On 06 Aug 2016, at 22:13, Brent Meeker wrote:
On 8/6/2016 10:12 AM, smitra wrote:
On 05-08-2016 01:08, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
2016-08-04 19:20 GMT+02:00 smitra :
On 04-08-2016 03:05, Brent Meeker wrote:
On 8/3/2016 4:30 PM, smitra wrote:
On 04-08-2016 01:16, Brent
On 06 Aug 2016, at 19:12, smitra wrote:
On 05-08-2016 01:08, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
2016-08-04 19:20 GMT+02:00 smitra :
On 04-08-2016 03:05, Brent Meeker wrote:
On 8/3/2016 4:30 PM, smitra wrote:
On 04-08-2016 01:16, Brent Meeker wrote:
On 8/3/2016 4:09 PM, smitra wrote:
On
On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 01:08:15AM +0200, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
> 2016-08-04 19:20 GMT+02:00 smitra :
> >
> > I've written in the past about an elaborate procedure involving an AI that
> > resets its memory, but I now think that this is not necessary. It seems to
> > me that
On 8/6/2016 10:12 AM, smitra wrote:
On 05-08-2016 01:08, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
2016-08-04 19:20 GMT+02:00 smitra :
On 04-08-2016 03:05, Brent Meeker wrote:
On 8/3/2016 4:30 PM, smitra wrote:
On 04-08-2016 01:16, Brent Meeker wrote:
On 8/3/2016 4:09 PM, smitra wrote:
On
On 05-08-2016 01:08, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
2016-08-04 19:20 GMT+02:00 smitra :
On 04-08-2016 03:05, Brent Meeker wrote:
On 8/3/2016 4:30 PM, smitra wrote:
On 04-08-2016 01:16, Brent Meeker wrote:
On 8/3/2016 4:09 PM, smitra wrote:
On 04-08-2016 00:12, Stathis Papaioannou
This bet is akin to believing that there are super civilizations in the galaxy,
but we don't know they exist. Could be, but, meh!
-Original Message-
From: John Clark
To: everything-list
Sent: Thu, Aug 4, 2016 2:02 pm
Subject:
2016-08-04 19:20 GMT+02:00 smitra :
> On 04-08-2016 03:05, Brent Meeker wrote:
>
>> On 8/3/2016 4:30 PM, smitra wrote:
>>
>>> On 04-08-2016 01:16, Brent Meeker wrote:
>>>
On 8/3/2016 4:09 PM, smitra wrote:
On 04-08-2016 00:12, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
>
On 8/4/2016 12:45 PM, smitra wrote:
On 04-08-2016 21:35, Brent Meeker wrote:
On 8/4/2016 10:15 AM, smitra wrote:
On 04-08-2016 05:48, Brent Meeker wrote:
On 8/3/2016 6:59 PM, smitra wrote:
Actually, there will objective evidence as to whether or not you
have
won the lottery. There will be
On 04-08-2016 21:35, Brent Meeker wrote:
On 8/4/2016 10:15 AM, smitra wrote:
On 04-08-2016 05:48, Brent Meeker wrote:
On 8/3/2016 6:59 PM, smitra wrote:
Actually, there will objective evidence as to whether or not you
have
won the lottery. There will be a winning number and you will have
a
On 8/4/2016 10:20 AM, smitra wrote:
On 04-08-2016 03:05, Brent Meeker wrote:
On 8/3/2016 4:30 PM, smitra wrote:
On 04-08-2016 01:16, Brent Meeker wrote:
On 8/3/2016 4:09 PM, smitra wrote:
On 04-08-2016 00:12, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
Only if you wake up and find out winning the
On 8/4/2016 10:15 AM, smitra wrote:
On 04-08-2016 05:48, Brent Meeker wrote:
On 8/3/2016 6:59 PM, smitra wrote:
Actually, there will objective evidence as to whether or not you
have
won the lottery. There will be a winning number and you will have
a
ticket that will have this number on it
A few years ago on this list I made a modest proposal, it's a low tech way
to test the Many World's interpretation of Quantum Mechanics and as a bonus
it'll make you rich too. First you buy one Powerball lottery ticket, the
drawing of the winning number is on Saturday at 11pm, now make a simple
On 04 Aug 2016, at 05:48, Brent Meeker wrote:
On 8/3/2016 6:59 PM, smitra wrote:
Actually, there will objective evidence as to whether or not you
have
won the lottery. There will be a winning number and you will have a
ticket that will have this number on it or not, regardless of
On 04-08-2016 03:05, Brent Meeker wrote:
On 8/3/2016 4:30 PM, smitra wrote:
On 04-08-2016 01:16, Brent Meeker wrote:
On 8/3/2016 4:09 PM, smitra wrote:
On 04-08-2016 00:12, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
Only if you wake up and find out winning the lottery was a
mistake,
which seems less
On 04-08-2016 05:48, Brent Meeker wrote:
On 8/3/2016 6:59 PM, smitra wrote:
Actually, there will objective evidence as to whether or not you
have
won the lottery. There will be a winning number and you will have
a
ticket that will have this number on it or not, regardless of
whether
you forget
On 04-08-2016 04:13, Bruce Kellett wrote:
On 4/08/2016 11:59 am, smitra wrote:
On 04-08-2016 01:51, Bruce Kellett wrote:
On 4/08/2016 9:30 am, smitra wrote:
On 04-08-2016 01:16, Brent Meeker wrote:
On 8/3/2016 4:09 PM, smitra wrote:
On 04-08-2016 00:12, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
Only if
>Messaggio originale
>Da: "Bruce Kellett"
>Data: 04/08/2016 4.13
>A:
>Ogg: Re: If you win the lottery, dont expect to live the rest of your
life as a millionaire
>
>On 4/08/2016 11:59 am, smitra wrote:
>> On 04-08-2016
On 8/3/2016 6:59 PM, smitra wrote:
Actually, there will objective evidence as to whether or not you have
won the lottery. There will be a winning number and you will have a
ticket that will have this number on it or not, regardless of whether
you forget anything or not. The idea that branches
On 4/08/2016 11:59 am, smitra wrote:
On 04-08-2016 01:51, Bruce Kellett wrote:
On 4/08/2016 9:30 am, smitra wrote:
On 04-08-2016 01:16, Brent Meeker wrote:
On 8/3/2016 4:09 PM, smitra wrote:
On 04-08-2016 00:12, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
Only if you wake up and find out winning the
On 04-08-2016 01:51, Bruce Kellett wrote:
On 4/08/2016 9:30 am, smitra wrote:
On 04-08-2016 01:16, Brent Meeker wrote:
On 8/3/2016 4:09 PM, smitra wrote:
On 04-08-2016 00:12, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
Only if you wake up and find out winning the lottery was a
mistake,
which seems less
On 8/3/2016 4:30 PM, smitra wrote:
On 04-08-2016 01:16, Brent Meeker wrote:
On 8/3/2016 4:09 PM, smitra wrote:
On 04-08-2016 00:12, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
Only if you wake up and find out winning the lottery was a
mistake,
which seems less likely than waking up a winner. Waking up as
On 4 August 2016 at 09:51, Bruce Kellett wrote:
> On 4/08/2016 9:30 am, smitra wrote:
>
>> On 04-08-2016 01:16, Brent Meeker wrote:
>>
>>> On 8/3/2016 4:09 PM, smitra wrote:
>>>
>>> On 04-08-2016 00:12, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
Only if you wake up and find
On 4/08/2016 9:30 am, smitra wrote:
On 04-08-2016 01:16, Brent Meeker wrote:
On 8/3/2016 4:09 PM, smitra wrote:
On 04-08-2016 00:12, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
Only if you wake up and find out winning the lottery was a
mistake,
which seems less likely than waking up a winner. Waking up as
On 4 August 2016 at 09:09, smitra wrote:
> On 04-08-2016 00:12, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
>
>> Only if you wake up and find out winning the lottery was a mistake,
>> which seems less likely than waking up a winner. Waking up as one of
>> the many copies who didn't win is not
On 04-08-2016 01:16, Brent Meeker wrote:
On 8/3/2016 4:09 PM, smitra wrote:
On 04-08-2016 00:12, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
Only if you wake up and find out winning the lottery was a
mistake,
which seems less likely than waking up a winner. Waking up as one
of
the many copies who didn't win
On 8/3/2016 4:09 PM, smitra wrote:
On 04-08-2016 00:12, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
Only if you wake up and find out winning the lottery was a mistake,
which seems less likely than waking up a winner. Waking up as one of
the many copies who didn't win is not one of the options - those
copies
On 04-08-2016 00:12, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
Only if you wake up and find out winning the lottery was a mistake,
which seems less likely than waking up a winner. Waking up as one of
the many copies who didn't win is not one of the options - those
copies are not continuations of the you who
On 8/3/2016 3:03 PM, smitra wrote:
Suppose that you won the lottery, you had a one in a hundred million
chance to win, so you got extremely lucky. You party, go to bed and
think about planning your trip around the World next morning.
In the MWI, things will actually not pan out this way.
Only if you wake up and find out winning the lottery was a mistake, which
seems less likely than waking up a winner. Waking up as one of the many
copies who didn't win is not one of the options - those copies are not
continuations of the you who won the lottery.
On Thursday, 4 August 2016, smitra
29 matches
Mail list logo