Hi Matthew,
On Wednesday, 04 August 2010, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 16:03 +0200, Christian Hilberg wrote:
> > Is there any good alternative to using libsoup which makes use of NSS?
> > We're pretty much depending on the (mostly) working NSS infrastructure
> > for PKCS #11 and t
On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 16:03 +0200, Christian Hilberg wrote:
> Is there any good alternative to using libsoup which makes use of NSS? We're
> pretty much depending on the (mostly) working NSS infrastructure for PKCS #11
> and token handling for certificate based client auth.
That I don't know. Y
Hi there,
On Wednesday 04 August 2010 Matthew Barnes wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 13:28 +0200, Christian Hilberg wrote:
> > Does libsoup make use of NSS (just the newbie's uninitiated question)?
> It uses GnuTLS for transport layer security.
> http://www.gnu.org/software/gnutls/
Is there any go
On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 13:28 +0200, Christian Hilberg wrote:
> Does libsoup make use of NSS (just the newbie's uninitiated question)?
It uses GnuTLS for transport layer security.
http://www.gnu.org/software/gnutls/
> Hey, thanks for that hint! :-) Maybe it would be wise to mark such classes as
Hi Matthew,
thanks for the prompt reply.
On Wednesday, 04 August 2010 Matthew Barnes wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 12:50 +0200, Christian Hilberg wrote:
> > Using the Camel.HttpStream should do the trick - is that correct? I've
> > seen the Camel.HttpStream being used within Anjal (file
> > em-f
On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 12:50 +0200, Christian Hilberg wrote:
> Using the Camel.HttpStream should do the trick - is that correct? I've seen
> the Camel.HttpStream being used within Anjal (file em-format-mail.c). Is this
> Camel HTTP part being used somewhere else as well (to be used as another
> r
Hi everyone.
Within our evolution-kolab plugin, we need to access the webserver part of
Kolab to retrieve free-busy information (no more than simple GET requests
needed, but with authentication - as far as we can see atm ;-). The Kolab
webserver will answer the GET request with an iCal file con
Hi again.
On Monday 26 July 2010 Christian Hilberg wrote:
> while I suspect the answer will most likely be "no", just to be sure I'd
> like to put the question here anyway (if only for the record):
> Does the Camel IMAPX implementation comply with RFC5464 "The IMAP METADATA
> Extension" [1] ?
> [.
