On 3/8/2013 4:33 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Friday, March 8, 2013 1:35:12 PM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 07 Mar 2013, at 17:37, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Thursday, March 7, 2013 8:19:06 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 06 Mar 2013, at 18:49, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Friday, March 8, 2013 1:35:12 PM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>
> On 07 Mar 2013, at 17:37, Craig Weinberg wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thursday, March 7, 2013 8:19:06 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 06 Mar 2013, at 18:49, Craig Weinberg wrote:
>>
>> I understand where you are coming from in
On 07 Mar 2013, at 17:37, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Thursday, March 7, 2013 8:19:06 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 06 Mar 2013, at 18:49, Craig Weinberg wrote:
I understand where you are coming from in MGA now, Bruno, and again
there is nothing wrong with your reasoning, but in that you
On Thursday, March 7, 2013 8:19:06 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>
> On 06 Mar 2013, at 18:49, Craig Weinberg wrote:
>
> I understand where you are coming from in MGA now, Bruno, and again there
> is nothing wrong with your reasoning, but in that your initial assumptions
> are not the univer
On 06 Mar 2013, at 18:49, Craig Weinberg wrote:
I understand where you are coming from in MGA now, Bruno, and again
there is nothing wrong with your reasoning, but in that your initial
assumptions are not the universe that we live in.
?
(the assumption of the whole reasoning is just comp.
I understand where you are coming from in MGA now, Bruno, and again there
is nothing wrong with your reasoning, but in that your initial assumptions
are not the universe that we live in.
Let me give you a thought experiment that might give you a sense of where I
see the assumptions jump to the
6 matches
Mail list logo