Re: A Possible Mathematical Structure for Physics

2009-08-19 Thread Bruno Marchal
On 19 Aug 2009, at 18:41, ronaldheld wrote: > > Bruno: > the Plotinus paper is the first one on your list of publications on > your website? Yes. It is also the "pdf" on my home page, at the right of A Purely Arithmetical, yet Empirically Falsifiable, Interpretation of Plotinus’ Theory of Matt

Re: A Possible Mathematical Structure for Physics

2009-08-19 Thread ronaldheld
Bruno: the Plotinus paper is the first one on your list of publications on your website? Ronald On Aug 18, 10:46 am, Bruno Marchal wrote: > Ronald, > > On 18 Aug 2009, at 14:14, ronaldheld wrote: > > > > > I have heard of Octonians but have not used them. > > I do not know anyth

Re: A Possible Mathematical Structure for Physics

2009-08-18 Thread Bruno Marchal
Ronald, On 18 Aug 2009, at 14:14, ronaldheld wrote: > > I have heard of Octonians but have not used them. > I do not know anything about intelligible hypostases Have you heard about Gödel's provability (beweisbar) predicate bew(x)? If you have, define con(x) by ~bew ('~x') (carefully taking in

Re: A Possible Mathematical Structure for Physics

2009-08-18 Thread ronaldheld
Bruno: I have heard of Octonians but have not used them. I do not know anything about intelligible hypostases . Ronald On Aug 18, 2:58 am, Bruno Marchal wrote: > On 17 Aug 2009, at 16:23, ronaldheld wrote: > > > > > arxiv.org:0908.2063v1 > > Any comments? > > Very cute li

Re: A Possible Mathematical Structure for Physics

2009-08-18 Thread Bruno Marchal
On 17 Aug 2009, at 16:23, ronaldheld wrote: > > arxiv.org:0908.2063v1 > Any comments? Very cute little paper. I think the author would have found gravity waves, and thus space- time, by extending its approach to the Octonions (I intuit this since my reading of Kaufman book on knots and phy

Re: A Possible Mathematical Structure for Physics

2009-08-17 Thread David Nyman
2009/8/18 Jesse Mazer : > David Nyman wrote: >> >> >> On 17 Aug, 17:45, Flammarion wrote: >> >> > I've seen John Baez suggest that >> >> For a moment I thought you said Joan Baez (I guess I shouldn't have >> stayed up so late watching "Woodstock - the director's cut"). > > In fact they are cousi

RE: A Possible Mathematical Structure for Physics

2009-08-17 Thread Jesse Mazer
David Nyman wrote: > > > On 17 Aug, 17:45, Flammarion wrote: > > > I've seen John Baez suggest that > > For a moment I thought you said Joan Baez (I guess I shouldn't have > stayed up so late watching "Woodstock - the director's cut"). In fact they are cousins! See question 1 of this interv

Re: A Possible Mathematical Structure for Physics

2009-08-17 Thread David Nyman
On 17 Aug, 17:45, Flammarion wrote: > I've seen John Baez suggest that For a moment I thought you said Joan Baez (I guess I shouldn't have stayed up so late watching "Woodstock - the director's cut"). Were those really the days? D > > On 17 Aug, 15:23, ronaldheld wrote: > > > arxiv.org:0908

Re: A Possible Mathematical Structure for Physics

2009-08-17 Thread Flammarion
I've seen John Baez suggest that On 17 Aug, 15:23, ronaldheld wrote: > arxiv.org:0908.2063v1 > Any comments? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email