Re: Subjectivity is no longer a dirty word! A nice video discussing the dual aspect theory

On 10/5/2012 2:41 PM, Platonist Guitar Cowboy wrote: Hi Stephen, Yeah, I was wandering there a bit. Just still not used to the irony of altered states being used in an argument that leaves unsaid the elephant in the room. But I guess if we want something with set and point, this might also

Re: Subjectivity is no longer a dirty word! A nice video discussing the dual aspect theory

Hi Stephen, Yeah, I was wandering there a bit. Just still not used to the irony of altered states being used in an argument that leaves unsaid the elephant in the room. But I guess if we want something with set and point, this might also be your cup of tea, if you're not already familiar with it,

Re: Subjectivity is no longer a dirty word! A nice video discussing the dual aspect theory

On 10/5/2012 12:24 PM, Platonist Guitar Cowboy wrote: On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Roger Clough > wrote: Hi Stephen P. King Many thanks, Stephan ! I should have known it before, but double-aspect and/or dual-aspect theories of mind aren't

Re: Subjectivity is no longer a dirty word! A nice video discussing the dual aspect theory

Hi Richard, Stephen, Roger, Dual aspect theories are plausibly incompatible with comp. In that sense Craig is more coherent, but Stephen, and Chalmers, seems not. They avoid the comp necessary reformulation of the mind-body problem. It is still Aristotle theory variants, unaware of the firs

Re: Subjectivity is no longer a dirty word! A nice video discussing the dual aspect theory

Along the theme of a dual-aspect theory of reality, I recommend the book "Mind and Cosmos:Why the Materialist Neo-Darwinian Conception of Nature Is Almost Certainly False" by Nagel, Thomas. It actually has little to do with Darwin but rather discusses how consciousness, cognition, etc. cannot not b