: Facts vs values
On 25 Jan 2013, at 13:33, Roger Clough wrote:
I have no conflict being a scientist when I deal with science, and being
a Christian when I deal with the Bible.
Of course we differ on this. For me science does not exist, only scientific
attitude. And I consider
idiots.
- Receiving the following content -
*From:* Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
*Receiver:* everything-list everything-list@googlegroups.com
*Time:* 2013-01-27, 06:36:10
*Subject:* Re: Facts vs values
On 25 Jan 2013, at 13:33, Roger Clough wrote:
I have no conflict being
it down.
To say it briefly, I believe that religion is not about man,
it's about God.
- Receiving the following content -
From: Alberto G. Corona
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-01-30, 06:23:15
Subject: Re: Re: Facts vs values
2013/1/30 Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net
Hi
John,
On 27 Jan 2013, at 18:09, John Mikes wrote:
Dear Bruno, a brilliant statement.
I use the more polite word 'agnosticism' for 'ignorance'.
No problem. This conveys the main idea.
In our 'absence of knowledge' (how 'bout that?) we try hard to
develop some faith in a setup
On 25 Jan 2013, at 13:33, Roger Clough wrote:
I have no conflict being a scientist when I deal with science, and
being
a Christian when I deal with the Bible.
Of course we differ on this. For me science does not exist, only
scientific attitude. And I consider that the scientific
On 25 Jan 2013, at 16:38, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
Dear Roger,
This is the lutheran view. That´s fine. I love lutherans. but this
work as long as you have faith. But once leave the faith, people
have no guide in very important things and fall in primitive cults
with a modern facade.
Dear Bruno, a brilliant statement.
I use the more polite word *'agnosticism'* for *'ignorance'*.
In our 'absence of knowledge' (how 'bout that?) we try hard to develop some
*faith* in a setup explaining *'us',* 'our world', 'whatever happens' (and
why not) etc. based on the ever increasing
Dear John,
Hear Hear emotions are biases that are imposed on senses, ISTM.
On 1/27/2013 12:09 PM, John Mikes wrote:
Dear Bruno, a brilliant statement.
I use the more polite word *'agnosticism'* for /'ignorance'/.
In our 'absence of knowledge' (how 'bout that?) we try hard to develop
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
I have no conflict being a scientist when I deal with science, and being
a Christian when I deal with the Bible.
As a Christian how do you deal with the fact that the God of the old
testament was such a petty repellent piece of
9 matches
Mail list logo
