Marc,
it is easy: the buttler did it. Whatever startles us IS done by
evolution, what indeed does/did not do anything. It is a backwards
observation and its wishful explanation within the knowledge-base
already established.
In contrast: Einstein is not the 1:1 synthesis of his parents, nor are
you
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 1:36 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sep 22, 11:53 pm, "John Mikes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Marc,
> > Your closing line is appreciated.
> > Yet: I still cannot get it: how can you include into an algorithm
> > those features that had not yet been discovered? Loo
On Sep 22, 11:53 pm, "John Mikes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Marc,
> Your closing line is appreciated.
> Yet: I still cannot get it: how can you include into an algorithm
> those features that had not yet been discovered? Look at it
> historically: if you composed such compendium 3000 yeas ago
Of course you are rightless than perfect but ... survival-positive,
at least for now. The criteria for our 'upgrade'? Time will tell.
RE: my project...I am alone. University of Melbourne...dept of
electrical engineering (NICTA) I am doing a PhD investigating what I
call "/a novel backpropag
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 10:53 AM, Colin Hales
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Invent an inorganic 'us'? A faulty, defunct evolutionary mistake? Nah!
But that's my point; we aren't a "mistake" we are merely an invention
of our previous selves.
> ... do you remember one of the Alien series of movies
Invent an inorganic 'us'? A faulty, defunct evolutionary mistake? Nah!
... do you remember one of the Alien series of movies...? I've forgotten
which one... maybe the third? Ripley's group had a robot in it - played
by Winona Ryder. She/Ver/It was a survivor of a 'product recall'... of a
new ge
Marc,
Your closing line is appreciated.
Yet: I still cannot get it: how can you include into an algorithm
those features that had not yet been discovered? Look at it
historically: if you composed such compendium 3000 yeas ago would you
have included 'blank potential' unfilled algorithm for those a
It's quite obvious to me that at one point humans will take AI so far
that they will end up inventing ourselves. That will be an amusing
day.
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 6:48 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Let the algorithm that represents the brain of a typical new-born baby
> be denoted as B1
8 matches
Mail list logo
