he following content -
From: Stephen P. King
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2012-09-05, 18:23:57
Subject: maudlin's paper
Hi Folks,
I started reading the new Maudlin paper "Time and the Geometry of
the Universe". I got it and started reading. I stopped dead when
On 9/5/2012 9:18 PM, Russell Standish wrote:
On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 06:23:57PM -0400, Stephen P. King wrote:
Hi Folks,
I started reading the new Maudlin paper "Time and the Geometry
of the Universe". I got it and started reading. I stopped dead when
I read the following:
"Empirical consi
On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 06:23:57PM -0400, Stephen P. King wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> I started reading the new Maudlin paper "Time and the Geometry
> of the Universe". I got it and started reading. I stopped dead when
> I read the following:
>
> "Empirical considerations cannot establish the exis
On 9/5/2012 6:52 PM, Richard Ruquist wrote:
I think he was just saying that point events do not exist.
So why discuss them?
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 6:23 PM, Stephen P. King wrote:
Hi Folks,
I started reading the new Maudlin paper "Time and the Geometry of the
Universe". I got it
I think he was just saying that point events do not exist.
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 6:23 PM, Stephen P. King wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> I started reading the new Maudlin paper "Time and the Geometry of the
> Universe". I got it and started reading. I stopped dead when I read the
> following:
>
> "E
Hi Folks,
I started reading the new Maudlin paper "Time and the Geometry of
the Universe". I got it and started reading. I stopped dead when I read
the following:
"Empirical considerations cannot establish the existence of such point
events, but the geometrical tools discussed herein pre
On 28 Jan 2011, at 18:36, Stephen Paul King wrote:
Hi Bruno,
I am a little tired and testy so please forgive me if I am curt
and rushed in my response. I have time now to write so I will, but
be warned...
I appreciate the warnings very much. Thank you. I will display my
massively
Hi Bruno,
I am a little tired and testy so please forgive me if I am curt and rushed
in my response. I have time now to write so I will, but be warned...
From: Bruno Marchal
Sent: Friday, January 28, 2011 11:03 AM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: A comment on Maudlin
Dear Stephen,
On 28 Jan 2011, at 01:13, Stephen Paul King wrote:
Dear Bruno,
Interleaving.
From: Bruno Marchal
Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2011 1:23 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: A comment on Mauldin's paper “Computation and
Consciousness”
On 25 Jan 2011, at 15
Dear Bruno,
Interleaving.
From: Bruno Marchal
Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2011 1:23 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: A comment on Mauldin's paper “Computation and Consciousness”
On 25 Jan 2011, at 15:47, Stephen Paul King wrote:
SPK: The supervenience thesis is
10 matches
Mail list logo