Re: shouldn't biology get a reboot?

2013-11-08 Thread Bruno Marchal


On 07 Nov 2013, at 16:47, spudboy...@aol.com wrote:

Now, the question, of questions. Can our minds/personality which  
produces ideas, transcends our tissue and bones?



Yes.





Since, we are speaking science here, and science is concerned with  
explaining How things work, exist, we will need to answer How?



Empirically, our bones and tissues quantum states are only the marks  
of our most probable computational histories. Our minds and  
personality exists, in infinitely many exemplars in arithmetic, out-of- 
time and out of spacewhich belongs to the categories of persistent  
universal number hallucinations.


This should be easy to derive if you grasp all steps in the UD  
Argument, normally.


NUMBERS == NUMBERS DREAMS == PHYSICAL REALITIES == HUMANS ==  
HUMANS DREAMS = ...


Bruno








Locally. Relatively. Yes. Like this post depends on my computer's  
body right now. I agree.


Globally, or theologically, it is more complex. Bodies, like  
orbitals, are map of accessible consistent extensions, and things  
are rich and complex, especially if you are open to the idea of  
conscious universal person, perhaps related to the universal  
numbers, or the Löbian one.


Platonists believes in truth, beauty, justice,  ... and  
computationalist knows that those are like real family, full of  
tension and contradictions, which in a sense makes them alive, and  
almost recognizable from lives to lives.

Our bodies can be the vehicle of ideas which transcends them.

Bruno
-Original Message-
From: Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
To: everything-list everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Wed, Nov 6, 2013 5:35 pm
Subject: Re: shouldn't biology get a reboot?


On 06 Nov 2013, at 17:26, meekerdb wrote:


On 11/6/2013 1:06 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Our bodies are both, I would say. But we are not our bodies, we  
are our values, ideas, memories, etc.


But evolution implies that those are not independent of our bodies.


Locally. Relatively. Yes. Like this post depends on my computer's  
body right now. I agree.


Globally, or theologically, it is more complex. Bodies, like  
orbitals, are map of accessible consistent extensions, and things  
are rich and complex, especially if you are open to the idea of  
conscious universal person, perhaps related to the universal  
numbers, or the Löbian one.


Platonists believes in truth, beauty, justice,  ... and  
computationalist knows that those are like real family, full of  
tension and contradictions, which in a sense makes them alive, and  
almost recognizable from lives to lives.

Our bodies can be the vehicle of ideas which transcends them.

Bruno





Brent

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google  
Groups Everything List group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,  
send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything- 
l...@googlegroups.com.

Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google  
Groups Everything List group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,  
send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.

To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google  
Groups Everything List group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,  
send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.

To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Everything List group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Re: shouldn't biology get a reboot?

2013-11-07 Thread Bruno Marchal


On 07 Nov 2013, at 00:06, meekerdb wrote:


On 11/6/2013 2:35 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote:


On 06 Nov 2013, at 17:26, meekerdb wrote:


On 11/6/2013 1:06 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Our bodies are both, I would say. But we are not our bodies, we  
are our values, ideas, memories, etc.


But evolution implies that those are not independent of our bodies.


Locally. Relatively. Yes. Like this post depends on my computer's  
body right now. I agree.


Globally, or theologically, it is more complex. Bodies, like  
orbitals, are map of accessible consistent extensions, and things  
are rich and complex, especially if you are open to the idea of  
conscious universal person, perhaps related to the universal  
numbers, or the Löbian one.


Platonists believes in truth, beauty, justice,  ... and  
computationalist knows that those are like real family, full of  
tension and contradictions, which in a sense makes them alive, and  
almost recognizable from lives to lives.

Our bodies can be the vehicle of ideas which transcends them.


That fuzzes up the point that evolution accounts for our feelings of  
love, fairness, empathy, curiosity, xenophobia, etc.  Whereas  
Platonism just believes in them and provides no explanatory account.


It seems to me that they do. Plotinus provides better explanation than  
Plato, and comp gives an utterly simple and clean interpretation of  
Plotinus, which is testable. And this can explain the appearance of  
material information, and eventualy of evolution itself. Yet, we  
cannot start from nothing, we have to share at least one notion of  
thing to start the inquiry, and with computationalism, any finite  
elements with laws making them (Turing) universal can be used. Where  
does that come from remains a mystery, but that can be explained too.
Of course I can add that Aristotelian takes the material reality for  
granted, and provides no explanatory account of it, nor of the link  
with the mind, etc. (beside being epistemologically inconsistent with  
computationalism, as I argue often).


Bruno


http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Everything List group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Re: shouldn't biology get a reboot?

2013-11-07 Thread spudboy100

Now, the question, of questions. Can our minds/personality which produces 
ideas, transcends our tissue and bones? Since, we are speaking science here, 
and science is concerned with explaining How things work, exist, we will need 
to answer How?

Locally. Relatively. Yes. Like this post depends on my computer's body right 
now. I agree.


Globally, or theologically, it is more complex. Bodies, like orbitals, are 
map of accessible consistent extensions, and things are rich and complex, 
especially if you are open to the idea of conscious universal person, perhaps 
related to the universal numbers, or the Löbian one. 


Platonists believes in truth, beauty, justice,  ... and computationalist knows 
that those are like real family, full of tension and contradictions, which in a 
sense makes them alive, and almost recognizable from lives to lives.
Our bodies can be the vehicle of ideas which transcends them.


Bruno




-Original Message-
From: Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
To: everything-list everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Wed, Nov 6, 2013 5:35 pm
Subject: Re: shouldn't biology get a reboot?




On 06 Nov 2013, at 17:26, meekerdb wrote:


  

On 11/6/2013 1:06 AM, Bruno Marchal  wrote:


Our bodies are both, I would say. But we are not our  bodies, we are our 
values, ideas, memories, etc.

But evolution implies  that those are not independent of our bodies.




Locally. Relatively. Yes. Like this post depends on my computer's body right 
now. I agree.


Globally, or theologically, it is more complex. Bodies, like orbitals, are 
map of accessible consistent extensions, and things are rich and complex, 
especially if you are open to the idea of conscious universal person, perhaps 
related to the universal numbers, or the Löbian one. 


Platonists believes in truth, beauty, justice,  ... and computationalist knows 
that those are like real family, full of tension and contradictions, which in a 
sense makes them alive, and almost recognizable from lives to lives.
Our bodies can be the vehicle of ideas which transcends them.


Bruno






  
  Brent
  


 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Everything List group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
 Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.



 
http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/



 



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Everything List group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Everything List group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Re: shouldn't biology get a reboot?

2013-11-06 Thread Bruno Marchal


On 06 Nov 2013, at 07:14, Chris de Morsella wrote:



A human has something like ten times as many bacteria in its body  
than it does cells with human DNA. Pretty much all life forms are in  
fact complex multi-species ecosystems that by and large have evolved  
to work together in ways we hardly understand. To give some  
perspective I’ve read there are something like fifty species of  
microorganisms that specialize just on the highly specialized niche  
of living on human tooth enamel. That’s just our teeth! We haven’t  
even gotten to the gum lines (which are a veritable jungle thriving  
with microbial life) and the gut, which is microbial central. We are  
sieves and the world flows through our bodies; we are walking,  
talking ecosystems…. And so is every other living thing, that we can  
see. Even bacteria have bacteriophages.
Even within a single cell; mitochondria carry their own DNA and it  
could be argued the modern cell is the fruit of an ancient union of  
previously different life forms in the distant origins of emergent  
life.


Most cells organels are ancient bacteria, apparently. Some think that  
the nucleus might be an ancient virus.



Are we organisms; or ecosystems?


Our bodies are both, I would say. But we are not our bodies, we are  
our values, ideas, memories, etc. That runs through a complex colony  
of bacteria, microbes, and modern cells, which are quite plausibly the  
result of ancient bacteria and viruses associations. I think.


Bruno





--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google  
Groups Everything List group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,  
send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.

To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Everything List group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Re: shouldn't biology get a reboot?

2013-11-06 Thread meekerdb

On 11/6/2013 1:06 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Our bodies are both, I would say. But we are not our bodies, we are our values, ideas, 
memories, etc.


But evolution implies that those are not independent of our bodies.

Brent

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Everything List group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Re: shouldn't biology get a reboot?

2013-11-06 Thread Craig Weinberg


On Wednesday, November 6, 2013 4:06:29 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:


 On 06 Nov 2013, at 07:14, Chris de Morsella wrote:

  
 A human has something like ten times as many bacteria in its body than it 
 does cells with human DNA. Pretty much all life forms are in fact complex 
 multi-species ecosystems that by and large have evolved to work together in 
 ways we hardly understand. To give some perspective I’ve read there are 
 something like fifty species of microorganisms that specialize just on the 
 highly specialized niche of living on human tooth enamel. That’s just our 
 teeth! We haven’t even gotten to the gum lines (which are a veritable 
 jungle thriving with microbial life) and the gut, which is microbial 
 central. We are sieves and the world flows through our bodies; we are 
 walking, talking ecosystems…. And so is every other living thing, that we 
 can see. Even bacteria have bacteriophages.
 Even within a single cell; mitochondria carry their own DNA and it could 
 be argued the modern cell is the fruit of an ancient union of previously 
 different life forms in the distant origins of emergent life.


 Most cells organels are ancient bacteria, apparently. Some think that the 
 nucleus might be an ancient virus. 

 Are we organisms; or ecosystems?


 Our bodies are both, I would say. But we are not our bodies, we are our 
 values, ideas, memories, etc. That runs through a complex colony of 
 bacteria, microbes, and modern cells, which are quite plausibly the result 
 of ancient bacteria and viruses associations. I think.


On the level that there are bacteria, we don't exist. Bacteria exist in our 
(technologically extended) frame of reference, but we do not exist in their 
frame of reference. The confusion of levels is what compels us to imagine 
that macrophenomenal experiences must be isomorphic to microphysical 
functions. They overlap, but in the same sense that two different 
screenplays which have the same number of words could be stored in the same 
quantity of memory.

Microphenomenal experiences relate to microphysical structures. 
Macrophenomenal experiences relate to macrophysical structures. We do not 
live in our brain, or our body, but in the world of human-scale 
interaction. Of course, that interaction is influenced on all sides by 
sub-personal, super-personal, and impersonal consequences, but they are not 
presented directly on the personal level. Sub-personal conditions are 
represented as urges and sensations while super-personal conditions are 
represented as coincidences and opportunities for conscience.

Craig
 


 Bruno


  

 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Everything List group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com javascript:.
 To post to this group, send email to everyth...@googlegroups.comjavascript:
 .
 Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


 http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Everything List group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Re: shouldn't biology get a reboot?

2013-11-06 Thread John Mikes
Chris - Liz - Bruno Nov.6:
   * Are we organisms; or ecosystems?  *
Who cares? those are WORDS without proper meaning. OF COURSE WE ARE
complexities  (without knowing what they are indeed) and we follow the
partial list of information we so far received.
Try to figure it as nations (countries?) in the UN with diverse goals and
capabilities, interests and tasks etc. All behave in unison, - seemingly -
but every one according to a special role.
Our diversity is much greater and we really know very very little about it.
That is our biology. Some add to it the 'constitution' (consciousness?) and
call something a MInd. Our potential comparison is weak. We are impressed
by the temporary explanations - conventional science finds for phenomena
that appears to show up. Figments.
The only thing we know for sure is that we do not know the vast body of the
'rest'. We learn daily and have no clue WHAT and HOW MUCH there is to come
later on  (if we indeed CAN get it all).


On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 4:06 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:


 On 06 Nov 2013, at 07:14, Chris de Morsella wrote:


 A human has something like ten times as many bacteria in its body than it
 does cells with human DNA. Pretty much all life forms are in fact complex
 multi-species ecosystems that by and large have evolved to work together in
 ways we hardly understand. To give some perspective I’ve read there are
 something like fifty species of microorganisms that specialize just on the
 highly specialized niche of living on human tooth enamel. That’s just our
 teeth! We haven’t even gotten to the gum lines (which are a veritable
 jungle thriving with microbial life) and the gut, which is microbial
 central. We are sieves and the world flows through our bodies; we are
 walking, talking ecosystems…. And so is every other living thing, that we
 can see. Even bacteria have bacteriophages.
 Even within a single cell; mitochondria carry their own DNA and it could
 be argued the modern cell is the fruit of an ancient union of previously
 different life forms in the distant origins of emergent life.


 Most cells organels are ancient bacteria, apparently. Some think that the
 nucleus might be an ancient virus.

 Are we organisms; or ecosystems?


 Our bodies are both, I would say. But we are not our bodies, we are our
 values, ideas, memories, etc. That runs through a complex colony of
 bacteria, microbes, and modern cells, which are quite plausibly the result
 of ancient bacteria and viruses associations. I think.

 Bruno




 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Everything List group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
 Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


 http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/



  --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Everything List group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
 Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Everything List group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Re: shouldn't biology get a reboot?

2013-11-06 Thread Bruno Marchal


On 06 Nov 2013, at 17:26, meekerdb wrote:


On 11/6/2013 1:06 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Our bodies are both, I would say. But we are not our bodies, we are  
our values, ideas, memories, etc.


But evolution implies that those are not independent of our bodies.


Locally. Relatively. Yes. Like this post depends on my computer's body  
right now. I agree.


Globally, or theologically, it is more complex. Bodies, like  
orbitals, are map of accessible consistent extensions, and things are  
rich and complex, especially if you are open to the idea of conscious  
universal person, perhaps related to the universal numbers, or the  
Löbian one.


Platonists believes in truth, beauty, justice,  ... and  
computationalist knows that those are like real family, full of  
tension and contradictions, which in a sense makes them alive, and  
almost recognizable from lives to lives.

Our bodies can be the vehicle of ideas which transcends them.

Bruno





Brent

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google  
Groups Everything List group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,  
send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.

To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Everything List group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Re: shouldn't biology get a reboot?

2013-11-06 Thread meekerdb

On 11/6/2013 2:35 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote:


On 06 Nov 2013, at 17:26, meekerdb wrote:


On 11/6/2013 1:06 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Our bodies are both, I would say. But we are not our bodies, we are our values, ideas, 
memories, etc.


But evolution implies that those are not independent of our bodies.


Locally. Relatively. Yes. Like this post depends on my computer's body right 
now. I agree.

Globally, or theologically, it is more complex. Bodies, like orbitals, are map of 
accessible consistent extensions, and things are rich and complex, especially if you are 
open to the idea of conscious universal person, perhaps related to the universal 
numbers, or the Löbian one.


Platonists believes in truth, beauty, justice,  ... and computationalist knows that 
those are like real family, full of tension and contradictions, which in a sense makes 
them alive, and almost recognizable from lives to lives.

Our bodies can be the vehicle of ideas which transcends them.


That fuzzes up the point that evolution accounts for our feelings of love, fairness, 
empathy, curiosity, xenophobia, etc.  Whereas Platonism just believes in them and 
provides no explanatory account.


Brent

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Everything List group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


RE: shouldn't biology get a reboot?

2013-11-05 Thread Chris de Morsella
 

A human has something like ten times as many bacteria in its body than it
does cells with human DNA. Pretty much all life forms are in fact complex
multi-species ecosystems that by and large have evolved to work together in
ways we hardly understand. To give some perspective I've read there are
something like fifty species of microorganisms that specialize just on the
highly specialized niche of living on human tooth enamel. That's just our
teeth! We haven't even gotten to the gum lines (which are a veritable jungle
thriving with microbial life) and the gut, which is microbial central. We
are sieves and the world flows through our bodies; we are walking, talking
ecosystems.. And so is every other living thing, that we can see. Even
bacteria have bacteriophages. 

Even within a single cell; mitochondria carry their own DNA and it could be
argued the modern cell is the fruit of an ancient union of previously
different life forms in the distant origins of emergent life. 

Are we organisms; or ecosystems?

 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Everything List group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Re: shouldn't biology get a reboot?

2013-11-05 Thread LizR
Both, I believe. (But watch Osmosis Jones for the definitive answer.)


On 6 November 2013 19:14, Chris de Morsella cdemorse...@yahoo.com wrote:



 A human has something like ten times as many bacteria in its body than it
 does cells with human DNA. Pretty much all life forms are in fact complex
 multi-species ecosystems that by and large have evolved to work together in
 ways we hardly understand. To give some perspective I’ve read there are
 something like fifty species of microorganisms that specialize just on the
 highly specialized niche of living on human tooth enamel. That’s just our
 teeth! We haven’t even gotten to the gum lines (which are a veritable
 jungle thriving with microbial life) and the gut, which is microbial
 central. We are sieves and the world flows through our bodies; we are
 walking, talking ecosystems…. And so is every other living thing, that we
 can see. Even bacteria have bacteriophages.

 Even within a single cell; mitochondria carry their own DNA and it could
 be argued the modern cell is the fruit of an ancient union of previously
 different life forms in the distant origins of emergent life.

 Are we organisms; or ecosystems?



 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Everything List group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
 Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Everything List group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.