On Wed, 2 Jun 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> And by the way, if the measure was NOT continuous along some branches of the
> MW, then we could simply ignore those branches since they are irrelevent to
> immortality, and concern ourselves only with those branches which are
> relevent where the m
Higgo James wrote:
>
> Well said, but I'm not sure your definition of 'I' holds. There are
> infinitely many 'Chris Maloneys' born in a hospital of the same name of
> parents of the same name... etc etc etc who are in no way connected with
> you. Besides, these identifiers are all social naming c
In a message dated 99-06-02 06:52:55 EDT, Jacques Mallah wrote:
> [...] I want to establish a key point. Do you admit that
>if, in fact, your measure were to decrease (for example) exponentially
>with time, you would not be immortal in any meaningful sense?
>If you admit that, then we could
Hi Jacques MM, Russell, and other Everythingers/ManyWorlders
Jacques M Mallah wrote:
> At least, unlike some q-immorters, you admit that you do not think
>measure decreases with time.
Indeed. Although such a question deserves more attention, I would say
that my current *feeling* is that
On 31 xxx -1, Marchal wrote:
> I have probably missed something (in the 10^9 episodes!), but I still
> cannot figure out why should "my" measure decrease with "time".
At least, unlike some q-immorters, you admit that you do not think
measure decreases with time.
> At least with comp, i
Jacques Mallah wrote:
>On Sun, 23 May 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Jacques M Mallah, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, writes:
>> >It is surely true that in the MWI, old copies of you-like beings
>> > will exist. It is also true that they will be of very small measure, and
>> > that the effective p
On Sun, 23 May 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Jacques M Mallah, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, writes:
> > It is surely true that in the MWI, old copies of you-like beings
> > will exist. It is also true that they will be of very small measure, and
> > that the effective probability of being one of t
Jacques M Mallah, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, writes:
> It is surely true that in the MWI, old copies of you-like beings
> will exist. It is also true that they will be of very small measure, and
> that the effective probability of being one of those copies is very tiny.
We would agree that "som
8 matches
Mail list logo
