Thanks John, now I don't feel so bad.
For what it's worth, my plain-English translations of the terms
you mention:
_mass_ = the intrinsic [its own] resistance to being pushed of
something that isn't otherwise stuck down;
_energy_ = motion, particularly as measured and accounted for in
scienti
Mark Peaty wrote:
> No. I don't know of any cosmogony that postulates a massive
> central point. They generally assume zero mass-energy.
>
> Well, OK, put that into plain-English. I think that in doing so
> you have to explain why the e=m.c^2 mass-energy 'equivalence' is
> not a problem. You
Mark,
let me play with your postulate (plain English) vs your text YOU wrote.
To be translated into plain language: Mass, energy, space-time, even
'matter'. (The last one SOUNDS like plain English, yet not in the context we
use it.)
Don't take it too hard. We are used to this lingo, after the 1000t
No. I don't know of any cosmogony that postulates a massive
central point. They generally assume zero mass-energy.
Well, OK, put that into plain-English. I think that in doing so
you have to explain why the e=m.c^2 mass-energy 'equivalence' is
not a problem. You can 'assume zero mass-energy'
On 3/14/07, Colin Hales <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> See previous posts here re EC - Entropy Calculus. This caught my eye,
> thought I'd throw in my $0.02 worth.
>
> I have been working on this idea for a long while now. Am writing it up as
> part of my PhD process.
Makes *complete* sense to
Mark Peaty wrote:
> Brent, how is this for whimsy:
>
> what are now called black holes, and apparently quite well
> verified [and totally not falsified], are conceived to be
> regions of space time in which gravity is so strong that nothing
> from within can escape. Each black hole is centred
Brent, how is this for whimsy:
what are now called black holes, and apparently quite well
verified [and totally not falsified], are conceived to be
regions of space time in which gravity is so strong that nothing
from within can escape. Each black hole is centred upon and
generated by a mass
Thanks.
On 3/20/07, Bruno Marchal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> You could be interested by a paper introducing String theory as a
> syntactical logical structure by the "other Schmidhuber" (Juergen's
> brother Christof):
>
>
> Here:
>
> http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0011065
>
> What are strings m
, I may wish to go further (but cannot?)
Regards
John M
- Original Message -
From: Bruno Marchal
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 10:25 AM
Subject: Re: String theory and Cellular Automata
You could be interested by a paper introducing
You could be interested by a paper introducing String theory as a
syntactical logical structure by the "other Schmidhuber" (Juergen's
brother Christof):
Here:
http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0011065
What are strings made of? The possibility is discussed that strings
are purely mathematical obj
Mohsen Ravanbakhsh wrote:
>
> Hi,
> It was an interesting hypothesis,
> When we're talking black holes we should consider them as the sources of
> reduction of entropy; since when something gets into a black hole we
> have no more information about it and so the overall information of the
> w
Hi,
It was an interesting hypothesis,
When we're talking black holes we should consider them as the sources of
reduction of entropy; since when something gets into a black hole we have no
more information about it and so the overall information of the world
decreases and the same happens to entrop
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 10:57:57AM +1100, Colin Hales wrote:
>
>
> The EC is a lambda calculus formalism that depicts reality. It's actual
> instantation with one particular and unbelievable massive axiom set is the
> universe we are in. The instantation is literally the CA of the EC
> primitive
Hi,
See previous posts here re EC - Entropy Calculus. This caught my eye,
thought I'd throw in my $0.02 worth.
I have been working on this idea for a long while now. Am writing it up as
part of my PhD process.
The EC is a lambda calculus formalism that depicts reality. It's actual
instantati
Mohsen Ravanbakhsh wrote:
> I'm thinking there's some kind of similarity between string theory and
> depicting the world as a big CA. In String theory we have some vibrating
> strings which have some kind of influence on each other and can for
> different matters and fields. CA can play such ro
I'm thinking there's some kind of similarity between string theory and
depicting the world as a big CA. In String theory we have some vibrating
strings which have some kind of influence on each other and can for
different matters and fields. CA can play such role of changing patterns and
of course
16 matches
Mail list logo
