On Wed, 2001-11-28 at 11:36, Levente Farkas wrote:
what I use. rh 7.2 with ximian gnome (everything from Ximian GNOME Desktop
and Evolution Snapshot) current verion:
evolution-0.99.1-snap.ximian.20040858
Latest Evolution RPM build to my knowledge is
evolution-0.99.2-ximian3.i386.rpm
-
On Thu, 2001-11-29 at 15:33, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
THIS IS A BUG IN GPG!
gpg tells us everything went fine, so Evolution has no way of knowing
that it didn't encrypt to all the recipients we told it to encrypt to,
thus it's not our fault.
Yuck. There's actually several of these
I posted about this a few months ago, and I think I've got something to the stage where
others may be interested in taking a look.
I've created a bonobo component which embeds VIM inside a zvt widget, and implements
part
of the GtkHTML interface. It works with Evolution (if you hack evolution
Awesome! ;-)
Jeff
On Fri, 2001-11-30 at 15:58, Jason D. Hildebrand wrote:
I posted about this a few months ago, and I think I've got something to the stage
where
others may be interested in taking a look.
I've created a bonobo component which embeds VIM inside a zvt widget, and implements
On Fri, 2001-11-30 at 23:02, Jason D. Hildebrand wrote:
There's no reason why the same method wouldn't work for emacs. I guess I thought
that most emacs users run a mail client _inside_ of emacs, and wouldn't
be interested in evolution at all. :)
heh :-)
who want's to run an OS inside a
On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 01:01:40AM +1030, Trevor Nichols wrote:
On Thu, 2001-11-29 at 23:58, Ross Burton wrote:
Its the IMAP server. imapd is the University of Washington IMAP server
which doesn't like multiple connections. I believe if there are
multiple simultaneous connections it will
I've dealt with quite a few SMTP server issues. If you have no trouble
sending to other SMTP servers, try manually sending an email, note: it is
key that you type line 2 exactly as is. Some servers try to perform DNS
resolution on the privided hostname, I have found that this is the problem
On Thu, 2001-11-29 at 18:04, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
Second, a different IMAP mailer on a
different machine, say emacs or outlook, won't know anything about evo's
virtual folder; all it could do is to look at the unexpunged email.
That's undesirable since a user would need to scroll
On Fri, 30 Nov 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've dealt with quite a few SMTP server issues. If you have no trouble
sending to other SMTP servers, try manually sending an email, note: it is
key that you type line 2 exactly as is. Some servers try to perform DNS
resolution on the privided
Unless the server is a wonderful Micro$oft server...For some reason,
even though Microsoft asks for the FQDN in windows 2000, i.e. with the
appended origin '.' and the end of the domain-name... Check this:
Escape character is '^]'.
220 s005034078.asp.anobi.com Microsoft ESMTP MAIL Service,
You can configure Outlook to not show deleted messages
Outlook has 2 modes for IMAP, 1 is where they show deleted messages
and the other is where they move deleted messages to a Trash folder.
Jeff
On Fri, 2001-11-30 at 11:08, Dwight Hubbard wrote:
On Thu, 2001-11-29 at 18:04, Jeffrey Stedfast
On Thu, 2001-11-29 at 22:39, Thomas O'Dowd wrote:
Evolution currently has problems verifying inline PGP signed messages
from mailers when they are qp'd by a gateway along the way. Mutt doesn't
have that problem so I'm suggesting being liberal (as it is inline pgp
anyway) and unencode first
On Fri, 2001-11-30 at 11:43, Mark Neill wrote:
This is not true. Deleting a message in evolution, then accessing the
imap folder with outlook shows the deleted message message. At least
with Exchange as the imap server.
Deleting a message in outlook and going into the folder with
More importantly be willing to wait 10 minutes. We are getting this on
a server with bad reverse DNS lookups. EVO may be timing out.
On Fri, 2001-11-30 at 08:41, Mark Neill wrote:
On Fri, 30 Nov 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've dealt with quite a few SMTP server issues. If you have no
Here's a bunch of (probably) stupid questions.
Any particular reason it was branched? Just curious since I though the
normal way was to remain in one branch until 1.0 then branch new
development.
So, to continue my ways of having the latest stuff from CVS, should I
change the GAL and Evolution
On Tue, 2001-11-27 at 08:01, Thomas J. Baker wrote:
I've got a problem with a single folder/filter combination. I have a
folder that has mail filtered to it from a single source. When new mail
arrives in that folder, that folder name doesn't get changed to bold in
the folder list, nor is it's
perhaps anybody out there who can help me making it better?
On Fri, 2001-11-30 at 21:44, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
The Content-Id on the image is invalid in multiple ways.
Jeff
On Fri, 2001-11-30 at 15:31, Manuel Streuhofer wrote:
Hi List!
a week ago i sent a bug to the list. but i
I seem to have a problem with the font size of mail header fields.
The field labels (To:, From: etc) are sizing correctly as per the
GTKHTML settings in gnomecc, but the data portion of the display (the
actual from and to addressses, and subject text) are miniscule.
Where does Evolution pull
yoz.
someone sent me a zaplet message (zaplet.com), and it did not display
correctly at all. i assume this would be because of invalid html or
some such, any prior knowledge of zaplet-evo. interaction?
-Joe
msg03725/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
hi
first of all thanks for this great software, i've been using it for
quite a while now and it is getting more stable with every beta/rc.
still i'm missing some features that would make it even better. if some
of them are already possible and i just didn't find them yet, please
somebody
Let me explain:
As a member of Linux Users' Group of Turkey, I'll try to perform a
quick demonstration of Evolution at 7th and 8th (this weekend).
Therefore, to save some time; I'm looking for a slideshow or some
eye-candy stuff.
Can you help? :)
Thanks
--
1/2
1.0 is on the gtkhtml-1-0-branch
--Larry
On Thu, 2001-11-29 at 22:37, Dan Hensley wrote:
A few days ago I updated the Evolution 1 branch from CVS, and it's
looking for gtkhtml 1.0. However, gtkhtml hasn't updated for a few
days, and it's still at 0.16.1. Is it just that anoncvs hasn't
On Fri, 2001-11-30 at 17:31, Joe Barnett wrote:
yoz.
someone sent me a zaplet message (zaplet.com), and it did not display
correctly at all. i assume this would be because of invalid html or
some such, any prior knowledge of zaplet-evo. interaction?
Never heard of it. You could forward
23 matches
Mail list logo
