Re: [Evolution-hackers] Send/Receive in the Toolbar

2005-08-05 Thread Rodney Dawes
The tests were actually to create a new mail. Send this file to person [EMAIL PROTECTED]. People would click on Send/Receive thinking that was how you sent mail to people. They were expecting the composer window to pop up, so that they could send mail. -- dobey On Fri, 2005-08-05 at 12:47

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Adding a new server type... How?

2005-08-02 Thread Rodney Dawes
On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 23:53 +0800, Not Zed wrote: Calendar (also used for tasks and notes) and Addressbook each use their own backend system. I think you can do it by implementing a CORBA interface, or perhaps it has some other layers on top so you implement sets of gobject based interfaces.

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Compose should follow Dialog HIG (re location of Send button)

2005-07-25 Thread Rodney Dawes
On Mon, 2005-07-25 at 16:41 +1000, Nigel Tao wrote: On Sat, 2005-07-23 at 13:58 -0400, Rodney Dawes wrote: The Compose windows is NOT a dialog. Conceptually or in practice. It has menus. It has toolbars. It has Minimize/Maximize icons. It is a window. I don't know what the sound juicer UI

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Compose should follow Dialog HIG (re location of Send button)

2005-07-23 Thread Rodney Dawes
The Compose windows is NOT a dialog. Conceptually or in practice. It has menus. It has toolbars. It has Minimize/Maximize icons. It is a window. I don't know what the sound juicer UI is like, but the Compose window in Evolution is not a dialog. Please do not try to make it act like one. -- dobey

Re: [Evolution-hackers] gnutls v1.2.x vs 1.0.xx

2005-07-18 Thread Rodney Dawes
On Mon, 2005-07-18 at 09:08 -0400, JP Rosevear wrote: On Fri, 2005-07-15 at 22:37 +, smurfd wrote: Sooo. this is just a theory so far, i mean, evolution uses mozillas libnss wich in turn might use gnutls. Im not sure, as i said, just a theory. libnss does not use gnutls. However,

Re: [Evolution-hackers] installing evolution-data-server fails on a FHS compliant system

2005-05-31 Thread Rodney Dawes
On Mon, 2005-05-30 at 07:20 +0530, Not Zed wrote: On Sun, 2005-05-29 at 17:27 +0200, Christian Krause wrote: Hi Rodney, On 5/24/05, Rodney Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From the FHS: Applications may use a single subdirectory under /usr/lib. If an application uses

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Question / patch regarding gtkhtml makefile.am

2005-05-31 Thread Rodney Dawes
Please send patches to the evolution-patches list, in unified diff format. Thanks. -I$(includedir) is a problem though, yes. -- dobey On Tue, 2005-05-31 at 22:56 +0200, Ulrich Neumann wrote: Hi all, following situation: I've downloaded gtkhtml from CVS and tried /autogen.sh

Re: [Evolution-hackers] installing evolution-data-server fails on a FHS compliant system

2005-05-24 Thread Rodney Dawes
Oh. Right. I thought libtoolize would fix it. We had the same problem when packaging evolution for SUSE 9.3. What you need to do is not specify libexecdir as $libdir. You need to set it as $prefix/lib/something-else. The bug is still outside of evolution though. This is because evolution has

Re: [Evolution-hackers] New Menu Layout

2005-05-23 Thread Rodney Dawes
all the warnings you added to the build process? On Tue, 2005-05-10 at 11:36 -0400, Rodney Dawes wrote: This apparently got lost somewhere on Thursday when I last sent it. Anwyay, I've gzipped the patch now, so it doesn't get lost in moderation. Here is the latest version

Re: [Evolution-hackers] New Menu Layout

2005-05-23 Thread Rodney Dawes
On Thu, 2005-05-19 at 14:47 +0530, Not Zed wrote: While you're there you should add documentation for the functions you exported. You also need to do something about the removal of the 'hide messages' feature. If a user upgrades to this version and they have hidden messages, there is no

Re: [Evolution-hackers] installing evolution-data-server fails on a FHS compliant system

2005-05-22 Thread Rodney Dawes
On Sun, 2005-05-22 at 19:35 +0200, Christian Krause wrote: Hello JP, When installing evolution-data-server 1.2.x on a system which has a FHS [1] compliant directory structure the evolution-data-server-1.2 binary is copied to a wrong place so that the evolution doesn't find it. This

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Firefox style search bar in evolution

2005-05-12 Thread Rodney Dawes
It is going to stay C-f for now for Forward. Find in Message is C-A-f in the new menu layout. We were originally planning on making it C-f for Find, but too many people complained, so we compromised to just make C-s not be Find. C-s in the new menu layout, is for Save. -- dobey On Thu,

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Firefox style search bar in evolution

2005-05-10 Thread Rodney Dawes
The screenshot and patch were not attached to your mail. I don't like the idea of a Firefox-style search bar in Evolution. It would be confusing to have 2 search bars visible at the same time. This needs some usability testing and more thought, I think. -- dobey On Tue, 2005-05-10 at 04:59

Re: [Evolution-hackers] New Menu Layout

2005-05-10 Thread Rodney Dawes
This apparently got lost somewhere on Thursday when I last sent it. Anwyay, I've gzipped the patch now, so it doesn't get lost in moderation. Here is the latest version of the patch with all the overlooked items hooked up, and the ordering of Actions fixed in the other components. On Wed,

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Patch Review process

2005-05-10 Thread Rodney Dawes
Attachments are often broken in mailing list archives, so this is pretty unreliable for getting at the patches. Attaching them in bugzilla is much better for archiving the patches. -- dobey On Tue, 2005-05-10 at 15:34 +0530, Sarfraaz Ahmed wrote: So, since the main reason for having patches

[Evolution-hackers] Attachment UI Improvements

2005-05-06 Thread Rodney Dawes
For some reason, the menus patch ended up attached to this, and so the previous attempt to send it out yesterday, resulted in the mail getting stuck in the moderation queue. Here it is again, without that patch attached. - Nat and I just had a little discussion on

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Re: Attachment UI Improvements

2005-05-06 Thread Rodney Dawes
On Fri, 2005-05-06 at 09:32 +0530, Not Zed wrote: The reason we can't drop into the main view is multi-fold. One, there is a mixing of semantics of what a drop means in a text area. But of course the other thing is bonobo - we simple cannot access the required information from the editor

[Evolution-hackers] Re: Attachment UI Improvements

2005-05-05 Thread Rodney Dawes
On Thu, 2005-05-05 at 16:01 -0400, Nat Friedman wrote: Another thing which Rodney did not mention is that the text in the attachment bar needs to be changed. Currently it says b1/b File Attached when a file is attached. Sometimes attachments are not files, however, as when I forward a mail

Re: [evolution-patches] Re: [Evolution-hackers] Fix for builderrorin e-utils

2005-05-03 Thread Rodney Dawes
On Tue, 2005-05-03 at 16:18 +0530, Not Zed wrote: On Mon, 2005-05-02 at 11:15 +0100, Philip Van Hoof wrote: On Mon, 2005-05-02 at 14:56 +0530, Not Zed wrote: Hmm, why does this not build? It is like that very speficially so that all of the profiling code can be completely

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Re: UI changes for exchange

2005-05-03 Thread Rodney Dawes
On Fri, 2005-04-29 at 18:33 -0400, David Malcolm wrote: On Fri, 2005-04-29 at 14:25 -0400, Rodney Dawes wrote: I'm strongly against context sensitive main menus. They shouldn't hide and show menu items depending on account. Radical idea: how about having Folder and Email top-level menus

[Evolution-hackers] Re: UI changes for exchange

2005-04-29 Thread Rodney Dawes
On Thu, 2005-04-28 at 18:29 +0530, Sarfraaz Ahmed wrote: Hi, There has been strong user feedback that having an exchange component to perform all exchange specific operations is not very intuitive and not very user friendly. Favourite folder handling is especially very difficult to

Re: [Evolution-hackers] New Menu Layout

2005-04-29 Thread Rodney Dawes
On Fri, 2005-04-29 at 18:51 +0530, Not Zed wrote: Hmm, this seems to be a pretty big patch. It would probably be easier if you just stuck to the ui parts in the patch, and not a major re-factor of bits of code (admitedly needed refactoring). Which parts were crashing? Calling

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Out of tree plugins

2005-04-07 Thread Rodney Dawes
You can copy the necessary uninstalled header files to your plug-in's source tree for the time being I think. AFAIK, the popup bits are the biggest problem here, because you need to get at the object data for the callback. I did this for my (still incomplete) Vonage voip calling plug-in. -- dobey

Re: [Evolution-hackers] configure.in fix

2005-04-06 Thread Rodney Dawes
The changes look ok to me. Perhaps we should just move the definition of EVO_SET_COMPILE_FLAGS to acinclude.m4 though? -- dobey On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 21:32 +0200, ERDI Gergo wrote: Hi, The following patch fixes evolution's and eds's configure.in. the problem is that EVO_SET_COMPILE_FLAGS

[Evolution-hackers] Re: UI Freeze Break Request for Evolution

2005-04-06 Thread Rodney Dawes
Thanks. Committed this. -- dobey On Wed, 2005-04-06 at 11:21 -0600, Elijah Newren wrote: On Apr 6, 2005 11:13 AM, Kjartan Maraas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: man, 04,.04.2005 kl. 14.02 -0400, skrev Rodney Dawes: The following patch fixes bug 73192 for Evolution, but breaks UI freeze

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Marcus Bains Line in calendar

2005-04-05 Thread Rodney Dawes
On Mon, 2005-04-04 at 21:24 -0400, Thouis (Ray) Jones wrote: On Apr 4, 2005 3:29 PM, Rodney Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What about making both parts of the line the same color? (red) Quick gimp replacement: http://people.csail.mit.edu/people/thouis/mb-full-red.png I'll make

Re: [Evolution-hackers] [PATCH] add menu items Mark as Read and Mark as Unread back to emfv_popup_items

2005-04-04 Thread Rodney Dawes
I'm not sure it was done intentionally. However, nobody complained about it when the proposal for the new context menus was made. Nobody complained about it when the patch was being re-iterated so that it could go in, either. Nobody complained about it, until it was in, and we made a release. I've

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Marcus Bains Line in calendar

2005-04-04 Thread Rodney Dawes
On Thu, 2005-03-31 at 16:29 -0500, Thouis (Ray) Jones wrote: On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 21:45:28 +0100, Rodney Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think keeping the line always is a sound default, though it would be better if the line were less intrusive. My suggestion would be to not draw the line

[Evolution-hackers] UI Freeze Break Request for Evolution

2005-04-04 Thread Rodney Dawes
The following patch fixes bug 73192 for Evolution, but breaks UI freeze. It does not break string freeze, as the Mark as Read/Unread strings are the same in the main menus of Evolution (Edit-Mark as ...). Can we please put this in the 2.2 branch. It's a simple change that was overlooked in all of

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Marcus Bains Line in calendar

2005-04-04 Thread Rodney Dawes
On Mon, 2005-04-04 at 13:58 -0400, Thouis (Ray) Jones wrote: On Apr 4, 2005 11:25 AM, Rodney Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'd prefer not to have a key for each part of the line, really. It's just the gap and color difference that bug me. It stands out too much from the rest

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Marcus Bains Line in calendar

2005-04-04 Thread Rodney Dawes
On Mon, 2005-04-04 at 14:56 -0400, Thouis (Ray) Jones wrote: On Apr 4, 2005 2:42 PM, Rodney Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hrmm. I like the color change on the time bar side. would be nice to make the in-view line more subtle too. It needs to stand out, but it doesn't need to divert your

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Marcus Bains Line in calendar

2005-03-31 Thread Rodney Dawes
I think keeping the line always is a sound default, though it would be better if the line were less intrusive. My suggestion would be to not draw the line in the time area, and to use bg[PRELIGHT] for the line that gets drawn through the day views. A hidden gconf key is fine. I don't think we

Re: [Evolution-hackers] problem with evolution-launch-composer.c

2005-01-28 Thread Rodney Dawes
You shouldn't use evolution-launch-composer.c any longer. You should just run evolution mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/path/to/file.ext. This should pop open a composer and attach the file properly. -- dobey On Fri, 2005-01-28 at 10:54 +0100, Karl Pitrich wrote: Hi, i try to create a prefilled

Re: [Evolution-hackers] spamd control?

2005-01-28 Thread Rodney Dawes
Five copies? Or five threads? Are they all the same 15MB of usage? My guess is that you are seeing the threads, and they are all only using 15MB total. Just turning off spamassassin via /etc/sysconfig will stop the global daemon running. If you want to stop the user daemon as well, you will have

[Evolution-hackers] ChangeLog entries and dates

2004-12-14 Thread Rodney Dawes
Could everyone please make sure that when they commit something to CVS and already have ChangeLog entries pending for the patch, to update the dates to the current date when they commit? The ChangeLogs all have dates in whacky order now, which makes it painful to read the ChangeLog and try to

Re: [Evolution-hackers] send/receive

2004-12-13 Thread Rodney Dawes
We should fix the dialog. If we supported Hotmail and Yahoo, and I added accounts to evolution for them, it would already be unwieldy for me. We should probably look into using a GtkListStore model for the dialog or something. -- dobey On Mon, 2004-12-13 at 13:24 -0500, JP Rosevear wrote: On

Re: [Evolution-hackers] .mailfilter and/or Sieve support. And .spamassassin/user_prefs on server

2004-11-22 Thread Rodney Dawes
On Sat, 2004-11-20 at 14:47 +0100, Philip Van Hoof wrote: On Fri, 2004-11-19 at 13:09 -0500, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: We plan to implement Sieve support at some point, but right now not many servers actually support the feature so it's not a high priority. A lot IMAP servers only support

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evolution SSL/TLS improvements

2004-11-12 Thread Rodney Dawes
. Maybe not showing a lock at all for normal connections will suffice. So we can have a connected icon, and a secure icon. Thanks for the feedback. -- dobey On Fri, 2004-11-12 at 09:37 +0100, David Marn Carreo wrote: El jue, 11-11-2004 a las 17:20 -0500, Rodney Dawes escribi: In this mockup

[Evolution-hackers] Evolution SSL/TLS improvements

2004-11-11 Thread Rodney Dawes
So, Back to the three-letter acronym problem we have. I talked with fejj a bit yesterday at lunch, about the use of SSL/TLS, and how the code behaves, and what optimal solutions might be. It occurs to me that people don't use Whenever Possible out of the fear that they will be reading e-mail

Re: [Evolution-hackers] webcalendars

2004-10-04 Thread Rodney Dawes
On Mon, 2004-10-04 at 15:45 +0200, Ron Smits wrote: On Mon, 2004-10-04 at 13:38 +0200, Rodrigo Moya wrote: hmm, where else can evo-webcal get the description of the calendar from? The fact that sometimes evo-webcal will use the description and sometimes not, leads me to believe it uses the

Re: [Evolution-hackers] webcalendars

2004-10-02 Thread Rodney Dawes
On Sat, 2004-10-02 at 12:09 +0200, Ron Smits wrote: Playing some more with a nice little server I was able to create several dynamic webcalendars each containing between 50 and 100 events in two days. Subscribing to 7 of these with evolution was a breeze. With the patch that Rodrigo made

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Re: ipv6 patch

2004-09-21 Thread Rodney Dawes
Looks like the imap4 plug-in would have the same issue, but we don't build it since it is experimental. Should probably update it too as well though. -- dobey On Tue, 2004-09-21 at 19:09 +0200, Frederic Crozat wrote: Le mardi 21 septembre 2004 10:06 +0800, Not Zed a crit : Lads, I

Re: [Evolution-hackers] The calendar appears to be using hard-coded colours

2004-09-16 Thread Rodney Dawes
Evolution 2.0 is the current stable release, and it supports multiple calendars, which have different selectable colors. I'd be inclined to say that the bug no longer exists, but there could be issues in some spots still that need fixed. It needs more testing with 2.0. -- dobey On Thu,

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Ximian Connector for EVolution

2004-08-18 Thread Rodney Dawes
No. It does not use MAPI. It uses the published OWA method of accessing the exchange server. -- dobey On Wed, 2004-08-18 at 12:50 -0700, Sanjay Chadda wrote: Ximian Connector is the plugin for Evolution which adds support for MS Exchange stuff. Does anyone know if Connector uses MSRPC to

Re: [Evolution-hackers] [PATCH] Fix OpenSSL certificate validation in Evolution (1.4.4 and 1.4.6)

2004-08-18 Thread Rodney Dawes
The openssl bits were removed from 1.5 a long time ago, so this patch isn't going in there. -- dobey On Thu, 2004-08-19 at 10:12 +0800, Not Zed wrote: On Wed, 2004-08-18 at 17:03 +0100, Anton Altaparmakov wrote: Hi, I spent most of today trying to figure out why Evolution would report

Re: [Evolution-hackers] mail password dialog?

2004-08-12 Thread Rodney Dawes
The mail component is always loaded. Evolution is not a collection of single separate applications embedded in the same UI. Everything gets loaded at startup. -- dobey On Thu, 2004-08-12 at 17:26 -0400, William Jon McCann wrote: Hi, Just noticed something odd. I started evolution using -c

Re: [Evolution-hackers] 'vertical' view?

2004-08-11 Thread Rodney Dawes
It really requires being able to change the display of the tree list of messages, dynamically, to compress things into a single column of text with multiple lines per row. Otherwise, the mail list is too wide to make this useful at all. One way to use evolution is to just use the external mail

Re: [Evolution-hackers] ldap config dialog issue

2004-06-22 Thread Rodney Dawes
We need to do likewise in the New dialog as well. I made the config dialog match the New dialog. AFAICT, the DN stuff was never getting used. I believe I left the notebook bit to switch the entry widget, in though. -- dobey On Mon, 2004-06-21 at 13:59 -0700, Chris Toshok wrote: It doesn't make

Re: [Evolution-hackers] evolution-1.5: relocation error

2004-06-21 Thread Rodney Dawes
Nah. That would be silly. And I know slackware takes the easiest lazy route in as many cases as it can, which would be to use the defaults. My guess is that gtkhtml is just built incorrectly, or libtool 1.5 is being used, and causing problems. What is the actual output of ldd? -- dobey On Mon,

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Synchronization with PocketPC in Evo 2.0 according to press release

2004-06-09 Thread Rodney Dawes
The press release contains an overlooked mistake. We only have support with syncing to PalmOS devices. The only way to sync to PocketPC or other devices, is to use multisync (http://www.multisync.org/), which does not currently support Evolution 1.5.x, as far as I know. -- dobey On Mr ,

Re: [Evolution-hackers] My Weather...

2004-06-09 Thread Rodney Dawes
This feature was removed from Evolution 1.5, along with the rest of the features of the Summary page. It is recommended that you use gweather or something similar for getting weather information now. -- dobey On Mr , 2004-06-09 at 18:36 +0300, Kaspars wrote: Hi all, I`m interested to add

Re: [Evolution-hackers] source colors

2004-05-28 Thread Rodney Dawes
On Pre , 2004-05-28 at 12:04 +0200, Rodrigo Moya wrote: On Thu, 2004-05-27 at 10:18 -0400, William Jon McCann wrote: Hi, Are the colors for sources intended to be used for foreground or background? It seems that in evolution they are used for both. The source list uses it as a

[Evolution-hackers] Error XML

2004-05-19 Thread Rodney Dawes
The recent changes to use e-error-tool for the error XML files, has broken make dist, when make has not been previously run, as the e-error-tool is written in C, and is not built durint the dist stage. Why exactly are we using this? If intltool is stripping whitespace, why hasn't a bug been

Re: [Fwd: [Evolution-hackers] NTLM stuff]

2004-05-18 Thread Rodney Dawes
That message isn't about handling URIs, and has been replied to quite a bit on the list already. :) -- dobey On Hn , 2004-05-17 at 17:40 +0200, Radek Doulk wrote: Hey, I am forwarding the question I got about GNOME_Evolution_Shell_handleURI, which I am not much aware of. Anyone? Cheers

Re: [Evolution-hackers] NTLM stuff

2004-05-17 Thread Rodney Dawes
On Hn , 2004-05-17 at 14:15 +0200, Sren Hansen wrote: On sn, 2004-05-16 at 22:25 -0400, Rodney Dawes wrote: Would it perhaps be a good idea to split the ntlm related stuff into a library to be maintained and packaged separately? That way, the openldap - evolution interdependency is gone

Re: [Evolution-hackers] evolution w/NSS

2004-05-16 Thread Rodney Dawes
Your suggestion is just a workaround to make evolution link to a system-installed mozilla. This doesn't actually solve the problem, since it ends up linking against a mozilla that is probably different than the one that jhbuild just built. What probably needs to be done is to add the bits to copy

[Evolution-hackers] Re: calendar/gui/dialogs/calendar-setup.glade: uri_button

2004-05-07 Thread Rodney Dawes
Ze button is utterly useless in general. See bug # 57470 -- dobey On Pre , 2004-05-07 at 16:41 +0800, Trent Lloyd wrote: Hi Guys, In the add-calendar-dialog, there is a button called uri_button that has no reference in the code, has a broken icon and ends up just being a tiny blank button

Re: [Evolution-hackers] E-VCard API

2004-04-29 Thread Rodney Dawes
On Enj , 2004-04-29 at 11:20 +0200, Damien Sandras wrote: Hello to all, I have made more progress, but I'm a bit confused by the API. I have added Speeddial support using Chris' trick : attr = e_vcard_attribute_new (NULL, TEL);

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Should the copyright be updated to 2004?

2004-04-23 Thread Rodney Dawes
The just-barely-readable-with-very-very-fine-print image at the bottom of the about box still says 2003. -- dobey On Pre , 2004-04-23 at 14:21 +0800, Not Zed wrote: which one? it shows Copyright (c) 1999-2004 Novell Inc here. On Fri, 2004-04-23 at 11:50 +0800, Calvin Liu wrote: Hi,

[Evolution-hackers] Re: [evolution-patches] Icon Theme Patch

2004-04-19 Thread Rodney Dawes
This patch is in CVS now. -- dobey On Pre , 2004-04-16 at 15:56 -0400, Rodney Dawes wrote: So, Here it finally is. I've gone through and updated the patch to apply/build against the latest cvs (as of 3:50 PM EST today, anyway). I've also gone through and taken care to fix the issues where

Re: [Evolution-hackers] PIM application suite

2004-04-18 Thread Rodney Dawes
On Die , 2004-04-18 at 11:23 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: On Sun, 2004-04-18 at 00:37, Chris Toshok wrote: built-in support for handling calendar attachments (imip? i can't remember all the calendar protocols.) at some point, it will also depend on it for the Followup-Flag feature.

Re: [Evolution-hackers] PIM application suite

2004-04-16 Thread Rodney Dawes
On Pre , 2004-04-16 at 14:27 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: On Thu, 2004-04-15 at 15:41 -0700, Tristan O'Tierney wrote: is there any plan to split evolution up into separate entities that manage calendars, contacts, and email individually? i use a mac every day, so the difference

Re: [Evolution-hackers] component information area.

2004-04-07 Thread Rodney Dawes
On Mr , 2004-04-07 at 17:20 +0800, Not Zed wrote: Hows this stuff look: http://primates.ximian.com/~notzed/test/ui/ Took me a while to work out how to do a few things, hence all the tries. I gave up on the multiple-alternate smaller-text idea for now. The last one (-5) is probably the

Re: [Evolution-hackers] GNOME Certificate Database Library proposal

2004-04-06 Thread Rodney Dawes
This sounds interesting. Have you thought about splitting out the lower level bits, and proposing that for inclusion in freedesktop.org? It seems like a common cert management back-end would make sense for multiple desktops. -- dobey On Pre , 2004-04-02 at 17:04 -0400, Robert Marcano wrote: I

Re: [Evolution-hackers] GNOME 2.6 e-d-s dependencies?

2004-04-02 Thread Rodney Dawes
The option is for the clock applet's optional integration with e-d-s to show your tasks for the day in the pop-down where you normally see the calendar widget. I don't know anything beyond that. If the check doesn't do the right thing with finding the libs, and is undocumented, I'd consider these

Re: [Evolution-hackers] branding

2004-03-31 Thread Rodney Dawes
On Mr , 2004-03-31 at 14:01 -0500, William Jon McCann wrote: Hi, I hope this isn't too controversial... Currently, evolution uses a fair amount of product branding. By this I mean that Ximian Evolution is used as are Ximian logos and trademarks. Given that Evolution is targeting

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Clean installing 1.5.x?

2004-03-25 Thread Rodney Dawes
This actually belongs on the evolution list, not evolution-hackers. Anyway, no, deleting /apps/evolution from gconf is not safe if you use 1.4.x. What you can do, is run evolution-1.5 --force-migrate. However, be VERY WARNED, that this will remove the ~/.evolution directory (the 1.5 directory),

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evolution Webcal 1.0.2

2004-03-21 Thread Rodney Dawes
On Enj , 2004-03-18 at 14:09, William Jon McCann wrote: OK. I think you are right. Most people will probably want to import in this case. I think there is some value in being able to subscribe to any gnome-vfs text/calendar file though. Could be useful for sharing a calendar on an

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evolution Webcal 1.0.2

2004-03-17 Thread Rodney Dawes
On Mr , 2004-03-17 at 17:10, William Jon McCann wrote: Rodney Dawes wrote: Evolution Webcal 1.0.2 is now ready for public consumption and the enjoyment of clicking webcal: urls in your web browsr and having them pop up a subscription dialog. The calendars will automatically appear

[Evolution-hackers] Evolution Webcal 1.0.2

2004-03-16 Thread Rodney Dawes
Evolution Webcal 1.0.2 is now ready for public consumption and the enjoyment of clicking webcal: urls in your web browsr and having them pop up a subscription dialog. The calendars will automatically appear in Evolution 1.5.x if it is running, or will show up the next time you start Evolution. It

Re: [Evolution-hackers] 1.4.6/ORBit2-2.10.x

2004-03-12 Thread Rodney Dawes
It builds against 2.9.8 at least. -- dobey On Pre , 2004-03-12 at 18:03, James Ogley wrote: Hi, Will Evo 1.4.6 build against ORBit2 2.10.0, or only 2.[68].x? signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [Evolution-hackers] gtk2.4 advanced file selection integration?

2004-03-11 Thread Rodney Dawes
We are currently working on a plan for requiring the GNOME 2.6 platform. Hopefully, that will be done soon. :) -- dobey On Enj , 2004-03-11 at 09:21 -0800, Thomas Duffy wrote: Any chance of seeing gtk2.4 advanced file selection dialog integration in Evolution 2.0? I notice it is not in 1.5.5.

Re: [Evolution-hackers] #55299: Can't change several attachment property in Mail

2004-03-09 Thread Rodney Dawes
On Mar , 2004-03-09 at 11:39, Bryan Clark wrote: #4: I'm not really sure what this is. It seems like an unnecessary option, but I couldn't say for sure as I'm at a loss for its use. I'd recommend that this just goes from the dialog altogether unless its functionality is critical. AFAIK,

Re: [Evolution-hackers] commpilig problem with last evo 1.5.5

2004-03-08 Thread Rodney Dawes
On Hn , 2004-03-08 at 10:18, Kaspars wrote: Hi all, I downloaded last evolution source from - http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/evolution/1.5/evolution-1.5.5.tar.gz I have Fedora core 1. Trying to compile it... Problem: checking for libgtkhtml-3.1... Package libgtkhtml-3.1

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Do you want Evo as def. mail?

2004-02-27 Thread Rodney Dawes
On Pre , 2004-02-27 at 15:09 +0100, smurfd wrote: Ah,okey. It sounded good in my head, before i read this, so now i totaly agree.. And i take it,the feature has been taken care of? As i said, ive seen alot of proposals, and nothing in the CVS yet. Nothing is in CVS because none of the

[Evolution-hackers] evolution-data-server and Migration and GConf Schemas

2004-02-12 Thread Rodney Dawes
As I was working on my webcal: handler, I wanted to test it on another machine where I didn't have evolution 1.5 installed. So I proceeded to build and install the tree up to e-d-s, since that was all I would have thought I needed to add a calendar. However, e-d-s isn't doing anything to migrate

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Web Calendar Subscription Utility for Evolution

2004-02-08 Thread Rodney Dawes
things into evolution, when we are moving toward having a separated structure for things like this. -- dobey On Sun, 2004-02-08 at 14:28 -0500, Luis Villa wrote: Why is it a separate app and not evo itself registering itself as the webcal handler? Luis On Sun, 2004-02-08 at 14:48, Rodney Dawes

Re: [Evolution-hackers] web calendars

2004-02-05 Thread Rodney Dawes
On Pre , 2004-01-30 at 06:20, Rodrigo Moya wrote: On Thu, 2004-01-29 at 19:43 -0600, Hans Petter Jansson wrote: HTTPS is not supported yet, but it might be simple to implement now that we're using libsoup in the backend. Writing to remote calendars is not supported in 1.5. right, in

[Evolution-hackers] Alert Dialog API

2004-02-03 Thread Rodney Dawes
So, my current thoughts on writing the API for the HIG-compliant alert dialogs, is that there will be a generic API call for creating custom, and/or extended alert dialogs, and some simplistic API calls for popping up simple dialogs to alert the user of an error, warning, or a simple informational

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Alert Dialog API

2004-02-03 Thread Rodney Dawes
On Mar , 2004-02-03 at 20:17, Dave Malcolm wrote: On Tue, 2004-02-03 at 18:55, Rodney Dawes wrote: So, my current thoughts on writing the API for the HIG-compliant alert dialogs, is that there will be a generic API call for creating custom, and/or extended alert dialogs, and some simplistic

Re: [Evolution-hackers] [Fwd: Weekly Evolution Bug Report]

2004-01-28 Thread Rodney Dawes
This is fixed for good now. The taskbar was showing an empty hbox that took up half the bar, since it was set to expand as well, and the text was getting clipped. I fixed the code to only show the hbox if it has children. -- dobey On Mr , 2004-01-28 at 05:16, Rodrigo Moya wrote: On Wed,

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Fw: Evolution - Send SMS module -

2004-01-27 Thread Rodney Dawes
On Mar , 2004-01-27 at 14:37, Larry Siden wrote: What is SMS? Simple Message Service commonly used on cellular phones. -- dobey On Tue, 2004-01-27 at 03:01, romulus danaila wrote: Hello to everyone, Pease help me I have 1 question: If i want to make a module that send SMS

Re: [Evolution-hackers] [Fwd: Weekly Evolution Bug Report]

2004-01-27 Thread Rodney Dawes
I just committed another fix for this. The weird pango message was only happening for people that use the preview pane (which I do not). It was another little buglet in ETaskBar which is now fixed. -- dobey On Mar , 2004-01-27 at 09:14, ERDI Gergo wrote: On Tue, 27 Jan 2004, Rodney Dawes wrote

Re: [Evolution-hackers] [Fwd: Weekly Evolution Bug Report]

2004-01-26 Thread Rodney Dawes
No. I fixed it. I just made it use an EClippedLabel instead of a GtkLabel. And I tested it afterward with some spam that had really long urls, and I made the window very narrow. If mouse-over status isn't working at all, then something else broke, presumably. -- dobey On Mon, 2004-01-26 at

[Evolution-hackers] Snapshots

2004-01-16 Thread Rodney Dawes
Snapshots are once again building after the Ximian office move. This includes both the Devel and Stable builds. You can go back to happily installing them with Red Carpet or for those that were using FTP, the packages are in there again. -- dobey ___

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Security Bug in HTML

2004-01-11 Thread Rodney Dawes
On Sun, 2004-01-11 at 12:07, guenther wrote: What you just where referring to in your OP, is a widespread method to only fool braindead users -- or users who do not see the target URL at all (sic, Evolution = 1.4.x). This is similar to a href=http://evil.site.com;saint/a, where the user

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Security Bug in HTML

2004-01-11 Thread Rodney Dawes
On Die , 2004-01-11 at 12:56, guenther wrote: I really dunno, what standard breaking you are referring to. (Evolution must *not* change the clear text value between the opening and closing Anchor tag in any way to display the href value. ;-) This is what I was referring to being broken. It

Re: [Evolution-hackers] error building evolution 1.4.x on garnome 0.28.2

2003-12-26 Thread Rodney Dawes
Evolution 1.4 (gal 1.99.x) can not be built against GTK+ 2.3. GAL HEAD has had the GtkComboBox stuff in it renamed though, so it can build. -- dobey On Pre , 2003-12-26 at 02:19, Calvin Liu wrote: Hi, there, I built garnome 0.28.2 on my box intend to obtain multiple gnome instances. But

Re: [Evolution-hackers] evolution build

2003-12-18 Thread Rodney Dawes
On Enj , 2003-12-18 at 18:18, William Jon McCann wrote: Hi, FYI, it looks like building evo from HEAD was broken by a change to libgnomeui. A disable deprecated issue? The DEPRECATED defines were removed from Makefile.am in HEAD. Either you don't have the latest version or something else

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evo icons and images

2003-12-17 Thread Rodney Dawes
Jakub and Tuomas have been moving icons to the gnome-icon-theme module for some time now. However, it still requires a lot of code. And there is a bounty on it: http://www.gnome.org/bounties/Miscellaneous.php3#645366955 :) -- dobey On Mr , 2003-12-17 at 09:54, Ross Burton wrote: Hi, Now

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Notes/Memos component for Evolution?

2003-12-15 Thread Rodney Dawes
Add to Panel - Accessories - Sticky Notes If you want to sync them with a PalmOS device, you would need to write a conduit for gnome-pilot, or a plug-in for multisync if you want to sync them with other handheld devices. There is a bounty being worked on for adding the Tasks to the pop-up of the

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Re: [Evolution-hackers](Sorry..) A RSS Aggregator for evolution.

2003-12-12 Thread Rodney Dawes
On Pre , 2003-12-12 at 05:00, Pradyumna Sampath wrote: Sorry , There already is an aggregator for Evolution. Please close thread. Actually, the Summary is gone in 1.5. We decided that it does belong in a separate application, and Evolution itself is moving toward the direction of having

Re: [Evolution-hackers] tree widget padding in main window

2003-12-11 Thread Rodney Dawes
On Mr , 2003-12-10 at 19:12, Not Zed wrote: Anyway, i know it was probably done like that for a reason, so Toumas, can you check this is ui guide compliant, etc? (i hope it has exceptions for main interface windows, it looks really not great otherwise). The HIG doesn't currently distinguish

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Problem Building GtkHtml 3.1.4

2003-12-10 Thread Rodney Dawes
What version of XML-Parser do you have? I have a feeling that you have an old version that doesn't have the Styles support that newer versions do. OrigTree is a Style module for XML-Parser that comes with intltool. If your XML-Parser doesn't have Style modules support, this would definitely be an

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Problem Building GtkHtml 3.1.4

2003-12-10 Thread Rodney Dawes
On Mr , 2003-12-10 at 11:32, Luis Villa wrote: On Wed, 2003-12-10 at 11:11, Rodney Dawes wrote: What version of XML-Parser do you have? I have a feeling that you have an old version that doesn't have the Styles support that newer versions do. OrigTree is a Style module for XML-Parser

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evolution 1.5

2003-12-08 Thread Rodney Dawes
On Hn , 2003-12-08 at 15:24, James Ogley wrote: As per our Grand Plan (TM) Evolution 1.5 has been released in time for GNOME 2.5.1. Download the following: Snapshots are also available through Red Carpet for 5 platforms including SuSE 9 and RedHat 9. Given that there are SuSE 9.0

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Why no more embedded AbiWord or Gnumeric views?

2003-12-04 Thread Rodney Dawes
It does. You just neeed to enable the mime types. There is a GConf key that has a list of mime types that Evolution will allow embedded bonobo controls to work for. This was added at one point in the 1.2 cycle, iirc, due to security concerns. -- dobey On Enj , 2003-12-04 at 07:17, [EMAIL

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Why no more embedded AbiWord or Gnumeric views?

2003-12-04 Thread Rodney Dawes
/apps/evolution/mail/display/mime_types It's a list of strings like application/x-abiword or such. -- dobey On Enj , 2003-12-04 at 08:36, James Ogley wrote: It does. You just neeed to enable the mime types. There is a GConf key that has a list of mime types that Evolution will allow

Re: [Evolution-hackers] mailto: (etc.) handling

2003-11-27 Thread Rodney Dawes
On Mr , 2003-11-26 at 15:48, Ettore Perazzoli wrote: On Sat, 2003-11-22 at 01:17, Not Zed wrote: Do we need some sort of uri switch, or even some registration process for uri handlers? We already have it, you put it in the .server file. That's how mailto: works now. We need a much

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Mailing list recognition problem

2003-11-27 Thread Rodney Dawes
On Mr , 2003-11-19 at 05:25, Ettore Perazzoli wrote: Hi, I am on a topica.com mailing list that Evolution doesn't recognize as such. (I.e. it doesn't give me an option to create a mailing list rule for it.) The messages do have some mailing list headers that we could use for that

  1   2   >