Hi John,
On 21 Feb 2010, at 22:11, John Mikes wrote:
Bruno,
interesting exchange with Stephen.
I have a sideline-question:
why do you 'refer-to' and repeatedly invoke into your ways of your
advanced thinking the NAME (I did not say: concept) of GOD, a
noumenon so many times and many
Bruno, thanks for the 'vocal' approval of my (logical) position.
I could not think of more satisfaction.
John M
On 2/22/10, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
Hi John,
On 21 Feb 2010, at 22:11, John Mikes wrote:
Bruno,
interesting exchange with Stephen.
I have a sideline-question:
Hi Stephen,
On 20 Feb 2010, at 19:52, Stephen P. King wrote:
Nature has repeatedly proven herself to be vastly more
clever than we can imagine. Quantum coherence is used in
photosynthesis by plants to increase the efficiency of photon energy
capture by the use of structures
Bruno,
interesting exchange with Stephen.
I have a sideline-question:
why do you 'refer-to' and repeatedly invoke into your ways of your advanced
thinking the NAME (I did not say: concept) of GOD, a noumenon so many times
and many occasions mistreated and misused over the millennia - throughout
Hi Stephen,
On 19 Feb 2010, at 19:43, Stephen P. King wrote:
Tegmark's argument completely ignores the roles that structure can
provide, among other things.
You may elaborate.
I can make sense of this in quantum topology, but this needs huge
magnetic field. I do dream that metallic
Dear John,
On 19 Feb 2010, at 22:54, John Mikes wrote:
I think you (not you alone, it includes the esteemed 'conventional
scientific establishment' as well) got it backwards:
not to start with my own ignorance about what do we call LIFE,
but from the folk-meaning of it on: whatever we
Hi Bruno
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-l...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Bruno Marchal
Sent: Saturday, February 20, 2010 8:07 AM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Does the plants quantum computations?
Hi Stephen,
On 19 Feb 2010, at 19:43
Hi Bruno,
Tegmark's argument completely ignores the roles that structure can
provide, among other things. His paper has been the modern equivalent to the
infamous papers back in the 20th century that proved that heavier than air
flight was impossible. People like him are a net negative
I note this post of Bruno's with great interest and have not so far
found any actual scientific paper, published or otherwise, to the effect
that this effect is anything like so-called quantum computing.
I have copies of the two papers he referred to and an abstract of the
Nature paper.
I'm
Dr. Yates,
This is getting away from the current thread, but I notice on your
site a discussion of free will. In a recent article - in Nature I
seem to recall - using high resolution functional magnet resonance
imaging, the time interval from neural activity to consciousness has
been
10 matches
Mail list logo
