g/pdf/0812.1290
Onward!
Stephen
From: Bruno Marchal
Sent: Friday, April 08, 2011 2:39 AM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: 1P-causality
Hi Stephen,
On 08 Apr 2011, at 00:25, Stephen Paul King wrote:
Thus wisdom is a measure of how much one knows that one does
not know.
Absol
Hi Bruno,
I found what I have been looking for: arxiv.org/pdf/0812.1290
Onward!
Stephen
From: Bruno Marchal
Sent: Friday, April 08, 2011 2:39 AM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: 1P-causality
Hi Stephen,
On 08 Apr 2011, at 00:25, Stephen Paul King wrote:
Thus
day,
Bruno
Onward!
Stephen
From: Bruno Marchal
Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2011 12:48 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: 1P-causality
Hi John,
I indulge myself in a slight correction on a statement, that you
were just doing for a second time, despite I thought having already
On 08 Apr 2011, at 06:55, meekerdb wrote:
On 4/7/2011 9:48 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Hi John,
I indulge myself in a slight correction on a statement, that you
were just doing for a second time, despite I thought having already
insisted on the point. I am sorry because it is not completely
No problem John. Thanks for your kind reply.
Best,
Bruno
On 07 Apr 2011, at 21:56, John Mikes wrote:
Hello, Bruno,
and thanks for your reply.
I am sorry for an interjected remark-sentence quite out of context
in a topic it does not belong at all. Especially since it was mal-
chosen and mal-
On 4/7/2011 9:48 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Hi John,
I indulge myself in a slight correction on a statement, that you were
just doing for a second time, despite I thought having already
insisted on the point. I am sorry because it is not completely in the
topic:
On 07 Apr 2011, at 17:42, Joh
Hi Bruno,
Thus wisdom is a measure of how much one knows that one does not know.
Onward!
Stephen
From: Bruno Marchal
Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2011 12:48 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: 1P-causality
Hi John,
I indulge myself in a slight correction on a statement
Hello, Bruno,
and thanks for your reply.
I am sorry for an interjected remark-sentence quite out of context in a
topic it does not belong at all. Especially since it was mal-chosen and
mal-formulated.
I enjoyed your teaching about the UM etc., I could use it.
I am presently mentally anchored in my
Hi John,
I indulge myself in a slight correction on a statement, that you were
just doing for a second time, despite I thought having already
insisted on the point. I am sorry because it is not completely in the
topic:
On 07 Apr 2011, at 17:42, John Mikes wrote:
Thanks, Brent, - howeve
Thanks, Brent, - however:
I did not restrict myself to physics (lest: 'fundamental') and had a
shorthand-typo in my text:
- - - (=cause) - - -
which indeed means: "a change, effected by - what we call: a cause".
I was referring to our (conventional) system looking only inside the 'model'
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 4:59 PM, meekerdb wrote:
>
> In fundamental physics where evolution is time-symmetric, the distinction
> between cause and effect is just an arbitrary choice. In more practical
> terms cause usually refers to some part of a process we could chose to
> control. If a cable b
On 4/6/2011 2:06 PM, John Mikes wrote:
The exchange between SPK and Bruno is hard to personalize, there is am
unmarked paragraph after a par marked "...
so I was in doubt whether it is Bruno, or Stephen who wrote:
/"His use of the word "causation" is unfortunate but we can forgive
him becau
The exchange between SPK and Bruno is hard to personalize, there is am
unmarked paragraph after a par marked "...
so I was in doubt whether it is Bruno, or Stephen who wrote:
*"His use of the word "causation" is unfortunate but we can forgive
him because there is no correct word for the
13 matches
Mail list logo
