On Wednesday, February 5, 2020 at 4:54:03 AM UTC-7, Lawrence Crowell wrote: > > On Wednesday, February 5, 2020 at 2:29:44 AM UTC-6, Alan Grayson wrote: >> >> >> >> On Monday, February 3, 2020 at 3:48:00 PM UTC-7, John Clark wrote: >>> >>> This video was just uploaded today: >>> >>> Are there Infinite Versions of You? >>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qT110-Q8PJI> >>> >>> John K Clark >>> >> >> *The answer is NO, if at least one parameter of the universe can >> continuously vary, even along a finite interval or dimension. In this case, >> the number of possible universes is UNCOUNTABLE, and IIUC, under this >> condition Poincare Recurrence doesn't apply. AG * >> > > The Poincare recurrence of 10^{100} particles, approximately how many > particles are out to the limit of observation, is around 10^{10^{100}} time > units. Those time units would be Planck units of time, but the disparity of > numbers means that we can consider this to be years with little error, > Using the idea of space = time this would mean in spatial distance there is > also a sort of recurrence. So out to that distance there exists some > repeated form of what exists here. The quantum recurrence time is > approximately 10^{10^{10^{100}}} time units or the exponent of this. So > further out in space would imply not only a copy of things here, but also > the same quantum phase. This is something within just the level 1 > multiverse. > > Now this distance is utterly enormous and not just beyond the cosmological > horizon, but beyond a distance where a Planck unit is redshifted to the > horizon scale. This distance is around 2 trillion light years, which is a > mere trifle by comparison to maybe 10^{10^{100}} light years or so. This > length is the absolute limit of any observation. This then means the > universe has some N genus manifold covering, or equivalently some polytope, > covering space to reflect this multiplicity. For the polytope with N facets > the horizon scale is a nearly infinitesimal bubble in the center. > > There is then of course in addition the level 2 multiverse which is the > generation of pocket worlds within an inflationary de Sitter manifold. > These may then have different renormalization group flows for gauge > coupling values and physical vacua. Another level 3, or level 2.2, is the > generation of dS inflationary manifolds from AdS/CFT physics. > > LC >
*Do you agree that if any parameter of our universe logically allows some continuum of values, PR fails? Or if our universe is finite in spatial extent, PR fails? AG * -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/e5c86758-46ea-45e5-a8d0-94c126f74677%40googlegroups.com.
