell wrote: >> >> On Wednesday, February 5, 2020 at 2:29:44 AM UTC-6, Alan Grayson wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On Monday, February 3, 2020 at 3:48:00 PM

Re: Are there Infinite Versions of You?

On Wednesday, February 5, 2020 at 5:42:05 AM UTC-7, Alan Grayson wrote: > > > > On Wednesday, February 5, 2020 at 5:10:53 AM UTC-7, Lawrence Crowell wrote: >> >> >> >> On Wednesday, February 5, 2020 at 6:05:54 AM UTC-6, Alan Grayson wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wednesday, February 5, 2020 at

Re: Are there Infinite Versions of You?

On Wednesday, February 5, 2020 at 5:10:53 AM UTC-7, Lawrence Crowell wrote: > > > > On Wednesday, February 5, 2020 at 6:05:54 AM UTC-6, Alan Grayson wrote: >> >> >> >> On Wednesday, February 5, 2020 at 4:54:03 AM UTC-7, Lawrence Crowell >> wrote: >>> >>> On Wednesday, February 5, 2020 at

A Formal System of Axiomatic Set Theory in Coq

pdf: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp==8970457 @philiptrhrift -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

Re: Reality is a Quantumetric Computer

For me, a simpleton, it's hard to imagine a singularity (gravitational?) doing anything but falling in on itself, black hole style. If it somehow, goes into very fast spinning, I could see it being a cosmological wormhole, and thus, being a tunnel to somewhere else in the cosmos. There are, of

Re: Reality is a Quantumetric Computer

On Wednesday, February 5, 2020 at 6:06:18 AM UTC-6, Philip Thrift wrote: > > > > On Tuesday, February 4, 2020 at 6:47:41 AM UTC-6, John Clark wrote: >> >> REALITY.SYS Corrupted: Re-boot universe? (Y/N/Q) >> >> John K Clark >> >> > > quantumetric computer > > The idea basically is to combine > > •

Re: Reality is a Quantumetric Computer

On Wednesday, February 5, 2020 at 9:19:00 AM UTC-6, Lawrence Crowell wrote: > > On Wednesday, February 5, 2020 at 6:06:18 AM UTC-6, Philip Thrift wrote: >> >> >> >> On Tuesday, February 4, 2020 at 6:47:41 AM UTC-6, John Clark wrote: >>> >>> REALITY.SYS Corrupted: Re-boot universe? (Y/N/Q) >>>